[jounal] Southam - Gerow, M. A. / 2002 / Emotion regulation and understanding: implications
for child psychopathology and therapy / Clinical Psychology Review 22: 189 ~ 222
[jounal] Keenan, K. / 2000 / Emotion dysregulation as a risk factor
for child psychopathology / Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice 7: 418 ~ 434
For example, Goodman's Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire in which information can be combined from the child, the parent and the teacher in order to develop the most sensitive and specific screening tool
for child psychopathology.15
The CBCL / 1.5 — 5 consists of 100 items that are rated by parents on a 3 - point - scale, and the Total Problems raw score serves as a measure
for child psychopathology.
Emotion regulation and understanding: implications
for child psychopathology and therapy.
Emotion Regulation and Understanding: Implication
for Child Psychopathology and Therapy.
Not exact matches
-- Georg Kühlewind The Hague Circle Report — James Pewtherer and Monique Grund Special Section: The Push
for Early Childhood Literacy: Taking a Careful Look Moving in Slow Motion — Barry Sanders A Risk Factor in
Child Psychopathology — Sharna Olfman Critical Issues and Concerns — Nancy Carlsson - Paige The Loss of Nature — William Crain The Push
for Early Childhood Literacy: A View from Europe — Christopher Clouder
•
For these and other reasons, although
children in mother - stepfather families tend to experience better financial support than
children in lone mother households, and their stepfathers tend to be of higher «quality» than their biological fathers in terms of education, employment,
psychopathology etc. (McLanahan et al, 2006) their outcomes and adjustment are not superior to
children in lone mother households, although there may be cultural variations.
Abstract Interest in mindfulness - based interventions
for children and adolescents is growing, but despite substantial evidence that parental distress and
psychopathology adversely affects
children, there is little research on how mindfulness - based parenting interventions might benefit the
child as well as the parent.
Although not all
children with insecure attachments will develop later
psychopathologies or generalized problems, the likelihood that they do is far greater than
for children with secure attachments [4].
Published on November 8 in Development and
Psychopathology, the findings are good news
for mothers and their
children alike.
Published online November 8 in Development and
Psychopathology, the findings are good news
for mothers and their
children alike.
Living with an alienating parent is analogous to a petri dish cultivating future
psychopathology for the
children.
essay addresses the issue of Court Orders
for joint custody that essentially become orders
for de facto sole custody to the alienation - pathological parent unless the underlying
psychopathology being induced in the
child by the alienating parent is effectively resolved (requiring separation of the
child during treatment from the source origin of the
psychopathology).
Children of mothers with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are a disadvantaged group of children that are at risk for future psychopa
Children of mothers with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are a disadvantaged group of
children that are at risk for future psychopa
children that are at risk
for future
psychopathology.
The Total Difficulties scale represents the sum of items on the four
psychopathology scales (Emotional Symptoms, Peer Relationship Problems, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity - Inattention); BFQ - C, short form of the Big Five Questionnaire
for Children; CTNI / CTNS, Connection to Nature Index / Connectedness to Nature Scale.
Psychopathology was evaluated using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule
for Children and the
Child Behavior Checklist.
The implications of this research
for developmental
psychopathology and clinical work are discussed with an emphasis on parent —
child jointly constructed narratives as the meeting point of individual
child and parent narratives.
The
Children's Interview
for Psychiatric Syndromes32 and the
Children's Interview
for Psychiatric Syndromes — Parent Version33 are structured psychiatric interviews designed to assess
psychopathology according to DSM - IV criteria in clinical and epidemiological research with youth aged 6 to 18 years.34 - 38 The
Children's Interview
for Psychiatric Syndromes and the
Children's Interview
for Psychiatric Syndromes — Parent Version assess 20 behavioral, anxiety, mood, and other syndromes as well as psychosocial stressors.
To ascertain whether maternal depression status biased reports of
children's
psychopathology, we compared Kiddie Schedule
for Disorders and Schizophrenia assessments of each mother and
child (data available on request).
Studies have also found that poor parent -
child communication is a risk factor
for adolescent suicide, 58 and not talking about suicidal ideation is associated with suicide attempts among adolescents.59
Psychopathology, primarily depression, has been found to characterize most adolescent suicides.8, 60,61
Behavior therapy is considered probably efficacious
for childhood depression, and a number of other experimental interventions show promise but require further evaluation.12 Currently, only 2 research groups have focused on psychosocial interventions
for childhood bipolar disorder.13 - 15 Hence, increased attention to creation and testing of treatments specifically targeting depression and bipolar disorder in
children is needed.16 In particular, studies should focus on
children's developmental needs, address comorbidity, involve family members in treatment, demonstrate treatment gains as rated by parents and clinicians rather than
children themselves, and compare experimental interventions with standard care or treatment as usual (TAU) rather than no - treatment or attention control groups.12, 17,18 In addition, parental
psychopathology may affect treatment adherence and response.
/ Praxis / Prayer / Preoccupation with risk / Prepackaged consequences / Prerequisites
for intervention / Prerequisites of treatment / Prevention / Primary experience / Prime movers - and shakers / Principles / Principles of quality care / Proactive / Reactive / Problems to strengths / Process of integration / Profession / Professional
child and youth care workers / Professional development / Professional field / Professional pessimism / Professional worker / Professionalization (1) / Professionalization (2) / Professionalization of CYC work / Program evaluation / Program size / Programming (1) / Programming (2) / Programming (3) / Programming (4) / Programmes and praxis / Programs
for street
children / Progressive schools / Projections / Promoting activities / Promoting resilience / Promoting resilience / Psychodynamic approach / Psychodynamic care work / «Psychological parent» /
Psychopathology or coping / Psychotherapy / Psychotherapy and
child & youth care / Punishment (1) / Punishment (2) / Punishment and reward / Pupils» backgrounds / Pushing buttons
Childress calls it «a form of pathogenic parenting, which is a clinical term
for parenting behavior so aberrant and distorted that it creates
psychopathology in a
child.»
On the other hand, there was less psychometric data available
for the six «self - related» scales than
for the
psychopathology scales, although internal consistencies
for these scales were uniformly high (with the exception of some subscales
for the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance
for Young
Children; PSPCSAYC).
The
children of these parents suffer
psychopathology of the worst order, distress that will assure them of the need
for life - long psychotherapy.
For the SDQ psychopathology scales, table 5 (and online supplementary table 5 - X) indicates the proportions of children falling within the normal (defined as ~ 80 %), borderline (~ 10 %) and abnormal (~ 10 %) categories defined for the SDQ based on the UK population norms, as well as the proportions of children scoring in each category of the more recent four - level solution (close to average ~ 80 %, slightly raised ~ 10 %, high ~ 5 %, very high ~ 5
For the SDQ
psychopathology scales, table 5 (and online supplementary table 5 - X) indicates the proportions of
children falling within the normal (defined as ~ 80 %), borderline (~ 10 %) and abnormal (~ 10 %) categories defined
for the SDQ based on the UK population norms, as well as the proportions of children scoring in each category of the more recent four - level solution (close to average ~ 80 %, slightly raised ~ 10 %, high ~ 5 %, very high ~ 5
for the SDQ based on the UK population norms, as well as the proportions of
children scoring in each category of the more recent four - level solution (close to average ~ 80 %, slightly raised ~ 10 %, high ~ 5 %, very high ~ 5 %).
Adolescents» behaviour may vary from one context to another, or from one interaction partner to another, and informants» reports may be affected by their own perspectives.13 Because there is no gold standard
for psychiatric disorders, and reports from different informants tend to correlate only moderately, using information from multiple informants seems the best strategy to chart mental health.14 Among other things, adherence to this first principle is expressed in the use of
child (Youth Self - report; YSR), and parent (Child Behavior Checklist; CBCL) questionnaires on child / adolescent mental health, which are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), 15,16 and the use of a teacher - report (Teacher Checklist of Psychopathology), which was developed for TRAILS on the basis of the Achenbach Teachers Report Form.17 It is also expressed in the use of peer nominations to assess adolescents» social status at sc
child (Youth Self - report; YSR), and parent (
Child Behavior Checklist; CBCL) questionnaires on child / adolescent mental health, which are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), 15,16 and the use of a teacher - report (Teacher Checklist of Psychopathology), which was developed for TRAILS on the basis of the Achenbach Teachers Report Form.17 It is also expressed in the use of peer nominations to assess adolescents» social status at sc
Child Behavior Checklist; CBCL) questionnaires on
child / adolescent mental health, which are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), 15,16 and the use of a teacher - report (Teacher Checklist of Psychopathology), which was developed for TRAILS on the basis of the Achenbach Teachers Report Form.17 It is also expressed in the use of peer nominations to assess adolescents» social status at sc
child / adolescent mental health, which are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), 15,16 and the use of a teacher - report (Teacher Checklist of
Psychopathology), which was developed
for TRAILS on the basis of the Achenbach Teachers Report Form.17 It is also expressed in the use of peer nominations to assess adolescents» social status at school.
Physical Punishment, Childhood Abuse and Psychiatric Disorders Afifi, Brownridge, Cox, & Sareen
Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal, 30 (10), 2006 View Abstract Compares the childhood experience of physical punishment or physical abuse and whether it was associated with adult psychopathology, after adjusting for sociodemographic variables and parent - child attachment
Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal, 30 (10), 2006 View Abstract Compares the childhood experience of physical punishment or physical abuse and whether it was associated with adult
psychopathology, after adjusting
for sociodemographic variables and parent -
child attachment
child attachment type.
Even when study is limited to family processes as influences, multivariate risk models find support.9 - 12
For example, Cummings and Davies13 presented a framework for how multiple disruptions in child and family functioning and related contexts are supported as pertinent to associations between maternal depression and early child adjustment, including problematic parenting, marital conflict, children's exposure to parental depression, and related difficulties in family processes.10, 11 A particular focus of this family process model is identifying and distinguishing specific response processes in the child (e.g., emotional insecurity; specific emotional, cognitive, behavioral or physiological responses) that, over time, account for normal development or the development of psychopathology
For example, Cummings and Davies13 presented a framework
for how multiple disruptions in child and family functioning and related contexts are supported as pertinent to associations between maternal depression and early child adjustment, including problematic parenting, marital conflict, children's exposure to parental depression, and related difficulties in family processes.10, 11 A particular focus of this family process model is identifying and distinguishing specific response processes in the child (e.g., emotional insecurity; specific emotional, cognitive, behavioral or physiological responses) that, over time, account for normal development or the development of psychopathology
for how multiple disruptions in
child and family functioning and related contexts are supported as pertinent to associations between maternal depression and early
child adjustment, including problematic parenting, marital conflict,
children's exposure to parental depression, and related difficulties in family processes.10, 11 A particular focus of this family process model is identifying and distinguishing specific response processes in the
child (e.g., emotional insecurity; specific emotional, cognitive, behavioral or physiological responses) that, over time, account
for normal development or the development of psychopathology
for normal development or the development of
psychopathology.10
Caregiver -
Child Relationships in Early Childhood: Interventions to Promote Well - Being and Reduce Risk
for Psychopathology.
This is a serious gap in our knowledge
for two reasons: (1) Recent research has shown that disorganized attachment is a predictor of
psychopathology, whereas insecure - avoidant and resistant attachment lead to less optimal but not pathological
child adjustment.10 Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate attachment - based interventions on their potential value to prevent attachment disorganization.
Policy - makers and clinicians should work together to make services, such as screenings
for pregnant women and mothers, readily available.6 Programs aimed at reducing disruptions to family functioning are one avenue
for decreasing
children's risk
for psychopathology.
Design (and evaluate) prevention and intervention programs to promote a secure parent - infant attachment relationship in order to improve developmental outcomes of infants and
children who are at risk
for poor developmental outcomes and prevent behaviour problems and
psychopathology.
Rather fewer meet the diagnostic criteria
for research, which
for the oppositional defiant type of conduct disorder seen in younger
children require at least four specific behaviours to be present.7 The early onset pattern — typically beginning at the age of 2 or 3 years — is associated with comorbid
psychopathology such as hyperactivity and emotional problems, language disorders, neuropsychological deficits such as poor attention and lower IQ, high heritability, 8 and lifelong antisocial behaviour.9 In contrast, teenage onset antisocial behaviour is not associated with other disorders or neuropsychological deficits, is more environmentally determined than inherited, and tends not to persist into adulthood.9
Dr. Lane Strathearn, Director of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics and Physician Director at the University of Iowa's Center
for Disabilities and Development, presents information regarding research conducted in the Attachment and Neurodevelopment Lab, discusses how face - to - face parent - infant interaction promotes healthy social and emotional development, explains the mechanisms through which adverse childhood experiences may adversely impact
child development, and explores some specific examples of parental
psychopathology and potential effects on parenting capacity.
Positive outcomes favoring the Seeking Safety condition were found in various domains including substance use and associated problems (on the Personal Experiences Scale and the Adolescent
Psychopathology Scale), some trauma - related symptoms (on the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children), cognitions related to SUD and PTSD (the Reasons for Using Scale and the World Assumptions Scale), and various psychopathology (on the Adolescent Psychopa
Psychopathology Scale), some trauma - related symptoms (on the Trauma Symptom Checklist
for Children), cognitions related to SUD and PTSD (the Reasons
for Using Scale and the World Assumptions Scale), and various
psychopathology (on the Adolescent Psychopa
psychopathology (on the Adolescent
PsychopathologyPsychopathology Scale).
[jounal] Pollak, S. D. / 2003 / Experience ‐ Dependent Affective Learning and Risk
for Psychopathology in
Children / Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1008 (1): 102 ~ 111
To the extent that professional incompetence in diagnosing evident narcissistic and borderline personality processes involved in a cross-generational parent -
child coalition causes harm to the targeted - rejected parent through the loss of an affectionally bonded attachment relationship with their
child as a result of the undiagnosed and untreated
psychopathology and pathogenic parenting of the narcissistic / (borderline) allied and supposedly «favored» parent within the parent -
child coalition, this may represent negligent professional practice that is directly responsible
for causing harm to the client.
To the extent that professional incompetence in diagnosing narcissistic and borderline personality processes involved in a cross-generational parent -
child coalition causes developmental, emotional, and psychological harm to the
child client through the loss of an affectionally bonded attachment relationship with a normal - range and affectionally available parent (i.e., the parent who is rejected by the
child as a result of the undiagnosed and so untreated
psychopathology and pathogenic parenting of the narcissistic / (borderline) allied and supposedly «favored» parent within the parent -
child coalition), this may represent negligent professional practice that is directly responsible
for causing harm to the client.
The presence in the
child's symptom display of the three characteristic diagnostic indicators (i.e., the «psychological fingerprints») of the child's psychological influence and control by a narcissistic / (borderline) parent represents sufficient and definitive clinical evidence that the symptomatic child - initiated cut - off of the child's relationship with the other parent is the direct result of the pathogenic parenting practices of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent (i.e., the allied and supposedly «favored» parent), who is using the child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child's symptom display of the three characteristic diagnostic indicators (i.e., the «psychological fingerprints») of the
child's psychological influence and control by a narcissistic / (borderline) parent represents sufficient and definitive clinical evidence that the symptomatic child - initiated cut - off of the child's relationship with the other parent is the direct result of the pathogenic parenting practices of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent (i.e., the allied and supposedly «favored» parent), who is using the child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child's psychological influence and control by a narcissistic / (borderline) parent represents sufficient and definitive clinical evidence that the symptomatic
child - initiated cut - off of the child's relationship with the other parent is the direct result of the pathogenic parenting practices of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent (i.e., the allied and supposedly «favored» parent), who is using the child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child - initiated cut - off of the
child's relationship with the other parent is the direct result of the pathogenic parenting practices of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent (i.e., the allied and supposedly «favored» parent), who is using the child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child's relationship with the other parent is the direct result of the pathogenic parenting practices of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent (i.e., the allied and supposedly «favored» parent), who is using the
child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child in a role - reversal relationship as a «regulatory other» (see my blog essay: Parental Alienation as
Child Abuse: The Regulating Other) for the psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) pa
Child Abuse: The Regulating Other)
for the
psychopathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) parent.
While it is possible that judges may still not order a protective separation, it will be extremely hard
for them not to order a protective separation when ALL mental health professionals are giving the
child a DSM - 5 diagnosis of V995.57 Child Psychological Abuse, Confirmed, and the entire field of professional psychology is saying that the child's treatment REQUIRES the child's protective separation from the psychopathology of the allied and supposedly favored narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child a DSM - 5 diagnosis of V995.57
Child Psychological Abuse, Confirmed, and the entire field of professional psychology is saying that the child's treatment REQUIRES the child's protective separation from the psychopathology of the allied and supposedly favored narcissistic / (borderline) pa
Child Psychological Abuse, Confirmed, and the entire field of professional psychology is saying that the
child's treatment REQUIRES the child's protective separation from the psychopathology of the allied and supposedly favored narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child's treatment REQUIRES the
child's protective separation from the psychopathology of the allied and supposedly favored narcissistic / (borderline) pa
child's protective separation from the
psychopathology of the allied and supposedly favored narcissistic / (borderline) parent.
An official publication of the International Society
for Research in
Child and Adolescent
Psychopathology
And the typical justification
for this insane collusion with
psychopathology is that they're «giving the
child a safe place to talk about their feelings.»
In the 30 years since its inception, Gardner's model of PAS has failed to provide a solution to «parental alienation»
for the countless parents who continue to lose their
children to the
psychopathology of a narcissistic / (borderline) parent.
,
Children of depressed parents: Alternative pathways to risk
for psychopathology (pp. 277 - 305).
Therapy
for attachment - based «parental alienation» REQUIRES the
child's protective separation from the pathology of the narcissistic / (borderline) parent during the active phase of treatment and recovery stabilization from the role - reversal relationship with the narcissistic / (borderline) parent in which the
child is being used as a «regulatory object» by the narcissistic / (borderline) parent
for the
psychopathology of this parent.
In the
child's relationship with a narcissistic / (borderline) parent, the
child becomes a «regulating other»
for the
psychopathology of the parent.
The study of stress and competence in
children: A building block
for developmental
psychopathology
Child psychopathology was rated by the
children's mothers using the German version of the
Child Behavior Checklist
for the Preschool Age (CBCL / 1.5 — 5; [24, 25]-RRB-.