By April of 2017, this attitude led Litecoin creator Charlie Lee to advocate
for a user activated soft fork on «his» coin.
Not exact matches
Tension is ratcheting up as the August 1 deadline
for the BIP148
User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) approaches.
Either way,
for some
users the revelation added to the desire to have the Segregated Witness
soft fork activated on the Bitcoin network.
Like all
soft forks, a UASF would still be an opt - in proposition
for regular
users, assuming it
activates smoothly.
Tension is ratcheting up as the August 1 deadline
for the BIP148
User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) approaches.
As the debate escalates, supporters from both sides are now threatening to push
for user activated forks (both
soft and hard).
Bitcoin Core's original roadmap, the Segwit2x plan and
users rallying around a change known as a «
user -
activated soft fork» (UASF), all call
for the upgrade.
a
user -
activated soft fork (UASF) so that
users could set a deadline
for enforcing the new rules instead of having the miners
activate the
soft fork.
A Bitcoin developer, Shaolinfry, proposed a
user -
activated soft fork (UASF) so that
users could set a deadline
for enforcing the new rules instead of having the miners
activate the
soft fork.
Today is a momentous day
for Bitcoin — the day that the UASF,
User Activated Soft Fork, a
Activated Soft Fork,
activatedactivated.
GDAX is reffering to the August 1 deadline
for the BIP148
User Activated Soft Fork (UASF), because of which tensions are high and prices of bitcoin and other cyrptocurrencies have already started declining rapidly in anticipation of a major market disruption.
Suggestions were put forward from a divided community
for either a hard
fork or a User Activated Soft F
fork or a
User Activated Soft ForkFork.
Unfortunately, SegWit did not get the necessary support from miners which led the «
User -
Activated Soft Fork» or UASF, a fork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this sig
Fork» or UASF, a
fork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this sig
fork that aimed to compel miners into signaling approval
for SegWit, by rejecting blocks that did not contain this signal.
Antpool, one of the largest mining pools, signals
for Bitcoin Unlimited however, the Bitmain CEO is firmly against a «
User Activated Soft Fork» as it will split split the blockchain and create 2 or 3 kinds of Bitcoin if majority miners vote «no».
Even after the intense scaling debate throughout the summer and into the fall, nodes signaling
for the
user -
activated -
soft -
fork (UASF), and Segwit2x (BTC1) continues to this day.
As tensions resulting from Bitcoin Unlimited's growing dominance started to boil over, two further proposals soon emerged that has today taken center stage in the scaling debate: a
user -
activated soft fork for the «mandatory activation of segwit deployment» as specified in BIP148, and SegWit2x.
As a
User Activated Soft Fork (UASF), all
users that run a BIP 148 node will then start rejecting any and all blocks that do not signal support
for SegWit by the «deadline» — or, perhaps more accurately, «ultimatum» — set by BIP 148
users.
But in its later announcement, Bitmain emphasized that the
user -
activated hard
fork (UAHF) was merely a contingency plan
for user -
activated soft fork (UASF).
Bitmain has published a blog post dubbed «UAHF: A contingency plan against UASF (BIP148)» in which the company takes a stance against the
User -
Activated Soft Fork, a proposal that aims
for Bitcoin node
users to
activate Segregated Witness by force by rejecting any non-SegWit blocks.
Cointelegraph The call to raise a bounty
for the development of a code that would enable a safe
User Activated Soft Fork has raised -LSB-...]