Sentences with phrase «for user activated soft fork»

By April of 2017, this attitude led Litecoin creator Charlie Lee to advocate for a user activated soft fork on «his» coin.

Not exact matches

Tension is ratcheting up as the August 1 deadline for the BIP148 User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) approaches.
Either way, for some users the revelation added to the desire to have the Segregated Witness soft fork activated on the Bitcoin network.
Like all soft forks, a UASF would still be an opt - in proposition for regular users, assuming it activates smoothly.
Tension is ratcheting up as the August 1 deadline for the BIP148 User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) approaches.
As the debate escalates, supporters from both sides are now threatening to push for user activated forks (both soft and hard).
Bitcoin Core's original roadmap, the Segwit2x plan and users rallying around a change known as a «user - activated soft fork» (UASF), all call for the upgrade.
a user - activated soft fork (UASF) so that users could set a deadline for enforcing the new rules instead of having the miners activate the soft fork.
A Bitcoin developer, Shaolinfry, proposed a user - activated soft fork (UASF) so that users could set a deadline for enforcing the new rules instead of having the miners activate the soft fork.
Today is a momentous day for Bitcoin — the day that the UASF, User Activated Soft Fork, aActivated Soft Fork, activatedactivated.
GDAX is reffering to the August 1 deadline for the BIP148 User Activated Soft Fork (UASF), because of which tensions are high and prices of bitcoin and other cyrptocurrencies have already started declining rapidly in anticipation of a major market disruption.
Suggestions were put forward from a divided community for either a hard fork or a User Activated Soft Ffork or a User Activated Soft ForkFork.
Unfortunately, SegWit did not get the necessary support from miners which led the «User - Activated Soft Fork» or UASF, a fork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this sigFork» or UASF, a fork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this sigfork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this signal.
Antpool, one of the largest mining pools, signals for Bitcoin Unlimited however, the Bitmain CEO is firmly against a «User Activated Soft Fork» as it will split split the blockchain and create 2 or 3 kinds of Bitcoin if majority miners vote «no».
Even after the intense scaling debate throughout the summer and into the fall, nodes signaling for the user - activated - soft - fork (UASF), and Segwit2x (BTC1) continues to this day.
As tensions resulting from Bitcoin Unlimited's growing dominance started to boil over, two further proposals soon emerged that has today taken center stage in the scaling debate: a user - activated soft fork for the «mandatory activation of segwit deployment» as specified in BIP148, and SegWit2x.
As a User Activated Soft Fork (UASF), all users that run a BIP 148 node will then start rejecting any and all blocks that do not signal support for SegWit by the «deadline» — or, perhaps more accurately, «ultimatum» — set by BIP 148 users.
But in its later announcement, Bitmain emphasized that the user - activated hard fork (UAHF) was merely a contingency plan for user - activated soft fork (UASF).
Bitmain has published a blog post dubbed «UAHF: A contingency plan against UASF (BIP148)» in which the company takes a stance against the User - Activated Soft Fork, a proposal that aims for Bitcoin node users to activate Segregated Witness by force by rejecting any non-SegWit blocks.
Cointelegraph The call to raise a bounty for the development of a code that would enable a safe User Activated Soft Fork has raised -LSB-...]
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z