The firm is also ranked
for its environmental litigation work, appearing in «Band 2» for Alabama.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential
for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences
for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals
for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand
for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price
for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and
environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate
for our additional capital needs or
for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future
litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions
for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities
for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017),
environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related
litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
This was driven in part by the rise of public interest
litigation — think,
for example, of an
environmental group finding a third - party plaintiff to sue a company to stop an environmentally sensitive development project.
Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to the impact of: adverse general economic and related factors, such as fluctuating or increasing levels of unemployment, underemployment and the volatility of fuel prices, declines in the securities and real estate markets, and perceptions of these conditions that decrease the level of disposable income of consumers or consumer confidence; adverse events impacting the security of travel, such as terrorist acts, armed conflict and threats thereof, acts of piracy, and other international events; the risks and increased costs associated with operating internationally; our expansion into and investments in new markets; breaches in data security or other disturbances to our information technology and other networks; the spread of epidemics and viral outbreaks; adverse incidents involving cruise ships; changes in fuel prices and / or other cruise operating costs; any impairment of our tradenames or goodwill; our hedging strategies; our inability to obtain adequate insurance coverage; our substantial indebtedness, including the ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and to generate the necessary amount of cash to service our existing debt; restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness that limit our flexibility in operating our business; the significant portion of our assets pledged as collateral under our existing debt agreements and the ability of our creditors to accelerate the repayment of our indebtedness; volatility and disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, which may adversely affect our ability to borrow and could increase our counterparty credit risks, including those under our credit facilities, derivatives, contingent obligations, insurance contracts and new ship progress payment guarantees; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; overcapacity in key markets or globally; our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel or the loss of key personnel; future changes relating to how external distribution channels sell and market our cruises; our reliance on third parties to provide hotel management services to certain ships and certain other services; delays in our shipbuilding program and ship repairs, maintenance and refurbishments; future increases in the price of, or major changes or reduction in, commercial airline services; seasonal variations in passenger fare rates and occupancy levels at different times of the year; our ability to keep pace with developments in technology; amendments to our collective bargaining agreements
for crew members and other employee relation issues; the continued availability of attractive port destinations; pending or threatened
litigation, investigations and enforcement actions; changes involving the tax and
environmental regulatory regimes in which we operate; and other factors set forth under «Risk Factors» in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and subsequent filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Thanks to
Environmental Litigation Group, P.C.
for starting this kindness campaign and sponsoring this post.
BetaNYC · Brennan Center at NYU Law · Citizens Union · Civic Hall · Common Cause NY · Consumers Union · First Amendment Coalition · Just Leadership USA · League of Women Voters of NYS · New York Press Club · Tri-State Transportation Campaign · National Freedom of Information Coalition · New York Civil Liberties Union · NYPIRG · Pace
Environmental Litigation Clinic · Reinvent Albany · Represent.us · Riverkeeper · Sunlight Foundation · Tully Center
for Free Speech
For weeks before the hearing,
environmental groups campaigned to urge lawmakers to block Pruitt's nomination, saying his
litigation as Oklahoma attorney general may have been influenced by energy companies and industry groups that contributed to his election campaigns.
Among other things, the service says,
environmental litigation severely hampers efforts to list more species by siphoning off money
for legal costs.
«These cases and court decisions are unfortunately a regular feature of the legal landscape,» says Drew Caputo, vice president of
litigation for lands, wildlife and oceans at
environmental law firm Earthjustice.
Birmingham, AL About Blog
For over 20 years the hardworking lawyers at
Environmental Litigation Group, P.C. have built a practice dedicated to asbestos litigation and to
Litigation Group, P.C. have built a practice dedicated to asbestos
litigation and to
litigation and toxic torts.
Rather, the real choice is between regulatory chaos and legislation that fixes the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act, and the National
Environmental Policy Act so that pro-Kyoto
litigation groups can not use those statutes
for a purpose that Congress never intended — to dictate climate and energy policy
for the nation.
It was, of course, a man under the fur: Brendan Cummings, a lawyer and public lands director
for the Center
for Biological Diversity, one of the
environmental groups that used
litigation to force the Department of the Interior to consider listing polar bears under the Endangered Species Act as threatened (which it did).
I understand why traditional
environmental groups stick with
litigation as a lever but I see other approaches, particularly building local support
for biological vitality and other
environmental assets, as more effective in the long haul.
Adding foreign companies to the
litigation is a tactical maneuver to keep the dispute out of state court, where the cities have more favorable prospects, and force it into federal court, said Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel
for the
environmental law group Our Children's Trust, which isn't involved in the case.
On the agenda of ALEC's closed - door Energy, Environment, and Agriculture task force meeting is a model «
Environmental Impact Litigation Act» that would allow companies to pay into a fund for the state to sue against environmental laws including the C
Environmental Impact
Litigation Act» that would allow companies to pay into a fund
for the state to sue against
environmental laws including the C
environmental laws including the Clean Air Act.
The proposed ALEC model «
Environmental Impact Litigation Act,» based on a law passed in North Dakota in 2015, would allow coal, oil, and gas companies to pay into a fund for the state to sue against a number of key federal environmental laws, including the C
Environmental Impact
Litigation Act,» based on a law passed in North Dakota in 2015, would allow coal, oil, and gas companies to pay into a fund
for the state to sue against a number of key federal
environmental laws, including the C
environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act.
An amendment passed this May made it so resource corporations working in Papua New Guinea are protected from any
litigation related to
environmental destruction, labor laws, and landowner abuse, essentially placing all
environmental safeguards with a government that is cozy with industry and opening the door
for environmental disaster.
The George Mason
Environmental Law Clinic, or Free Market Environnental Law Clinic (FMELC), operates as
litigation counsel
for E&E Legal.
Her advocacy background includes working
for Greenpeace fighting coal export proposals in the western U.S, as a staff attorney at the Center
for Biological Diversity, and as a
litigation fellow at the Pacific
Environmental Advocacy Center (now EarthRise Law Center).
Miranda Leppla Clean Energy Attorney, Ohio
Environmental Council Prior to joining the OEC, Miranda was in private practice
for several years where her practice focused on
litigation, natural gas utility issues, and utility - scale wind farm permitting.
Back in 2012, the
environmental activists now leading the climate
litigation campaign met in La Jolla, Calif., to strategize how to convince government officials to demonize and ultimately prosecute energy companies
for causing global warming.
On the one hand, the negative
environmental impact, in particular
for fish species in the Elbe river, has led to
litigation opposing the authorisation of the plant, including these infringement proceedings before the ECJ.
We have represented many education institutions
for many years in a vast variety of civil
litigation matters, including contract disputes, construction disputes, building envelope and
environmental separation concerns, maintenance of capital structures, labour issues, defamation, judicial review, and providing defence to educators.
Best Lawyers in America
for Commercial
Litigation and
Litigation — Real Estate (2013 - present) Best Lawyers in America — 2016 Lawyer of the Year
for Real Estate in Billings, MT Best Lawyers In America — 2017 Lawyer of the Year
for Real Estate and Commercial
Litigation Mountain States Super Lawyers (2014 - Present) AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale - Hubbell Order of Barristers Award Edward A. Cremer, III
Environmental Law Award Member, Montana Law Review Member, National Moot Court Team Clyde Augustus Duniway Award
for Outstanding Student Achievement (Colorado College)
«Johnny is a pioneer in
environmental litigation and has laid the foundation
for the future of
environmental law,» said Lightfoot managing partner Wynn Shuford.
Our
environmental disputes lawyers combine experience in
litigation and dispute resolution with a deep knowledge of
environmental law and the
environmental regulatory regimes to secure the best outcomes
for our clients.
The group, which also includes professionals in the firm's Washington, Chicago and Phoenix offices, has handled
litigation in more than 30 states in cases ranging from putative nationwide class actions and mass actions
for personal injury and property damage to complex
environmental investigation and / or remediation issues and matters involving multiple defendants and hundreds of products.
Our team comprises lawyers across the firm's practices, including
litigation, employment, corporate, and
environmental, who have worked
for the government and the private sector.
Steptoe's toxic tort
litigation practice, which was recognized in the 2014 and 2015 editions of The Legal 500 US
for providing «exceptional skill and service,» defends toxic tort, product liability and
environmental claims nationwide
for the chemical, petrochemical, aerospace, manufacturing, and agricultural industries.
Twelve Jennings Haug Cunningham Partners Recognized as 2018 Best Lawyers in America (August 22, 2017) Jennings Haug Cunningham is pleased to announce that twelve of the firm's partners were named to The Best Lawyers in America ® 2018 list, a peer - review ranking publication
for the legal profession, in the areas of construction law and
litigation,
environmental law and
litigation, insurance law, personal injury, arbitration and mediation.
Schiff Hardin is recognized
for its strong
litigation and transactional work and its cutting - edge intellectual property,
environmental, and construction practices.
Bick Law is widely recognized in California and throughout the nation
for our top - tier
environmental litigation practice.
The concept of mass torts
litigation is unfamiliar to many people, but it can be an important and beneficial legal option
for people who have been injured by defective products, toxic
environmental exposure, or other types of incidents in which one person or company might be responsible
for numerous injuries.
It includes federal, state, international and tribal laws and regulations; court and agency decisions; agency documents and databases; resources
for environmental compliance; materials relating to enforcement and
litigation; and resources having to do with
environmental aspects of real estate and corporate transactions.
Our Miami trial lawyers have wide - ranging experience in
litigation, arbitration, mediation and alternative dispute resolution
for civil, commercial, banking, energy, corporate, tax, real estate,
environmental, intellectual property, administrative and labor law disputes.
On a national level, Max is often retained to reexamine defense strategies and to develop new defenses based on epidemiological, toxicological, and
environmental analyses
for clients which have been in toxic tort and
environmental litigation for decades.
The firm's 23 attorneys focus in areas of insurance defense, financial institution
litigation,
environmental law, construction and contract
litigation, surety and fidelity law, lawyer and professional liability, complex civil
litigation, personal injury, employment, family law and domestic relations, probate and estate planning, and municipal risk
litigation for businesses and individuals.
She has practiced
environmental law
for more than 25 years and represents clients in project development, regulatory compliance and
litigation matters under state and federal laws.
He is on the Leaders Forum of the American Association
for Justice (AAJ) and belongs to the Products, Professional Negligence, Motor Vehicle, and Toxic,
Environmental — Pharmaceutical Sections of AAJ, and to the Birth Trauma
Litigation Group, the Medical Negligence Information Exchange Group, and the Brain Injury Association.
«A really big thing
for us is TDS can do just about everything,» he adds, citing the need to provide clients services in areas such as cross-border matters, major
litigation, tax,
environmental law, collective agreements, intellectual property, and immigration.
Paul Feldman is noted
for his broad
litigation practice, which includes deep expertise in real estate and
environmental litigation.
His
litigation practice focuses on the defense of toxic tort, occupational diseases, and
environmental claims alleging bodily injury and property damage
for both individual and mass tort claims.
Seven major practice areas — corporate, energy and
environmental, financial services, intellectual property,
litigation, real estate and tax — provide the framework
for an extensive range of focus areas.
Before joining West Coast
Environmental Law, Jessica worked as a facilitator, popular educator and organizer
for a variety of non-profits, at a Vancouver
litigation firm, and as a law clerk to the British Columbia Supreme Court.
Britt K. Strottman, one of California's most successful
environmental legal advocates for public entities, joined Baron & Budd's Environmental Litigation Group as a shareho
environmental legal advocates
for public entities, joined Baron & Budd's
Environmental Litigation Group as a shareho
Environmental Litigation Group as a shareholder in 2018.
Attorneys named «Best Lawyers» 2018 Tulsa Lawyers of the Year» were Mary Quinn Cooper
for product liability
litigation defense, Charles Greenough
for banking and finance
litigation, Robert J. Joyce
for environmental law, and Robert E. Spoo
for copyright law.
Among other areas, our
litigation experience in the
environmental area includes governmental and private - party actions under CERCLA (including serving as lead counsel
for PRP groups at major Superfund sites throughout the United States), citizen suits under RCRA, the Clean Water Act and other
environmental laws, claims
for property damage and personal injury arising from industrial emissions or
environmental contamination, and defending clients against state and federal governmental enforcement actions.
We have a track record
for success in resolving real estate disputes, estate
litigation,
environmental contamination claims, insurance claims and many other disputes.
Business Development: Brokering various business dealings that further the diversification of Indian economies Developing and accessing commercial financial programs and services
for tribal governments, including tax - exempt offerings and federally - guaranteed housing loans Serving as issuer or underwriter's counsel in tribal bond issuances Ensuring tribal compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and other federal financial regulatory requirements Handling federal and state income, excise, B&O, property and other tax matters
for tribes and tribal businesses Chartering tribal business enterprises under tribal, state and federal law Registering and protecting tribal trademarks and copyrights Negotiating franchise agreements
for restaurants and retail stores on Indian reservations Custom - tailoring construction contracts
for tribes and general contractors Helping secure federal SBA 8 (a) and other contracting preferences
for Indian - owned businesses Facilitating contractual relations between tribes and tribal casinos, and gaming vendors Building tribal workers» compensation and self - insurance programs Government Relations: Handling state and federal regulatory matters in the areas of tribal gaming,
environmental and cultural resources, workers» compensation, taxation, health care and education Negotiating tribal - state gaming compacts and fuel and cigarette compacts, and inter-local land use and law enforcement agreements Advocacy before the Washington State Gambling Commission, Washington Indian Gaming Association and National Indian Gaming Commission Preparing tribal codes and regulations, including tribal court, commercial, gaming, taxation, energy development,
environmental and cultural resources protection, labor & employment, and workers» compensation laws Developing employee handbooks, manuals and personnel policies Advocacy in areas of treaty rights, gaming, jurisdiction, taxation,
environmental and cultural resource protection Brokering fee - to - trust and related real estate and jurisdictional transactions
Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting trib
Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law
litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting trib
litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and
litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting trib
litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal rights.