Sentences with phrase «for ethical review»

The resulting course, «Reviewing Genomics Research,» was officially launched at the 2012 Forum for Ethical Review Committees in the Asian & Western Pacific Region (FERCAP), where it was well received.

Not exact matches

3 Investing in Ethical Corporate Culture: The Imperative for Instituting an Anti-Corruption Compliance Program for Canadian Businesses Venturing Overseas, Osler Corporate Review, June 2010.

3 See Osler Corporate Review dated June 2010 «Investing in Ethical Corporate Culture: The Imperative for Instituting an Anti-Corruption Compliance Program for Canadian Businesses Venturing Overseas»

CFPB is reviewing its «Ethical foundation for CFP certification.»

I've also posted a review and giveaway for SongCroft Naturals skin care products, which are handmade on an organic permaculture farm, and are safe, ethical and effective!

Ethical approval Ethical approval was obtained from an ethics committee created for the North American Registry of Midwives to review epidemiological research involving certified professional midwives.

As a pediatric professional, you are certainly very entitled to your opinions but I think it would be fair and ethical to note that the NICH, AAP, First Candle / SIDS Alliance, CJ Foundation for SIDS and hundreds of experts and child fatality review teams that deal with infant death every across the US would disagree with your statements.

The PSI Research Committee has reviewed study summaries and ethical procedures, and have approved these studies for inclusion on our website.

An outside review of New York's $ 150 billion pension fund for public workers shows it fixed ethical problems that led to a «pay - for - play» scandal.

The recommended rules, announced during the Gaming Commission's meeting on Monday, stemmed from their own review of an undercover investigation that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, conducted in 2013 at Saratoga Race Course.

The new rules state that stem cells can be used if they are part of a study approved by the federal government, or if the protocol has been approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) that provides ethical review for research involving human volunReview Board (IRB) that provides ethical review for research involving human volunreview for research involving human volunteers.

He says that the manuscript went through two rounds of review over eight months — twice as long as is normal for the journal — and that he urged the researchers to discuss the ethical issues surrounding germline editing in the paper.

Four U.S. representatives — prompted by an aggressive ad campaign by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which claimed that baby rhesus macaques at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development lab of Stephen Suomi were being ripped from their mothers at birth and being mentally traumatized — called on NIH to conduct a bioethical review of the lab.

The research in the current study is fully compliant with recommendations made in that document, and adheres closely to guidelines established by OHSU's Institutional Review Board and additional ad - hoc committees set up for scientific and ethical rReview Board and additional ad - hoc committees set up for scientific and ethical reviewreview.

This study was approved the by the University of California, San Diego Institutional Review Board (IRB Project 140072) and conformed to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (54).

Ethical review panels may be hesitant to approve the use of a dosage that exceeds the LOAEL, funding agencies may be hesitant to provide the funds needed for such study, and study subjects themselves may have or develop reservations that could lead to poor study compliance.

The American Society of Plant Biologists expects members of the Society and all individuals involved in the peer review and publication of its journals to maintain high ethical standards for scholarship.

This study was approved by the regional ethical review board of Gothenburg, Sweden, which issued a waiver regarding the need for patient informed consent.

The total size of the graduate cohort was 279 students (i.e., all students in the cohort participated in the leadership course); a 100 % response rate was obtained for part 1 of the study, which was done in accordance with the standards of the local ethical review board.

Designed for those responsible for reviewing genomics research projects, the course: defines genomic research; examines the types of research questions being addressed; illustrates how genomic research differs from other types of research; and, introduces specific ethical considerations when reviewing...

This work complies with the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour / Animal Behaviour Society guidelines for the use of animals in research, and received approval from the Ethical Review Committee at the University of Sussex.

In partnership with Global Health Reviewers, the MRC Centre for Genomics and Global Health (CGGH) developed an online course «Reviewing Genomics Research» that introduces unique aspects of genomics research and explores the ethical issues that arise from these types of studies.

All patient material for this study was collected after obtaining written informed consent from participants and an ethical vote approving the study (Institutional Review Board: Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Germany / Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg) according to ICGC guidelines (www.icgc.org).

An investigation related to this research has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Institutet.

Follow Chic Éthique for outfit posts, green beauty reviews, my favorite ethical brands, thrift hauls, and more!

I am definitely still working on this, but I think that the only way to truly overcome it is by thoroughly examining ones motivations and closet, and some good ethical - fashion reading material wouldn't hurt (thanks for the many reviews and recommendations)!

Follow Chic Éthique for outfit posts, green beauty reviews, my favorite ethical brands, thrift hauls, and more!

Fox announces their distrust of critics with this title by splaying «Property of 20th Century Fox Publicity Department» in huge letters across the screen for the duration of the film on both sides of the disc (the first time a major studio has done so since DreamWorks sent out advanced copies of the Gladiator Signature Selection in 2000 — which is why you never saw a review of it at FILM FREAK CENTRAL), in turn prohibiting an ethical assessment of the image.

The lessons included are outlined as follows: Lesson 1 - Abortion (Comparing Christian & Buddhist Views) Lesson 2 - Abortion (Buddhist Views) Lesson 3 - Euthanasia (Buddhist Views) Lesson 4 - Euthanasia (Comparing Christian & Buddhist Views) Lesson 5 - Animal Experimentation Lesson 6 - Unit Overview Lesson 7 - Unit Overview It also contains three bonus resources: - The GCSE Buddhism Ethical Debate Generator - GCSE Buddhism Learning Mats - A PLC (Personal, Learning Checklist) for this unit Positive reviews are warmly welcome!

Today, I would like to reply to this question because I am annoyed to hear writers and authors wonder if is it ethical or unethical to pay for being reviewed.

You can contact a company like ReadingDeals.com to contact readers, bloggers, and reviewers for a nominal admin fee — the reviews are honest and not guaranteed to be positive, which makes it fair and ethical.

In addition to reviewing the existing literature on elective placements, the authors outline a potential model for the future development of ethical elective placements.

All Acting Vs. Writing Advertising Apps For Writers Art Author Collectives Banning Books Blogging Blog Tours Book Cover Design Book Marketing Booksellers Branding Character Development Character - Driven Fiction Christian Erotica Clichés In Writing Co-Authoring Construction Coping With Anxiety Coping With Rejection Letters Copyright Copyright Infringement Copywriting Creating A Business Plan Dealing With Fear Defining Success Depression Developing Setting Drug & / or Alcohol Abuse Editing Vs. Writing Editors Education Entrepreneurial Skills Ethical Issues In Fiction Evoking Emotion Expat Writers Fame Fantasy Finding Inspiration Finding Your Voice Follow Your Dreams For Aspiring Writers For Indie Authors Gender Issues Genre Getting Published Ghostwriting Grief Handling Critique Historical Fiction Horror Stories In Publishing Interdisciplinary Art Karma Lit Killing Off Characters Learning From Mistakes LGBT LGBT Literature Literary Adaptations Literary Journals Lyrics Mailing Lists Marketing Memoir Metaphysical Lit Multicultural Fiction Music Music Vs. Writing Nonfiction Nonfiction To Fiction Nurturing Creativity Packaging Advice Perfectionism Photography Playwriting Plotting Poetry Political Art Pornography Protagonist Development Public Speaking Publishing Religion Research Romance Novels Self - doubt Selfpublishing Setting Goals Social Effects Of Fiction Social Media Social Networking Spiritual Lit Staying Motivated Stereotypes Success Taking Care Of Yourself Taking Risks Target Audience Thrillers Time Management Time Travel Traditional Publishing Trilogy Trust Your Instincts Truth In Fiction Twitter For Writers Typesetting Websites Work / Life Balance Writer Quirks Writer's Block Writers» Conference Writer's Life Writing Advice Writing A Series Writing As Therapy Writing Book Reviews Writing Craft Writing Dialects Writing Erotica Writing For A Living Writing For Children Writing (General) Writing Groups Writing In A Foreign Language Writing Playlists Writing Sequels Writing Vs. Medicine Writing Workshops Writing Yourself Into Your Characters Youth Arts Youth Education

I'm sure less ethical marketers could go on Fiverr.com and pay for positive reviews; however, getting this type of feedback from actual project managers further validates the book and also helps sell the book.

In that case, there's nothing wrong with paying for a review from an ethical review source or paying for blog tours or blasts, as long as we're braced to accept those honest reviews won't all be 5 stars.

«Do you think this dodges the ethical issues around an author paying for a review?»

Now, I suppose you are also wondering if at this stage it is ethical to pay for review.

I am interested in finding an ethical and established service that would increase the number of Amazon reviews for my books.

I think when it comes down to it, authors really must approach this from the highest ethical standpoint, and that is: don't ask your friends to review your books on Amazon or other sites — at all, even for no compensation.

Follow Chic Éthique for outfit posts, green beauty reviews, my favorite ethical brands, thrift hauls, and more!

Follow Chic Éthique for outfit posts, green beauty reviews, my favorite ethical brands, thrift hauls, and more!

awards research enabling grant $ 7500.00, university of north texas, 2010 junior faculty fellowship $ 5000.00, university of north texas, 2010 purchase award, 1st national bank, columbia, mo 2008 fellowship, vermont studio artist colony, vt 2000 jessie rickly award, st. louis artist guild, st. louis, mo 1996 graduate fellowship, university of washington, seattle, wa 1990 national fine art award, binney and smith, usa 1988 bibliography • light and depth at bruno david by ivy cooper, special to the beacon november 11, 2008 • laura beard, catalog, bruno david gallery, essay by charles schwall, november 2008 • fresh paint, fresh faces, inaugural columbia invitational, courtesy of jason pollen by ladan nikravan vox magazine, october 9, 2008 • comments and reviews of visual art, st. louis: open studios tour by rob miller 2008 • perception / abstraction, laura beard aeling and gary passanise, by megan peters, the review, 2007 • varied show of bold abstracts revels in the joy of paint by teresa callahan, west end word, october 2004 • contemporary moves by sydney norton, west end word, october 2004 • laura beard aeling - winterkill at the st. louis ethical society by jeff daniels, art critic of the st. louis post dispatch, february 23, 2003 • something for everyone, by kate hackmen, kansas city star, june 29, 2001 «fresh raises expectations for the new», by caprice stapley of the review, july 2001, vol 3, # 9 • abstraction for the sensory overload by ben shockey, the review, 2001 • driven to abstraction by robin trafton, kansas city star, march 30, 2001 • landscape go in all directions by jeff daniels, art critic of the st. louis post dispatch, july 9, 2000 • this just in... painting still alive by jeff daniels, art critic of the st. louis post dispatch, summer 2000 • excavations: new paintings by laura beard aeling by jeff daniels, art critic of the st. louis post dispatch, mar. 19, 2000 • new american paintings volume 23, 1999 (national distribution) •: surreptitions by jeff daniels, art critic for st. louis post dispatch, april 1998 • extirpate by jeff daniels, art critic of st. louis post dispatch, december 17, 1997 • extirpate by eddie silva, art critic of the river front times, december 1997 • route 66 brings real art to life by Stephen weeks, the independent, september, 22, 1992 • artist converge for route 66 revisited exhibit by stephen weeks, the independent, gallup, nm, september 18, 1992 • route 66 art show a must see at red mesa by gaye brown, the gallup gazette, 1992 • primarily paint at the laguna gloria art museum laguna gloria art museum, 1990

Certainly skeptics have criticized their work, but Gleason and Monnett, as Clynes must surely know, came under review by the Obama Administration (certainly not a hotbed for sympathy towards skeptics) mainly for ethical lapses around reporting and use of funds.

The Stern Review has been criticized by more conservative mainstream economists, including William Nordhaus, for its ethical choices, which, it is claimed, place too much emphasis on the future as opposed to present - day values by adopting a much lower discount rate on future costs and benefits as compared to other, more standard economic treatments such as that of Nordhaus.

Pachauri, Rajendra, 6, 30, 56, 146, 156 Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), 68 - 69, 240 Pacific Ocean, 58, 62, 68 - 69, 74, 102, 116, 140 Packard Foundation, 175 Pakistan, 1 Palmer, Andy, 213 Parker, Kevin, 13 Pasteur Institute, 136 Peak oil, 220 - 221, 244 Peer review, 4, 62, 66, 82, 88, 131, 155 - 158, 162, 167 Pell, George, 227 Pelley, Scott, 141 Pelosi, Nancy, 17 Pennsylvania State University, 128 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 30 Peru, 67 - 68 Peterson, Thomas, 162 Petroleum (see oil) Pew Center, 115 Pew Charitable Trusts, 12 Photosynthesis, 77, 131 pH Scale, 139 Pielke Sr., Roger, 148 Poland, 225 - 226 Polar bear, 1, 16, 24, 103, 136 - 138, 144, 186, 228, 231, 236, 240, 246 Politico, 175 Pollution, 21, 38 - 40, 49, 129, 133, 135, 139, 209 - 210, 225 carbon, 2, 128, 130, 132, 138, 144 Population, 32 - 33, 37, 39, 143, 184, 186 Porritt, Jonathan, 31 Power Hungry, 195 Prescott, John, 35 President's Climate Commitment, 12 Princeton University, 64, 74, 132 Propaganda, climate, 12 Proposition 23, 128 Public Broadcasting Station (PBS), 106 Public Service Company in Colorado, 199 Pugh, Lewis Gordon, 111 Purdue University, 174

Full Dana disclosure: I wasn't there when he was caught foisting his clairvoyant «review» of HSI on unsuspecting Amazon users, but I've yet to see any indication of a moral / ethical awakening in him since then, and for all I know there will never be one.

These omissions included: (a) the lack of recognition that dependence on natural gas as a bridge fuel for reducing the US carbon footprint raises several ethical questions, a matter reviewed here in detail, (b) acknowledgment of the US special responsibility for climate change for its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Equifor reducing the US carbon footprint raises several ethical questions, a matter reviewed here in detail, (b) acknowledgment of the US special responsibility for climate change for its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of ethical questions, a matter reviewed here in detail, (b) acknowledgment of the US special responsibility for climate change for its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Equifor climate change for its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Equifor its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Equifor over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of EquiFor US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis of Equity.

The study was approved by the Yale Institutional Review Boards for ethical research (Human Research Protection Program) and participants signed a consent form with the sampling company (SSI) through which they chose to participate.

«Unfortunately for this option, we have recently learned (through the kind intervention of Nielsen - Gammon here), that, even in the case of open review comments, ethical standards within the climate science community forbid speculation on the identity of Reviewer # 2»

This post reviews the Cancun outcome through an ethical lens in light of the overall responsibility of those nations that are exceeding their fair share of safe global emissions in regard to their duties: (a) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to levels necessary to prevent harm to others, (b) to reduce greenhouse gas emission to levels consistent with what is each nation's fair share of total global emissions, and (c) to provide financing for adaptation measures and other necessary responses to climate change harms for those who are most vulnerable and least responsible for climate change.