Sentences with phrase «for young earth»

The museum presents the case for Young Earth creationism, following what it says is a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis, which says the Earth was created by God in six days less than 10,000 years ago.

@Believer Radioisotope evidence presents significant problems for the young earth position.

You claim evidence for a young earth but present none and then claim science rejects evolution which is like claiming water isn't wet.

And it is ironic that Mohler, who has been a tireless advocate for young earth creationism on the basis that «the straightforward and direct reading of [Genesis] describes seven 24 - hour days,» does not seem to think that a straightforward and direct reading of Jesus» teachings regarding violence is necessary.

Topher, again I challenge you to produce a reference to a scholarly article published in a reputable, peer - reviewed scientific journal that successfully makes the case for a young earth.

Once the cheerleader for young earth creationism, I grew fascinated with the science behind evolutionary theory.

Topher Where do you find biblical evidence for a young earth other than the 3 genealogies?

Are there non believers in your stack of proof for a young earth?

«Where do you find biblical evidence for a young earth other than the 3 genealogies?

Like those who argue for a young earth, many flat earthers used scriptural interpretation to bolster their belief.

For young earth creationism to be true it requires all of that phenomena to have changed its rate of formation at the same exact time, for no explainable reason at all.

@Topher It seems that before Ken Ham started his own project over there at AIG, he worked for the Insti / tute for Creation Research, which basically does the same thing as the Discovery Insti / tute — namely, try to create a «sciencey» veneer for Young Earth Creationism.

Not exact matches

To prepare for our future in low - Earth orbit, cislunar space, on the Moon, and on Mars, we need to foster a diverse pool of qualified, enthusiastic young people who are inspired to further the off - Earth dream.

There are many different ways of dating the earth, and many of them point to an earth much too young for evolution to have had a chance.

An Australian geologist who got his credentials dating rocks billions of years old, still selling his services as a qualified geologist, but also employed as as a «Creationist Assistant Professor of Geology» by the Institute for Creation Research in the USA, where he supports a young earth.

(for those who aren't aware, L4H is a young earth creationist)

I would like the name of one scientist that believes in a young earth and does so for non-religious reasons.

In fact, it's been demonstrated that population numbers are well within the limits for the Biblical view of a young earth.

And the Grand Canyon only lends itself to evidence for the flood and a young earth.

Heck young earth theorist have «geologist» that say that their is evidence for a world wide flood.

Sad when people want lies like a «young earth» and that «evolution is a myth» or that «some god caused» the big bang taught to their children in their schools, paid for by their tax dollars.

I'm as keen as anyone for a discussion about old earth / young earth (i'm a young earther for the record — at least I think I am But rather than all this constant intellectual bollix, let's sort out some of these basic issues first.

First of all, for even the young earth people (of which I am one) do not hold to the six thousand year view.

Responding to a piece I wrote for the Washington Post about my journey from young earth creationism to evolutionary creationism, Mohler told readers that my «glib and superficial endorsement of evolution and its reconciliation with Christianity is all too common and all to irresponsible.»

One only need search for «young earth geology» on youtube to get a plethora of videos from a Dr Snelling who was referenced a few times by Ham in the recent Ham - Nye debate.

I.e., Andrew Snelling who obtained credentials for his expertise as a geologist in dating things, but who simultaneously worked for one of the big «young - earth» groups.

Look into «radiohalos» for one, or «the speed of light changing» to see just two examples of evidence of a young earth.

The stories you hear and the things you hear in this documentary will break your heart for these poor young girls who are caught into the darkest and most evil web on earth.

E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.

My problem is the lies that «there are no true scientists» who hold to a young earth, that there's no evidence for it and that there's nothing published on the subject.

How can the moribund old man reason back to himself the romance, the mystery, the imminence of great things with which our old earth tingled for him in the days when he was young and well?

Mormons believe that we were once spirits in heaven that must come to the earth for a period of testing, though not remembering it, according to Rex E. Lee (1935 - 1996), tenth president of Brigham Young University.

In the Bible, before Jesus even came to Earth, Father God did not consider a young person to be accountable for such sins until they were 20 year old.

Alyosha, in the «conversion» scene after the death of Zossima, kisses the earth in an act that Dostoevsky intends to have decisive meaning for the youngest brother.

@ Jake: for further clarification: i am not a young earth creationist.

One only need search for «young earth geology» on youtube to get a plethora of videos from a Dr Snelling who was referenced a few times by Ham in the Ham - Nye debate.

(Bantam, 1968) have been sold, and its author, the young Swiss Erich von Däniken, is campaigning aggressively for converts to «his thesis that our earth was visited by interstellar travelers between 40,000 and 500 BC.

According to this chart, the Christian worldview includes belief in young earth creationism, support for the death penalty, a commitment to mind / body dualism, rejection of non-traditional family structure, and devotion to fee enterprise and capitalism.

First, our brother Michael Gungor, one of the most thoughtful musical artists of our time, has been publicly vilified across Christian media — both traditional, online, and social — for openly discussing his belief in an old earth rather than a young earth.

«Who covers the heaven with clouds, provides rain for the earth, makes the grass grow on the hills, gives food for the cattle, to the young ravens when they cry to Him.»

I'm * not * exactly «conservative» (I don't believe a «young earth» is Biblical and I'm for gun control), but some of the more conservative brethren have points too.

If he's pandering to the base of creationists and young - earth zealots then he is without honor or scruples and is (unfortunately) highly qualified for political office by today's standards.

The Blessed Sacrament, the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ on earth, must be at the heart of any spiritual event for young Catholics, through the Mass, Exposition and His reservation in the tabernacle.

Young earth creationists and «the new atheists» (Dawkins, Hitchens, etc.) actually have more in common than one might think, for both groups have arrived at the conclusion that accepting an old earth and evolutionary theory inevitably rules out the existence of God.

They grow up believing in an Eternal Hell of fire and brimstone, talking snakes, the Doctrine of Original Sin, animals in an ark, a Young Earth paradigm, the notion that people lived to be hundreds of years old a few thousand years ago, patriarchs that practiced child sacrifice and committed genocides, books that are supposed words of gawd that contradict real world observations, deities that kill their own children (human manifestations of their own selves) for the sake of sins that they never committed, the symbolic cannibalism and vampirism of a deity... I could go on for days.

For many of us, fighting the good fight of faith meant proving to skeptics that young earth creationism was scientifically sound, that the Battle of Jericho was an historical fact, and that believing in God was a perfectly rational and reasonable thing to do.

AiG is the popular young - Earth creationist apologetics organization led by Ken Ham, well - known for the 2014 Bill Nye - Ken Ham debate.

«During all this time I was never joined in profession of religion with any, but gave up myself to the Lord, having forsaken all evil company, taking leave of father and mother, and all other relations, and traveled up and down as a stranger on the earth, which way the Lord inclined my heart; taking a chamber to myself in the town where I came, and tarrying sometimes more, sometimes less in a place: for I durst not stay long in a place, being afraid both of professor and profane, lest, being a tender young man, I should be hurt by conversing much with either.

As a young evangelical myself, I confess I have grown tired... no, weary... of responding to comments like these with some honest suggestions for how my fellow evangelicals might avoid said retirement, only to be discounted and disparaged for believing the earth is more than 6,000 years old, for voting for Democrats from time to time, and for daring to serve communion to gays and lesbians.

My parents never really pushed young earth creationism on me nor taught that it was a fundamental element of the Christian faith, but for most of my life I travelled in circles where it was assumed that good Christians embraced a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, which describes the earth as being created in six days.