Sentences with phrase «for slaw»

I know of several sources for the Slaw article and comment feeds:

Nonetheless I was grateful today when, having not yet written my Monday post for Slaw, I saw this cartoon from the July 7, 2014 edition of the Globe and Mail — a twist on that famous «It's just a flesh wound!»

But there's also no reason for Slaw to hang back.

Javascript is not for everyone, I realize — though you'd be safe turning it on for Slaw.

A question for Slaw readers: Does this font addition create enough of an incentive to start using Google Docs if you aren't using it now?

(I sometimes think a good motto for Slaw might be «More than you need, more than you know.»)

If you have ideas for Slaw or if you would like to submit a post for consideration, please let us know.

And now they've got one for Slaw

It might be that the Minerva project was of limited duration, though the catalog page suggests it's ongoing — even for Slaw.

As readers of Slaw will know, we approached Maritime Law Book a little over a year ago with the idea of a collaboration in which MLB would select certain of its case summaries for Slaw to make freely available online.

And much of what gets retailed is old hat — certainly for Slaw readers.

It took years and thousands of incoming links for Slaw to break through and be found — for more than a bunch of coleslaw recipes, anyway.

And for Slaw's Law Librarian readers, you'll want to check out the latest addition by Tim Knight — The KF Modified Blog.

During this time Amanda (Andie) Bulman has become a fan of Slaw and I thought that as the summer is drawing to a close I thought I would give her a chance to craft a post for Slaw on what her experience has been like over the past several months.

And, if there are a significant number of us, what kind of interest there would be for a Slaw Blogger Meetup?

I took the opportunity to interview Tod Maffin over the phone last week to find out more for the Slaw audience:

It's been a good twelve months for Slaw.

For Slaw readers, who I suspect are not patent law afficionados, a sense of the impact of the decision can be gleaned from a good discussion in the Boston Globe and in Business Week.

For Slaw readers two items on his résumé stand out: he was one of the founders of Le Centre d'accès à l'information juridique (CAIJ) and was honoured with the Barreau's Merit Award for that — and he chaired the comité ad hoc sur les bibliothèques de droit au Québec du Barreau de Montréal.

I consider myself extremely fortunate to be able to write for Slaw, and even more fortunate to read it every day.

Given the current news stories arising out of the Commonwealth leaders meeting and the Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill introduced last month, I thought it might be useful for Slaw readers to have access to the actual language of the bill.

This has no direct relevance to law, of course, and so is off - topic for Slaw.

I will be providing a couple articles for SLAW on what I find.

Unless the licensing agreement with Thomson gives Carswell an exclusive in all media, I'd have thought that the way is open for Slaw to approach the Trustees [who would likely defer to the current editors] to see whether an electronic version [or at the very least, some PDFs] would be consistent with the objectives of the Trust.

Postscript: This is my final regular column for Slaw as a regular ethics columnist.

When not writing for Slaw and losing in debate with Simon Chester, I oversee Clicklaw Wikibooks, a wiki - based publishing platform for public legal information in British Columbia.

I personally think a photographic legal dictionary would be a wonderful project for Slaw.

Yep, it's a recipe for slaw.

Well, I've made a few changes recently, and started to use the RSS feed for Slaw Comments.

Updates to be posted shortly to our site but for Slaw readers, here you go:

He writes for Slaw, while managing the legal information platform Clicklaw Wikibooks, and helping the library develop CPD programs around new technology.

But for less critical purposes, it's up to the blog to decide if anonymity is immaterial (as it is in my view for Slaw) or such a cover for grotesqueries that it should not be allowed, or somewhere in between (e.g. a reason for moderation of the list, moderation in the commenters being absent...)

It seems that in Switzerland (and Switzerland is a veritable font of information for Slaw), Guinea Pigs (amongst others such as budgies and goldfish) have been identified as a «social species» that are protected by law.

I recently read Adam Dodek's post for Slaw entitled «Letter to A Future Lawyer» where he provides some great words of advice to those being called to the bar.

This is my first column for Slaw, and may I say, it is an honour to be asked to contribute.

These are still early days for Slaw — much has changed since CLIC, ABAnet and Counsel Connect, but the need for dialogue endures.

As an extra treat for Slaw, I made my case to Barbara Berger Eden (Director, Preservation and Collection Maintenance) and was allowed to take a few photos of the main workroom and some of the technology they use to treat books right.

This is a vibrant thread for SLAW.

The first technology column I wrote for Slaw was called Robot Law.

My latest column for Slaw «s series of intellectual property columns, on the laws governing comparative advertising in Canada, was published today.

Recently TOROG has updated two of the memos and has added a new one, providing a good opportunity for Slaw to remind readers of the existence of these very helpful documents.

He has agreed to provide us with a summary of his newsletter's content once a month — on the second Sunday of the month — and as well four times a year he will craft for Slaw a quarterly summary that draws together in condensed form the work of the Supreme Court over the prior three months.

Much fun though Bloomsday and the Joycean post was, Simon, you missed the deeper legal relevance for Slaw of the entire event.

One of our columnists, Patrick McKenna, is no longer able to write for Slaw.

(So there's still a chance for Slaw.)

We're proud to announce that four new lawyers have joined the roster of columnists, who write for Slaw in particular areas.

This is my first column for Slaw, and I have been trying to decide where to begin.

As usual, the speakers» list is a who's - who of experts in IT law and includes a number of lawyers who write or have written for Slaw, namely: Daniel Logan, James Kosa, Andrew Terrett, Richard Austin, John Gregory, and David Canton.

This is a good occasion to say thank - you to those of you who now write for Slaw and to the many who have contributed over the years.

But some interesting questions for Slaw to consider were raised by the second panel: what do we think?