Sentences with phrase «for science talk»

For Science Talk, the weekly podcast of Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky, thanks for clicking on us.

Steve: For Science Talk, the podcast of Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, the podcast of Scientific American magazine, I am Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, I'm Steve Mirsky, thanks for clicking on us.

For science talk, the podcast of Scientific American magazine, I am Steve Mirsky.

Check out numerous features at our brand new, redesigned SciAm.com Web site, including the community, theblog and the image gallery; and you can write to us at [email protected] For Science Talk, the weekly podcast of Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, the podcast of Scientific American.

For Science Talk, the weekly podcast of Scientific American, I am Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, the podcast of Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, the podcast of Scientific American, I am Steve Mirsky.

For Science Talk, the weekly podcast of Scientific American, I'm Steve Mirsky.

Not exact matches

The pre-eminent American science journalist, Gleick herein explores the history and effects of knowledge communication between humans, drawing a link from African talking drums and the earliest alphabets through the telegraph — once «a nervous system for the Earth» — to Wikipedia and Twitter, and the current state of information overload from which so many claim to suffer.

As a passionate advocate for accessible computer science, she spoke at this year's March for Science in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about Eyeascience, she spoke at this year's March for Science in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about EyeaScience in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about Eyeagnosis.

Dr. Zuckerberg talks about his son as having been «a good student» and having «a special affinity for math and sciences.»

«This is a chance for the Democrats to talk in tough terms about safety and security and also to link that to the gun issue,» said Robert Spitzer, political science professor at State University of New York at Cortland.

[1:20] How the kindness of a stranger changed Tony's life [3:35] Peter Diamandis talks about the origins of X Prize [6:30] Technology helping the agricultural industry [7:00] Sequencing genomes [8:55] Life - work integration [11:15] Finding your highest calling in life [12:00] Reframing what is «impossible» [14:00] Strategy vs. psychology [15:00] Changing your state [16:00] The science of achievement, the art of fulfillment [19:00] Living in a beautiful state [24:00] Thinking 10x bigger [28:00] Surrounding yourself with a «nothing is impossible» community [29:00] The news pollutes your mind [31:00] Tony's natural gifts and core beliefs [33:30] Overcoming failure and criticism [37:45] Defining your environment [40:00] Life happens for you, not to you [42:00] Rituals and practices to up your game [46:30] Tony's priming process

Rich = not just financial, it's emotional, spiritual, health, etc. [6:01] Two skills for true wealth, first is the «Science of Achievement» [6:34] After talking to top investors, Tony found that everyone invests differently, but there are some things that everyone has in common: The Core Four [6:46] Same as health, everyone is unique, but there are fundamentals that if you violate the rules you're going to not have energy, get sick [7:23] Three fundamentals for achievement [7:32] What is something in your life today that once was a dream?

Thune chairs the Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee, which is one of several that combined for today's hearing, but he did not indicate whether it would be that or another committee, or another group of them, that will talk to Cambridge Analytica and whichever other companies are deemed to be alike to it.

Cambridge Analytica, a data science company that worked for President Trump's campaign, announced Tuesday that it has suspended chief executive Alexander Nix after a British television station aired secretly recorded video that appeared to show him talking about entrapment as a way to win campaigns.

I don't know why more people don't talk about Google Scholar, but I love this tool for researching science - heavy articles and digging into emerging studies.

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

For that matter anyone who has faith in science (athiests I'm talking to you) should never be allowed in our country!

The internet is the best new thing, (for we atheists, who can now talk science and reason without fear of murder by the faithful) Those who are still clinging to faith and delusion NEED HELP.

For arguments sake let us talk about science, is every thing in this world explained by science?

His objective was to accomplish a philosophical foundation for the various sciences to be able to talk with one another.

«Well when was the last time you talked about why you are inclusive, why you embrace science, why you care for the poor, and why you avoid aligning yourself with one political party?»

Join Lawrence Principe, professor of the history of science and technology at Johns Hopkins University, for a talk exploring the foundations of this myth and how it rose to the realm of «common knowledge.»

I am not speaking to «attacking all views of God» I was actually talking about your assumed philosophy of science which you think doesn't provide enough evidence for God.

’28 Kuhn's portrayal of normal science as dominated by unchallenged dogmas, his failure to specify criteria for paradigm choice, and his talk of «conversion» and «persuasion» all seem to these critics to threaten the objectivity and rationality of the scientific enterprise.

But if you want to talk about why we're here, where we came from, it's... The word in science for faith is theory.

He spoke of the prestige of science in our culture and the corresponding lack of respect for religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking about their feelings»).

I find that science offers much better explanations for gravity, energy, emotions, evolution, the universe, and conscience, collaboration, photons, the evolution of eyes, and on and on it goes... I guess the point is... Prove that God exists, and we can talk.

Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourselTalk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourseltalk about God and Science and find it out for yourself...

I just thought you'd like to read the latest version of my talk for the American Political Science Association meeting to be held in Canada.

In the effort to give objectivity to theological talk and thus autonomy to theology, the only recourse for theologians, as long as they were bound by the static pattern of thinking and its logic of meaning, was to distinguish theology spatially from science.

We're talking about a state that wants to take evolution out of its science textbooks and Thomas Jefferson out of the history textbooks for being too much of a «radical.»

For what he wishes to do is not to discard the mythological material — mistaken science, talk about the divine in this - world idiom, highly fanciful material about descent and ascent of a supernatural divine being who pre-existed this world, etc., etc. — but to get at what it is really saying.

For the author states in one place that he once proposed to give a broadcast talk on «The Failures of Science.»

That is also the reason why Whitehead in Science and the Modern World talks about «substantial activity» and not just about «Substance»: Substance «is,» but «substantial activity» is for Whitehead nothing but «the underlying... activity of individuation» (Science 123).

In strict science, we can only write down the bare fact of concomitance; and all talk about either production or transmission, as the mode of taking place, is pure superadded hypothesis, and metaphysical hypothesis at that, for we can frame no more notion of the details on the one alternative than on the other.

Our upcoming main stage event in Los Angeles on October 28th features a talk on the evolution of the LA food scene by renowned restaurant critic, Jonathan Gold; a talk on building a kind coffee empire by Todd Carmichael, TV host and the founder and CEO of La Colombe; insights into how vegetables have become a trend by the woman whose company has been responsible for introducing kiwis and other fruits to the American market, Karen Caplan of Frieda's and other talks on the science of flavor, the convergence of sci - fi and food, leaving a popular band to become a chef, and much more.

Talks from Louise Fresco and Andrew Campbell describing their journey in science, food security, and R4D reassured me that the current uncertainty I am feeling is perfect normal and that I should strive to become the master of an area I have a great passion for.

Add to this the pressures of the cost - price squeeze to which Australian farmers have been subjected for decades, and it's not hard to picture the doom and gloom message promoted by science writer Julian Cribb, who was talking to his latest book, The Coming Famine: The Global Food Crisis and What We Can Do to Avoid It.

Wearing our skin - to - skin newborn carrier boosts oxytocin levels and lowers cortisol (science talk for more love and less stress), and increases prolactin, for better milk production and greater breastfeeding success.

The Hot Cross Buns were very easy to make and a great learning experience, you know how much we love easy science experiments, as we talked about how yeast works and why we had to wait for the dough to rise.

We love these maracas, as they are made from REAL eggs, yep REAL eggs, if you papier mache them, they become strong and won't break (you could talk about the science behind THAT for starters), but you could also fill them with different things and explore the different sounds.

MaryAnne from Mama Smiles is here today to talk about raising scientists — a topic close to my heart since I believe science literacy is important for everyone.

Teachers turn this time into an opportunity for additional instruction, tying in nutrition lessons with math, history, or science; there are opportunities to talk about good table manners as well.

Join the Science for Kids Community on Google + to share and talk about hands - on science ideas with Science for Kids Community on Google + to share and talk about hands - on science ideas with science ideas with others!

One of the comments I get the most when talking about sensory play, arts & crafts and science for kids, is «but my baby still puts everything in his / her mouth ``.