Not exact matches
The Getting to Yes report prepared
for the CLLN and ABC under the
joint Advancing Workplace Learning Project, found that
employers who offered WLES training and integrated WLES into their businesses reported improved employee confidence, better communication and teamwork, new or improved skills, greater interest in further learning, improved morale and employees who can take on other jobs.
When companies decide they don't want to be
joint employers and share the costs, the sole blame
for that job loss will rest with the regulators at the NLRB, who put politics ahead of sound economics.
On partisan lines, the National Labor Relations Board this week changed the way it defines a
joint employer, essentially holding large franchises like McDonald's responsible
for the employees that work
for individual franchisees.
The Browning - Ferris decision builds on a previous memo from July 2014, in which the board said McDonald's Corp. could be held accountable as a
joint -
employer for its franchise owners» activities and any labor disputes they may have.
McDonald's has continued to contest its status as a
joint employer, arguing that it can't be held accountable
for the actions of independent franchisees.
In July 2014, the NLRB stated that McDonald's could be considered a
joint employer, meaning it could be directly involved — and therefore liable
for — the control and supervision of employee activity at any of its franchised locations.
In July, the National Labor Relations Board defined McDonald's as a
joint employer in lawsuits against the company, a designation that could force the franchisor to take responsibility
for workers» wages.
Like the July 2015 recommendation, the February release aimed to ensure greater accountability
for employers by stating the importance of expanding the number of scenarios in which
joint employer relationships exist.
«If allowed to go into effect, the impact of this new
joint -
employer rule would be sweeping and widespread, create havoc
for the franchise industry and, ultimately, would inflict serious damage to our nation's economy.»
A company that uses a contractor
for janitorial services,
for example, could be considered a
joint employer because it exerts direct control.
Proponents say redefining who qualifies as a
joint employer could lift the veil on abusive corporate practices that make it hard
for franchisees to operate and
for their workers to organize in the first place.
And
for individual franchisees, a ruling in favor of
joint employer status would mean they are no longer independent business owners and more beholden to corporate rules.
Between 50 and 70
employers and veteran service organizations will be available
for a free veterans networking event hosted by Operation: GoodJobs at the American Lake Conference Center on
Joint Base Lewis - McChord Wednesday from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Additionally, if you interact with Fidelity directly as an individual investor (including
joint account holders) or if Fidelity provides services to your
employer or plan sponsor, we may exchange certain information about you with Fidelity financial services affiliates, such as our brokerage and insurance companies,
for their use in marketing products and services as allowed by law.
For a traditional IRA, full deductibility of a contribution for 2017 for those who participate in an employer - sponsored retirement savings plan is available for those who are married and whose 2017 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $ 99,000 or less, or for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
For a traditional IRA, full deductibility of a contribution
for 2017 for those who participate in an employer - sponsored retirement savings plan is available for those who are married and whose 2017 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $ 99,000 or less, or for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
for 2017
for those who participate in an employer - sponsored retirement savings plan is available for those who are married and whose 2017 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $ 99,000 or less, or for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
for those who participate in an
employer - sponsored retirement savings plan is available
for those who are married and whose 2017 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $ 99,000 or less, or for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
for those who are married and whose 2017 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $ 99,000 or less, or
for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
for those who are single and whose 2017 MAGI is $ 62,000 or less, with partial deductibility
for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (joint) or $ 72,000 (singl
for MAGI up to $ 119,000 (
joint) or $ 72,000 (single).
But instead of a
joint announcement, Christopher Wylie awoke early Saturday in London, where he lives, to the news that Facebook had published a blog post announcing the suspensions of him, his former
employer and one other person
for allegedly mishandling Facebook data in an incident that happened in 2014 and had been known to Facebook
for more than a year.
House Republicans advanced a bill to roll back longstanding «
joint employer» protections
for workers contracted by big companies.
SEIU alleges McDonald's shares responsibility
for employees with franchisees as a
joint -
employer.
A workshop using this kit as the basis
for discussion was conducted at the
joint UTLC (United Trades and Labour Council) and SAECCI (South Australian
Employers» Chamber of Commerce and Industry) Occupational Health and Safety Conference «Working Together» at the Adelaide Convention Centre in April 2000.
House
Joint Resolution 145 (2002) encourages
employers to recognize the benefits of breastfeeding and to provide unpaid break time and appropriate space
for employees to breastfeed or express milk.
At 1 p.m., Assemblywoman Sandy Galef, Sen. David Carlucci and others announce
joint legislation aimed at closing the pay gap
for women and minorities by prohibiting
employers from inquiring about salary history information, LCA Room 130, Legislative Office Building, Albany.
Inc. • Ambient Environmnental, Inc. • API New York • BlueRock Energy • Buffalo Niagara Partnership • Capital Region Chamber of Commerce • Central Hudson • Chautauqua County Chamber of Commerce • Chemung County Chamber of Commerce • Constitution Pipeline • Cortland County Chamber of Commerce • D.A. Collins • Delaware Engineering • Dominion Energy • Eastern NY District Council of Laborers • Energy Coalition of New York • Energy Equipment and Infrastructure Alliance • EnergyMark, LLC • Engineers Labor -
Employer Cooperative (ELEC 825) • General Contractors Association of NY • Hudson Valley Building & Construction Trades Council • Independent Oil & Gas Association of NY (IOGA - NY) • Independent Power Producers of NY (IPPNY) • International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825 (IOUE 825) • Iroquois • IUOE Local 825 •
Joint Landowners Coalition • Laborers District Council of Eastern NY • Laborers Local 17 LECET Fund • Manufacturers Association of the Southern Tier • Millennium Pipeline • National Fuel Gas Company • National Federation of Independent Business • North Country Chamber of Commerce • NYS Building & Construction Trades Council • NYS Conference of the International Union of Operating Engineers • NYS Economic Development Council • NYS LECET Fund (Laborers -
Employers Cooperation & Education Trust) • Orange County Partnership • Otsego County IDA • Penn - York Land Services Corp. • Unshackle Upstate • Upstate New York Laborers District Council • U.S Chamber of Commerce's Institute
for 21st Century Energy • USA Compression • Williams Pipeline.
In 1997, Meier served on a
joint Senate - Assembly Energy Conference Committee which developed the «Power
for Jobs» program, an agreement intended to provide low - cost power to
employers in New York State.
According to a
joint report from the Department
for Business, the CBI and the TUC, entitled Reps in Action the work of union representatives actually saves
employers around # 1.1 billion annually by helping to resolve disputes and preventing illness and injury at work - ten times more that the # 113 million that Norman claims union representatives cost the taxpayer.
Up to the last minute the
joint trade unions have sought meaningful discussions with the government, the
employers response has been at best bizarre as they criticise the unions
for seeking talks to avert strike action:
On behalf of The Business Council and its 2,400
employer members, I would like to thank you
for this opportunity to address the
joint Senate and Assembly hearing on the Executive Budget.
«Instead of reaching out to union leaders to gain consensus on an affordable housing program that ensures middle - class wages
for workers, (de Blasio) coordinated with a lobbying group — led by billionaire developers — to run an anti-union campaign that would lead to unsafe job sites and a low - wage workforce,» The Greater New York Laborers -
Employers Cooperation and Education Trust and the New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor Management Corporation said in a
joint statement.
(d) It shall be an unlawful employment practice
for any
employer, labor organization, or
joint labor - management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on - the - job training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, (1) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice
for an
employer to hire and employ employees,
for an employment agency to classify, or refer
for employment any individual,
for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer
for employment any individual, or
for an
employer, labor organization, or
joint labor - management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise, and (2) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice
for a school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.
(d) The term «labor organization» means a labor organization engaged in an industry affecting commerce, and any agent of such an organization, and includes any organization of any kind, any agency, or employee representation committee, group, association, or plan so engaged in which employees participate and which exists
for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with
employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours, or other terms or conditions of employment, and any conference, general committee,
joint or system board, or
joint council so engaged which is subordinate to a national or international labor organization.
Any
employer, employment agency, labor organization, or
joint labor - management committee which believes that the application to it of any regulation or order issued under this section would result in undue hardship may (1) apply to the Commission
for an exemption from the application of such regulation or order, or (2) bring a civil action in the United States district court
for the district where such records are kept.
(D) The term «labor organization» means a labor organization engaged in an industry affecting commerce, and any agent of such an organization, and includes any organization of any kind, any agency, or employee representation committee, group, association, or plan so engaged in which employees participate and which exists
for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with
employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours, or other terms or conditions of employment, and any conference, general committee,
joint or system board, or
joint council so engaged which subordinate to a national or international labor organization.
OTOH if FICA+SECA income exceeds $ 200k single or $ 250k
joint you owe Additional Medicare tax 0.9 % on the excess; if your W - 2 income (alone) exceeds this limit your
employer should withhold
for it.
The deduction available to active participants in
employer - sponsored retirement plans is phased out on a sliding scale
for individual taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income between $ 63,000 - $ 73,000, and
for joint filers with modified adjusted gross income between $ 101,000 - $ 121,000
for 2018.
On top of this, Congress is considering a few new laws that will impact the definition of
joint employers, and give
employers that operate in multiple states a safe harbor provision
for paid time - off.
It is clear that the EAT did not regard its conclusion as representing a satisfactory state of affairs, particularly where the
joint or concurrent tortfeasors are at arms» length, eg as in Bullimore v Porthecary Witham Weld [2011] IRLR 18 where an ex-
employer gave a damaging reference about the claimant to a prospective
employer because the ex-employee had presented a sex discrimination claim against them and the prospective
employer withdrew the offer
for the same reason, and in circumstances where CLIA 1978 applies to discrimination claims brought in the ordinary courts.
The changes included amendments to the mandatory minimum training requirements
for health and safety committee members and worker health and safety representatives; mandatory annual evaluations of
joint committee effectiveness; and a clarification of what it means
for employers and worker representatives to participate in
employer incident investigations.
For any work lasting 90 days or more, larger
employers (20 + workers) are required to have a
joint worksite health and safety committee and smaller
employers (5 - 19 workers) are required to have a health and safety representative.
Bill 177 also amended the OHSA to include a new specific duty
for employers to notify the Ministry of Labour if the
joint health and safety committee or representative, as applicable, has identified potential structural inadequacies of a building, structure, or any part thereof, or any other part of a workplace, whether temporary or permanent, as a source of danger or hazard to workers.
Joint health and safety committees will be required
for larger
employers (20 or more workers) and smaller
employers (5 - 19 workers) will be required to have a health and safety representative.
In a ground - breaking decision published on August 27, 2015 (BFI Newby Island Recyclery) the National Labour Relations Board revisited the test to be used in determining whether two
employers should be considered as a «
joint employer»
for the purposes of applying the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act.
Both contractors, as well as
employers, can apply
for this policy either individually or in
joint names.
Your
employer should provide you with a projected monthly payment amount
for a single - payment pension and a
joint - payment pension.
An aircrew life support resume serves a
joint purpose
for you as well as the
employer.
BountyJobs, Inc., provider of the leading recruiting technology platform
for collaboration between
employers and search firms with over $ 1.25 billion in placement fees to recruiters, today announced a
joint product release and partnership with top online recruitment platform, Workable.
The fact that transcripts of AAMA Continuing Education Units (CEUs) are readily available is a decided advantage
for CMAs (AAMA) and their supervisors and
employers, and should facilitate compliance with The
Joint Commission Standards
for Ambulatory Care.
Because hands - on, psychomotor competencies can not be measured conclusively by a paper - and - pencil or computer - based test, the mandatory education requirement — which must include a practicum of 160 hours or more — distinguishes the CMA (AAMA) from all other medical assisting credentials, and provides
employers, patients, malpractice insurance carriers, and third - party accrediting bodies such as The
Joint Commission and the National Committee
for Quality Assurance (NCQA) with tangible evidence that CMAs (AAMA) are not only knowledgeable about the multifaceted dimensions of the profession, but also competent in the clinical and administrative duties that are required in ambulatory care delivery settings.
Others prefer to retain the legal benefits of marriage — some
employer health plans cover legally separated spouses,
for example, and the IRS allows legally separated couples to file a
joint tax return.
This informal guidance changed the previous «direct» control standard to a more ambiguous «indirect» control standard, creating uncertainty
for franchisors when structuring franchise programs to avoid
joint -
employer liability.