«The Importance of Planetary Rotation Period
for Ocean Heat Transport» is published in the journal Astrobiology on Monday, July 21, 2014.
Not exact matches
Transport by these deep - reaching eddies provides a mechanism
for spreading the hydrothermal chemical and
heat flux into the deep -
ocean interior and
for dispersing propagules hundreds of kilometers between isolated and ephemeral communities.
Where the
heat is actually stored is another matter... the Southern
Ocean,
for instance, appear to be taking up far more
heat than is being stored there due to equatorward
transport.
Imagine a man or woman being so arrogant, and selfish, that they'd take a job driving a CO2 belching truck, or dig
for coal in a mine, or fish
for salmon in the
ocean, or fly a CO2 belching airliner, or flip beef patties that came from CH4 exhausting cows, or teaching a classroom of students all of whom belch CO2 and exhaust CH4 and whom will have offspring that produces even more of those evil gases, or working as a climate scientist in an office
heated by CO2 belching FFs and occasionally traveling around the world by CO2 belching airliner — all the while using computers made from FFs and powered by CO2 belching FF power plants, or working as a Senator from Tennessee who was President of the USA
for a few hours and who travels all over the world in CO2 belching airliners, or one of the millions of people who mine, process, manufacture and
transport every product you have ever seen in your life and all the ones you haven't seen as well.
Is it not possible that the polar barometric events act as significant pipelines
for the re-emission of the
ocean entrapped LW in the first three meters, by
transporting the oceanic
heat content energy
for stellar release?
3) Can you confirm that the temperature and net flux data
for GISS - E2 - R, available via the CMIP5 portals and KNMI Climate Explorer are based on a model corrected to fix the
ocean heat transport problem which you identified in the Russel
ocean model in your 2014 paper?
Theory and modelling suggest that if the sinking of the salty surface waters in the North Atlantic slowed down or stopped, there would be a reduction in the
heat transport by the
ocean, which would have implications
for the climate of northern Europe.
If tropical cyclone occurrence decreases, less of the
heat is dissipated, and unless
ocean circulation in some way compensates by
transporting the additional thermal energy elsewhere (i.e.
for example out of the «main development region» of the Atlantic) some day a storm will tap the enhanced energy source.
Where the
heat is actually stored is another matter... the Southern
Ocean,
for instance, appear to be taking up far more
heat than is being stored there due to equatorward
transport.
In principle, there can be two reasons
for a change in
ocean temperature:
heat exchange through the surface or
heat transports within the
ocean.
Thermal expansion would continue
for many centuries, due to the time required to
transport heat into the deep
ocean.
It is the primary mechanism whereby
heat and dissolved carbon in surface water is
transported down to the
ocean depths, where they may remain
for a thousand years or more.
Although more research is needed, there is some agreement among oceanographers that,
for the entire area north of 30 N latitude, the
ocean's poleward
transport of
heat is the equivalent of about 15 watts per square metre of the earth's surface (W / m2).
It's responsible
for transporting heat all over the
ocean and regulating weather patterns in places like Europe and eastern North America.
Reduction in ice free area, a positive feedback to the atmosphere increases poleward
ocean heat transport, a negative feedback
for the
oceans.
Moreover, changes in models often affect climate simulations in ways that are understandable in physical, real - world terms; increasing an
ocean - model's resolution,
for example, makes the simulated Gulf Stream stronger, and thus enhances
heat transport to the North Atlantic.
The reason
for the decline in sea surface temperatures at these locations is because of the reduced
heat transport along the
ocean surface from the tropics - where solar
heating is most intense.
This has nothing to do with
heat transport into the
ocean, although that phenomenon, in my view, also supports fairly high sensitivities once the evidence
for significant rates of deep
ocean transport are factored in (but that's a different topic).
Conversely, during low solar activity during the Little Ice Age,
transport of warm water was reduced by 10 % and Arctic sea ice increased.17 Although it is not a situation I would ever hope
for, if history repeats itself, then natural climate dynamics of the past suggest, the current drop in the sun's output will produce a similar cooler climate, and it will likely be detected first as a slow down in the poleward
transport of
ocean heat.22 Should we prepare
for this possibility?
This is wrong — the
ocean takes up a huge amount of
heat in the tropics and does indeed store it and
transport it (e.g. to the north in the Gulf Stream) where it contributes mightily to the moderation of the climate of Europe,
for example.
All of these characteristics (except
for the
ocean temperature) have been used in SAR and TAR IPCC (Houghton et al. 1996; 2001) reports
for model - data inter-comparison: we considered as tolerable the following intervals
for the annual means of the following climate characteristics which encompass corresponding empirical estimates: global SAT 13.1 — 14.1 °C (Jones et al. 1999); area of sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere 6 — 14 mil km2 and in the Southern Hemisphere 6 — 18 mil km2 (Cavalieri et al. 2003); total precipitation rate 2.45 — 3.05 mm / day (Legates 1995); maximum Atlantic northward
heat transport 0.5 — 1.5 PW (Ganachaud and Wunsch 2003); maximum of North Atlantic meridional overturning stream function 15 — 25 Sv (Talley et al. 2003), volume averaged
ocean temperature 3 — 5 °C (Levitus 1982).
The
oceans play an important role in the earth's climate; they
transport heat from equator to pole, provide moisture
for rain, and absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
While the circulation of the Atlantic
Ocean has a complex three - dimensional spatial structure, the zonally integrated flow in the basin, referred to as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), is largely responsible
for the net northward oceanic
heat transport on climate - relevant timescales.
A commentator on the ClimateAudit thread has asked Gavin Schmidt, in a comment submitted to RealClimate, whether temperature and net flux data
for GISS - E2 - R available via the CMIP5 portals and KNMI Climate Explorer are based on a model corrected to fix the
ocean heat transport problem.
Associated with the warming, there has been an enhanced atmospheric hydrological cycle in the Southern
Ocean that results in an increase of the Antarctic sea ice for the past three decades through the reduced upward ocean heat transport and increased snow
Ocean that results in an increase of the Antarctic sea ice
for the past three decades through the reduced upward
ocean heat transport and increased snow
ocean heat transport and increased snowfall.
Since latent
heat transport (and surface cooling of the
ocean) must increase in proportion to the rate of evaporation, perhaps Wentz et al have identified a reason why the models appear to overstate climate sensitivity: the actual latent cooling increases by about 4 watts per square meter more than the models predict
for each degree rise in surface temperature.
Perhaps the model results do open a door
for Arctic geoengineering approaches though,
for instance by influencing Arctic
Ocean salinity and
heat transport or through Arctic solar radiation management.
Northward
ocean heat transport achieved by the AMOC is responsible
for the relative warmth of the Northern Hemisphere, compared to the Southern Hemisphere, and is thought to play a role in setting the mean position of the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone north of the equator.
For example, Holland et al. (2006) related simulated rapid ice loss events to anomalous
ocean heat transport into the Arctic from the North Atlantic.
My impression is that you think that «self - propelling» climate «trends» (something nebulous to do with changes in
ocean heat transport occurring
for no known reason) are an alternative explanation
for modern warming.
The basic results of this climate model analysis are that: (1) it is increase in atmospheric CO2 (and the other minor non-condensing greenhouse gases) that control the greenhouse warming of the climate system; (2) water vapor and clouds are feedback effects that magnify the strength of the greenhouse effect due to the non-condensing greenhouse gases by about a factor of three; (3) the large
heat capacity of the
ocean and the rate of
heat transport into the
ocean sets the time scale
for the climate system to approach energy balance equilibrium.
There are also other natural «modes of variability» which may be affected by a climate change,
for instance if the
heat transport in the
oceans are to change (e.g. the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation AMOC).
Micropaleontological evidence
for increased meridional
heat transport in the North Atlantic
Ocean during the Pliocene
For the real earth, with a significant
heat capacity and significant atmospheric and
ocean transport, the one summary number that has meaning is the average of T ^ 4 over the surface of the earth... That is what is going to go into determination of the global surface radiative balance.
The zonal integral (east to west) of wind stress curl across an
ocean basin is proportional to the western boundary current
transport (i.e., the
transport responsible
for the dominant part of the poleward
heat flux by the
ocean).
3) Can you confirm that the temperature and net flux data
for GISS - E2 - R, available via the CMIP5 portals and KNMI Climate Explorer are based on a model corrected to fix the
ocean heat transport problem which you identified in the Russell
ocean model in your 2014 paper?
For instance, if over 50 % of actual downwards
heat transport takes place in the West Pacific / Southern Indian
Ocean (s), could differences in tropical cyclonic activity be driving the major differences in
heat flow?
It would also allow
for a lag where an increase in surface
heat rises and falls as the mechanism (whatever it may be)
for transport of
heat to the deeper
oceans takes place.
In HadSM3, a motionless 50 m slab
ocean is coupled to the atmospheric model and
ocean heat transport is diagnosed
for each member.
«Estimates of Meridional Atmosphere and
Ocean Heat Transports Kevin E. Trenberth and Julie M. Caron» suggest 1.27 ± 0.26 PW of heat is carried by THC north If you heat the north going surface layer which then sinks warmer and travels south at below 2000 metres warmer this must surely be a good hiding place for a fair bit of missing TSI ene
Heat Transports Kevin E. Trenberth and Julie M. Caron» suggest 1.27 ± 0.26 PW of
heat is carried by THC north If you heat the north going surface layer which then sinks warmer and travels south at below 2000 metres warmer this must surely be a good hiding place for a fair bit of missing TSI ene
heat is carried by THC north If you
heat the north going surface layer which then sinks warmer and travels south at below 2000 metres warmer this must surely be a good hiding place for a fair bit of missing TSI ene
heat the north going surface layer which then sinks warmer and travels south at below 2000 metres warmer this must surely be a good hiding place
for a fair bit of missing TSI energy!
Fasullo and Trenberth (2008b) went on to evaluate the temporal and spatial characteristics of meridional atmospheric energy
transports for ocean, land, and global domains, while Trenberth and Fasullo (2008) delved into the
ocean heat budget in considerable detail and provided an observationally based estimate of the mean and annual cycle of
ocean energy divergence and a comprehensive assessment of uncertainty.
For a comprehensive GCM I can count
oceans, land, atmosphere, ice, biological processes, organic and inorganic chemical processes, human - made sources and other effects, radiative energy
transport, conduction and convective
heat transfer, phase change, clouds and aerosols, as some of the important system components, phenomena, and processes.
Heat transported deeper into the
ocean would increase its long - term residency in the Earth's hydrosphere * and * decrease the temperature of the surface layers of the
ocean which would decrease the amount of energy available
for radiated back into space.
We find that the energy
transport associated with wind - driven
ocean gyres is closely coupled to the energy
transport of the midlatitude atmosphere so that,
for example, the
heat transport of both systems scales in approximately the same way with the meridional temperature gradient in midlatitudes.