Since the 1990s (by rule) and 2000 (by law) New Hampshire has provided
for a judicial performance evolution program (R.S.A. 490:32 and Supreme Court Rule 56) that produces annual reports on how the state's judges fare in areas such as Temperament, Legal Knowledge, and Attentiveness.
Not exact matches
(4) The independent panel shall report as approved
for each
judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible
for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their
performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved
for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).
The best form of accountability is adherence to the Code of
Judicial Conduct (an all - encompassing
performance code
for judges).
Recognizing that appellate
Judicial Performance Evaluation (JPE) programs have largely been patterned after programs for trial judges, IAALS is pleased to offer recommendations and tools for evaluating the performance of appellate judges that are tailored to those judges» unique role and respon
Performance Evaluation (JPE) programs have largely been patterned after programs
for trial judges, IAALS is pleased to offer recommendations and tools
for evaluating the
performance of appellate judges that are tailored to those judges» unique role and respon
performance of appellate judges that are tailored to those judges» unique role and responsibilities.
ROANOKE — Supreme Court Chief Justice Donald W. Lemons has named a 14 - member panel to recommend improvements
for the newly revived
Judicial Performance Evaluation program.
A variety of entrepreneurs and researchers are actively testing alternative uses of the blockchain to create a new category of «smart contracts» that allow
for contract
performance to be verified without requiring a
judicial system or other centralized third party.
Smart contracts based on the Bitcoin Blockchain could allow
for contract
performance to be verified without requiring a
judicial system or other centralized third party.
The management and allocation of housing stock by a housing trust which is a registered social landlord under the Housing Act 1996, including decisions concerning the termination of a tenancy, is a function of a public nature, with the effect that the registered social landlord is to regarded as a public authority
for the purposes of s 6 (3)(b) of the Human Rights Act 1998 and so is amenable to
judicial review on conventional public law grounds in respect of its
performance of that function.
Search
Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) recommendations
for New Mexico judges standing
for retention in 2016 (available September 28).
HB 3378: mandatory retirement
for appellate judges at age 75; judge may serve out term in which age 75 is reached HB 3379: term limits of 12 years
for the Court of Civil Appeals only; there is no mention of term limits
for the state's top courts (Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals) although news reports indicate that may be in the offing HB 3380: Creation of Board on
Judicial Performance Evaluation.
Boing Boing refers to a post on the Lowering the Bar blog that says that judge has been disciplined
for that by the state Commission on
Judicial Performance.
In 2004 - 2005, she served as reporter
for the American Bar Association's
Judicial Performance Evaluation Committee, which revised and updated the ABA Guidelines
for the Evaluation of
Judicial Performance.
Reddick is a nationally recognized expert in the areas of
judicial selection and
judicial performance evaluation and has conducted training programs
for members of
judicial nominating commissions around the country.
51.11 (1) The Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice may establish a program of
performance evaluation
for provincial judges, and may implement the program when it has been reviewed and approved by the
Judicial Council.
Caren teaches as an adjunct professor
for the University of Denver College of Law and serves on the
Judicial Performance Commission (evaluation of judges in the 20th District in Boulder, Colorado).
Caren is an adjunct professor
for the University of Denver College of Law, a
Judicial Performance Commissioner in Boulder, and a board member
for DirectWomen.
His
judicial experience included serving as a Supervising Judge of the family law panel for 3 years, Presiding Judge of the court's appellate division, and a special master for the Commission on Judicial Perf
judicial experience included serving as a Supervising Judge of the family law panel
for 3 years, Presiding Judge of the court's appellate division, and a special master
for the Commission on
Judicial Perf
Judicial Performance.
COMMENT [1] When seeking support or endorsement, or when communicating directly with an appointing or confirming authority, a candidate
for appointive
judicial office must not make any pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial
performance of the adjudicative duties of the office.
The function of absolute immunity in the
performance of
judicial duties is not to shield members of the judiciary from liability
for their own misconduct, but rather «to protect their offices from the deterrent effect of suit alleging improper motives where there has been no more than a mistake or a disagreement on the part of the complaining party with the decision made.»
Thinking About Judges and
Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users David Rottman and Tom Tyler, Onati Socio - Legal Series 4 (5)(2014) This article «describes and critiques existing judicial performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension for measuring quality through both survey and observational methods
Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users David Rottman and Tom Tyler, Onati Socio - Legal Series 4 (5)(2014) This article «describes and critiques existing judicial performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension for measuring quality through both survey and observational meth
Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users David Rottman and Tom Tyler, Onati Socio - Legal Series 4 (5)(2014) This article «describes and critiques existing
judicial performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension for measuring quality through both survey and observational methods
judicial performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension for measuring quality through both survey and observational meth
performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension
for measuring quality through both survey and observational methods.»
She is the recipient of numerous awards and honors, including the American College of Trial Lawyers» Justice Sandra Day O'Connor Award recognizing a judge
for exemplary
judicial independence in the performance of his or her duties, the George Washington University's Distinguished Alumni Award, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers» Jurist of the Year Award, the Florida Association of School Social Workers» Lifetime Achievement Award, the Palm Beach County League of Women Voters Good Government Award, the William M. Hoeveler Judicial Professionalism Award, the Visionary Award of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar, the Jewish Museum of Florida's Breaking the Glass Ceiling Award, the Florida Council on Crime and Delinquency Distinguished Judicial Service Award, the Florida Association of Women Lawyers» Award in recognition of lifelong dedication to the success of women lawyers in the legal profession, the American Bar Association's Law Day Speech Award, the Lifetime Achievement Award presented by the Palm Beach County Jewish Federation and the Palm Beach County Legal Aid Society Civil Litigation Pro Bon
judicial independence in the
performance of his or her duties, the George Washington University's Distinguished Alumni Award, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers» Jurist of the Year Award, the Florida Association of School Social Workers» Lifetime Achievement Award, the Palm Beach County League of Women Voters Good Government Award, the William M. Hoeveler
Judicial Professionalism Award, the Visionary Award of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar, the Jewish Museum of Florida's Breaking the Glass Ceiling Award, the Florida Council on Crime and Delinquency Distinguished Judicial Service Award, the Florida Association of Women Lawyers» Award in recognition of lifelong dedication to the success of women lawyers in the legal profession, the American Bar Association's Law Day Speech Award, the Lifetime Achievement Award presented by the Palm Beach County Jewish Federation and the Palm Beach County Legal Aid Society Civil Litigation Pro Bon
Judicial Professionalism Award, the Visionary Award of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar, the Jewish Museum of Florida's Breaking the Glass Ceiling Award, the Florida Council on Crime and Delinquency Distinguished
Judicial Service Award, the Florida Association of Women Lawyers» Award in recognition of lifelong dedication to the success of women lawyers in the legal profession, the American Bar Association's Law Day Speech Award, the Lifetime Achievement Award presented by the Palm Beach County Jewish Federation and the Palm Beach County Legal Aid Society Civil Litigation Pro Bon
Judicial Service Award, the Florida Association of Women Lawyers» Award in recognition of lifelong dedication to the success of women lawyers in the legal profession, the American Bar Association's Law Day Speech Award, the Lifetime Achievement Award presented by the Palm Beach County Jewish Federation and the Palm Beach County Legal Aid Society Civil Litigation Pro Bono Award.
The General Assembly shall prescribe a procedure, in addition to impeachment and address set forth in this Section,
for the removal of a Justice or Judge of the General Court of Justice
for mental or physical incapacity interfering with the
performance of his duties which is, or is likely to become, permanent, and
for the censure and removal of a Justice or Judge of the General Court of Justice
for wilful misconduct in office, wilful and persistent failure to perform his duties, habitual intemperance, conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the
judicial office into disrepute.
And finally, Peter Ortego of Lewis, who is an attorney, was reappointed to the Twenty - second
Judicial District
Judicial Performance Commission
for a term effective December 1, 2015, through November 30, 2019.
Attorney Christopher Michael Turner of Pueblo was also reappointed to the Tenth
Judicial District
Judicial Performance Commission
for a term effective December 1, 2015, through November 30, 2019.
Apple's legal battle against accusations that it intentionally slows down older iPhones to incentivize customers to upgrade to newer models will likely take place in one courtroom near the company's headquarters in California.The U.S.
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has disclosed that it will consider consolidating dozens of iPhone
performance - related complaints filed against Apple during a hearing scheduled
for Thursday, March 29 in Atlanta, Georgia, as is routine
for similar cases filed across multiple states.Apple currently faces 59 putative class actions across 16 district courts in the United States.
For judicial clerkship job you need good research skills, proficiency to use computers and good academic
performance.