For more on this topic by Jay Greene, please see the article he co-wrote with Stuart Buck, The Case
for Special Education Vouchers.
Students classified as learning disabled were excluded from the analysis, as they are eligible for a more generous voucher through the McKay Scholarship Program, and the FTC program should therefore have had no effect on schools» efforts to retain these students (see «The Case
for Special Education Vouchers,» features, Winter 2010).
Although few and far between, private placements nonetheless are an important constitutional precedent
for special education vouchers, as the latter constitute only an extension of a long - standing practice that dates back to the civil - rights revolution.
In general, the cost and incidence of private placements appear to have been exaggerated in the media (see «The Case
for Special Education Vouchers,» features, and «Debunking a Special Education Myth,» check the facts, Spring 2007).
Jay Greene and Stuart Buck («The Case
for Special Education Vouchers,» features, Winter 2010) are correct that some children with disabilities have unique needs that require private schooling.
Not exact matches
The Christian Right wants public money to be used
for private religious
education (
vouchers), buildings and services to be used
for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks,
special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.
A proposed $ 5 million
voucher program
for military families that have children with
special education needs is part of the defense - spending bill that Congress will take up in its post-election lame - duck session.
Special education voucher laws are very straightforward: The parents of any child found in need of a special education can ask the school district to pay for their child's education at a school the parent has identified as appro
Special education voucher laws are very straightforward: The parents of any child found in need of a
special education can ask the school district to pay for their child's education at a school the parent has identified as appro
special education can ask the school district to pay
for their child's
education at a school the parent has identified as appropriate.
However, Greene and Buck find that
vouchers are unlikely to increase the burden on districts:
Special education voucher laws typically stipulate that the
voucher amount should reflect the severity of the disability and that the cost to the district may not exceed the average cost the state pays
for the
education of children with similar conditions.
The opposite is true:
Special education vouchers discourage school districts from over-identifying disabled students, because any student identified as disabled might leave the district
for a private school, reducing district revenue received from the state.
In a feature article
for the winter 2010 issue of
Education Next, education researchers Jay P. Greene and Stuart Buck of the University of Arkansas, drawing on extensive previous research on the effects of special education vouchers, dispel several common myths about these programs and show how they have benefited handicapped children in states where they have been enacted, including those not in private pl
Education Next,
education researchers Jay P. Greene and Stuart Buck of the University of Arkansas, drawing on extensive previous research on the effects of special education vouchers, dispel several common myths about these programs and show how they have benefited handicapped children in states where they have been enacted, including those not in private pl
education researchers Jay P. Greene and Stuart Buck of the University of Arkansas, drawing on extensive previous research on the effects of
special education vouchers, dispel several common myths about these programs and show how they have benefited handicapped children in states where they have been enacted, including those not in private pl
education vouchers, dispel several common myths about these programs and show how they have benefited handicapped children in states where they have been enacted, including those not in private placements.
This program provides all students in
special education with a generous
voucher that they can use to attend a private school, eliminating the need
for dissatisfied parents to sue their school.
Greene and Buck note that in Florida, where the McKay Scholarship
for Students with Disabilities program has offered
vouchers to disabled students since 1999,
vouchers allow nearly 7 percent of
special education students to be educated in private schools at public expense, six times the national average
for private placement.
But
special education vouchers are not the best way to do this; they create other, adverse consequences, such as further segregating or perpetuating double standards
for children with disabilities and creating perverse incentives
for parents and educators.
Using children with disabilities to increase public support
for vouchers may be smart politics, but it doesn't mean that
special education vouchers are good policy.
Measures on knotty issues expected to be the heart of the Individuals with Disabilities Act revision — reducing paperwork related to the law, disciplining
special education students, «fully funding» the law, and offering a
voucher program
for students with disabilities — will...
Special education vouchers have a political advantage that
vouchers for low - income students lack: they can benefit not only the poverty - stricken disadvantaged, almost never a politically potent interest group, but also anyone who has a child with disabilities, a population that crosses all social and economic boundaries.
On Top of the News Stop Burning NY's
Special Ed Dollars New York Post 2/1/12 Behind the Headline The Case for Special EducationVouchers Education Next Winter 2010 Former State Assemblyman Michael Benjamin makes the case for special ed vouchers in New York City in an op - ed appearing in today'
Special Ed Dollars New York Post 2/1/12 Behind the Headline The Case
for Special EducationVouchers Education Next Winter 2010 Former State Assemblyman Michael Benjamin makes the case for special ed vouchers in New York City in an op - ed appearing in today'
Special EducationVouchers
Education Next Winter 2010 Former State Assemblyman Michael Benjamin makes the case
for special ed vouchers in New York City in an op - ed appearing in today'
special ed
vouchers in New York City in an op - ed appearing in today's Post.
Andrew Rotherham and Sara Mead expressed this concern in a paper
for the Progressive Policy Institute in 2003: «
Special education vouchers may actually exacerbate the over-identification problem by creating a new incentive
for parents to have children diagnosed with a disability in order to obtain a
voucher.»
Almost 15 percent of students in the United States are said to have a disability under the procedures established by IDEA, so in states with
special education vouchers, the potential
for program growth is considerable.
And
special education vouchers even improve the quality of services
for the disabled students who remain in public schools because those schools risk losing students to the
voucher program if they do not serve the students well.
As the opportunity
for private placement with a
special education voucher becomes better known to parents, and as private providers become aware of the possibility of a larger clientele, one can anticipate an inexorable growth in the size and popularity of these programs.
That same year 19,852 students eligible
for special education took advantage of the opportunity to use a
voucher to attend private schools, and 21,493 students received scholarships averaging $ 3,750 from a tax credit program that opened private schooling to students from low - income families.
For another example, listen to Amber Winkler, Mike Petrilli, and Rick Hess discuss our most recent study on
special education vouchers (it starts around minute 11:00).
The protestations, complaints, and handwringing that swiftly followed were to be expected — Matt Ladner weighed in (on Jay Greene's blog) within hours,
for example, terming Texas «nothing short of disgraceful» and urging that it try Florida - style
special - ed
vouchers — and the feds will inevitably look into whether Texas has violated the well - known Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), versions of which have been on the statute books since Gerald Ford (with misgivings) signed the first such measure in 1975.
Sara Mead of the New America Foundation submitted a letter to the editor in response to our article, «The Case
for Special Ed
Vouchers,» which appears in the Winter 2010 issue of
Education Next.
Governor Romney has made the expansion of school choice
for disadvantaged students central to his campaign, calling
for the expansion of the Washington, D.C.,
voucher program and
for allowing low - income and
special education students to use federal funds to enroll in private schools.
Among the pluses: Florida's excellent accountability system
for schools; a longitudinal database containing student data from pre-K through age 20; a strong charter - school law;
special -
education vouchers; and a tax - credit program
for corporate donations to private - school scholarship programs.
Paul E. Peterson's tales help to explain how nation building, progressive
education, the civil rights movement, unionization, legalization,
special education, bilingual teaching, accountability,
vouchers, charters, and homeschooling have, each in a different way, set the stage
for a new era in American
education.
Peterson's tales help to explain how nation building, progressive
education, the civil rights movement, unionization, legalization,
special education, bilingual teaching, accountability,
vouchers, charters, and homeschooling have, each in a different way, set the stage
for a new era in American
education.
In July 2014, Citizens
for Strong Schools, Inc. and Fund
Education Now amended a five - year - old lawsuit alleging the state has failed to adequately fund public education, to include new claims concerning the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program and the McKay voucher program for students with speci
Education Now amended a five - year - old lawsuit alleging the state has failed to adequately fund public
education, to include new claims concerning the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program and the McKay voucher program for students with speci
education, to include new claims concerning the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program and the McKay
voucher program
for students with
special needs.
Students requiring
special educational services are eligible
for additional
voucher funds equal to the federal
special education funding in their home districts.
We have not been able to surmount all of the obstacles to identifying the percentage of students in private schools who would have been identified as in need of
special education in public schools, but we believe we have fairly accurate information on this question
for the country's largest and longest - running school -
voucher program.
Indeed, in a certain sense,
special ed
vouchers have already existed nationwide
for some 35 years under the Individuals with Disabilities in
Education Act, which allows
special ed students to attend private school at public expense.
In an article
for Education Next, Stuart Buck and Jay Greene argue in favor of
special ed
vouchers that would give all parents of
special needs students the ability to enroll their children in private schools without having to convince public school officials of the need
for a private placement.
And, the final US Department of
Education report on the Washington, DC
voucher program showed that a main reason why students didn't use a
voucher offered to them was that they were unable to find a participating school with services
for their learning or physical disability or other
special needs.
The North Carolina legislature overrode Gov. Roy Cooper's veto to enact Senate Bill 257, a budget bill that includes additional funding
for the state's two school
voucher programs as well as a new
education savings account (ESA)
for children with
special needs.
One might expect
special education voucher programs — as exist in Florida, Ohio, and Wisconsin — to provide the best guarantees
for students with disabilities.
These reforms include charter schools,
education scholarship accounts,
special needs
vouchers, the Literacy Based Promotion Act of 2013, and a clear A-F grading system
for schools and school districts.
These schemes also include tax breaks
for private school participants, a statewide
voucher system,
special education vouchers, takeover policies that allow unelected czars to control public schools, and an expansion of private charters.
•
Special education vouchers will require districts to pay private religious schools $ 12,000 for students with special education needs; private schools do not have to follow federal requirements for special ed st
Special education vouchers will require districts to pay private religious schools $ 12,000
for students with
special education needs; private schools do not have to follow federal requirements for special ed st
special education needs; private schools do not have to follow federal requirements
for special ed st
special ed students.
NSBA opposes private school
vouchers and urges Congress to reject using any federal funds
for a national
voucher program, including any
special education vouchers for military children and / or specific subgroups of students.
Also, watch
for more
vouchers to charter schools that are schools
for only
special education.
Gretchen Cagle, director of
special education at MDE, says this is common
for applicants who try to use
vouchers at private schools that do not exclusively serve
special - needs students.
Only about half of the private schools participating in
voucher programs provided
special education or disability related information on their websites, creating a significant problem
for families making a decision about where to send their children.
These options include open enrollment, private school
vouchers for both regular and
special education, and independent charter schools.
I am also disappointed with the further expansions of private school
vouchers and
special needs
vouchers which continue to take us down the path of funding dual
education systems when we have not been able to maintain even inflationary increases
for our constitutionally mandated public school system.
The legislature adopted an Individual
Education Account
voucher program designed
for students with
special needs back in 2015.
The bill was also sharply criticized by disability rights groups, who say it would strip hard - won legal rights from families with
special - needs children, and by the state Department of Public Instruction, which faults the bill
for demanding no accountability from private schools
for actually providing the
special education services that would be the basis
for the
vouchers.
Complicating matters
for public school finance directors and
special education providers is a new
voucher program enacted by lawmakers last year that, beginning this fall, will funnel money out of public coffers into private educational settings.