Sentences with phrase «for a claimant against»

Acted for a claimant against a defendant who created sham documents in order to avoid a guarantee and indemnity
Examples of his recent case - load are: led by Ed Pepperall QC in a large - scale action arising from a defective share sale; defended solicitors from allegations arising from property transactions, including alleged breaches of the Etridge guidance; acting for a claimant against solicitors who negligently handled his litigation; defending an IFA from allegations of inappropriately risky investment advice; acting for solicitors claiming contributions from another firm in respect of their own liability for breach of trust; advising clients on a claim against surveyors for losses arising from negligent property valuations.
Acting for claimants against property professionals in connection with the purchase and development of property.
Lydia acted for the Claimant against solicitors in respect of the misappropriation of monies held in escrow and the collapse of a Middle Eastern power project ($ 40million).
Acting for a claimant against solicitors who failed to transfer a lease upon change of the claimant from a company to a trust.
Acting for claimants against solicitors who negligently drafted a share sale agreement.
Acting for the claimants against a software developer in respect of a failed video game app development process.

Not exact matches

A judge dismissed one civil suit against him, ruling that Zhang was not responsible for the claimant's losses from the scheme.
634, 647 - 48, 219 S.W. 2d 910, 915 (1949)(«So long as there is a divided custody there will probably be bickerings and disputes and a natural tendency on the part of the child to play one against the other, as well as for the claimants to seek by indulgences to curry favor with the child, if not to prejudice it against the other.»)
Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued) for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and / or insist that Presidential electoral votes only be counted for candidates who are «natural born citizens» under Article II of the United States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action for deprivation of claimants» constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case) against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore, for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United States as a Constitutional Republic.
In addition, the Assembly removes penalty and interest charges as well as the ability to file with a county clerk judgments against a claimant for monies received because of false statement or representations.
Iain Duncan Smith's «workfare» programme was branded illegal in October, when he lost an appeal against a court judgement which said the department had failed to give welfare claimants sufficient information about what would happen if they refused to take part in free work for high street companies.
However, the counsel to the claimant F.A Ademu had filed a motion for default judgement against the defendant having failed to file their statement of defense within 30 days as provided in the state high court (civil procedure) rule 2006.
Additionally the self - employed face the disregard of trading losses under the DWP basis of accounting, so that if a claimant's expenses exceed his receipts in any month, he can not set the difference against a profit for the next or any subsequent month.
Ravi Naik at ITN Solicitors is gathering claimants to see if the latest revelations warrant action against Facebook for potential misuse of data.
The amount of compensation you receive in a claim, or that the claimant receives from your insurance company when filing a liability claim against you, depends on the limits set for your policy.
Send enough copies of the form by recorded delivery back to the court so that one can be sent to the «claimant» (the person who has the judgment against you) and one for the court.
For example, in Marshall [1986], EU: C: 1986:84 Case 152/84 a claimant successfully invoked the provisions of the Equal Treatment Directive 76/207 against a public - sector hospital.
However, there are also very many claimants who properly bring claims in order to obtain compensation for an actionable wrong committed against them.
A personal injury law firm has won its case against an insurer which settled claims with clients behind its back, in a major victory for claimant lawyers.
Assisted in successfully bringing IPEC proceedings (settled in favour of the claimant) against a UK infringer on behalf of US lawyers acting for the US owner of a world famous trade mark relating to beauty pageants.
The claimants (of which there were around 42,500) commenced proceedings against both SPDC and RDS but, for our purposes, it is the claim against RDS which is of interest.
F.S. 768.72 allows personal injury claimants in Florida to seek punitive damages against defendants for especially egregious wrongs.
Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the main allegations against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.
Alison Leith heads the department, which primarily acts for claimants in disputes against solicitors, architects, accountants, surveyors and insurance brokers.
A lower award was made to a 19 year old claimant Laura Tennant who pursued an action against Direct Line Insurance in Kilmarnock Sheriff Court (SLT 16/7/10 page 71) the sheriff awarded # 2000 for pain and suffering for an injury to neck with pain radiating to the arms, back and shoulders and a full recovery after 13 months.
In Howard, there was no evidence whatsoever that the claimant would have released his claims against the Bishop in return for American National's limit.
Therefore we applied on behalf of our client for a non-party costs order against the director of the Claimant company, Mr Windsor.
Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the principal allegations against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.
His recent cases include defending the former President and majority shareholder of VAB Bank against charges of contempt of court (sole counsel); acting for Mercuria Energy Trading in its successful defence of a US$ 270 million claim by Citibank in one of the biggest High Court banking trials of 2014, acting for the Claimant in an on - going US$ 830 million fraud claim in the Commercial Court (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & ors v.
It is clear that the EAT did not regard its conclusion as representing a satisfactory state of affairs, particularly where the joint or concurrent tortfeasors are at arms» length, eg as in Bullimore v Porthecary Witham Weld [2011] IRLR 18 where an ex-employer gave a damaging reference about the claimant to a prospective employer because the ex-employee had presented a sex discrimination claim against them and the prospective employer withdrew the offer for the same reason, and in circumstances where CLIA 1978 applies to discrimination claims brought in the ordinary courts.
One can imagine a situation where the employer has dissolved, the claimant succeeds in obtaining a substantial discrimination award, and the only person to enforce against is an admittedly discriminating manager, who, despite not being the employer, would find themselves liable for the full award.
The claimant claimed damages against the defendant on the grounds that but for the brain damage caused in the accident and the resulting personality change, he would not have committed the rapes.
Specialist claimant firm Leigh Day & Co has billed # 105m in fees for its work on the class action brought against oil company Trafigura, in one of the highest - ever costs claims for a single litigation case.
The claimant solicitors received civil legal aid funding while acting for clients in appeals against homelessness decisions under s 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996)(s 204 appeals).
Telekom Malaysia as claimant in a UNCITRAL arbitration against the Government of Ghana for improper regulatory interference with and expropriation of Telekom's investments in Ghana, and related domestic Ghanaian court proceedings.
Campaign Against Arms Trade v. Secretary of State for Trade: Junior Counsel for the Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Parallel proceedings against Cayman Island domiciled funds and an application for security for costs against the claimants.
Campaign Against Arms Trade v. Secretary of State for Trade (High Court): Junior Counsel for the Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Corbiere Limited v Mean Trading Systems: Acted for defendants in a claim brought against a start - up algorithmic trading hedge fund alleging misuse of confidential information in the software of the claimants.
The claimant was also trying to settle a claim against the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia as her insurer for no - fault, or «Part 7» benefits, for certain expenses arising from her accident injuries.
Hugh Mercer QC and Andrew Legg, instructed by Tim Russ of Clarke Willmott, were counsel for the Claimant on this application against the European Commission.
In both situations, if the effect of the Will or the laws of intestacy is not to make reasonable financial provision for a potential claimant, then a claim can be made against the estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Such a case may start from Ukraine in terms of negotiations, then proceed judicially in Greece, security measures (ship arrest) may be taken in Romania; when it comes to enforcement of the judgement, and a Russian insurer is involved refusing to pay under LOI issued for release of the ship in Romania, you have to initiate enforcement proceedings in Russia, whereas the said vessel may have been arrested by the claimants for the second time in Bangladesh, on the same claim against the new ship owner, where the court decides that it will hear the case against the latter on the merits.
• Acting for the Claimant in Gulf Center for Human Rights v the Prime Minister [2016] EWHC 1323 (Admin) a challenge against changes to the Ministerial Code (led by Jason Coppell QC and Hannah Slarks), and;
• Acting for the successful Claimant in R (on the application of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 1502 (Admin), a challenge to guidance from the defendant Secretary of State which sought to prohibit the administering authorities of the local government pension schemes from adopting policies of boycott, divestment and sanction against foreign nations (led by Nigel Giffin QC).
Brightside Group Ltd v RSM UK Audit LLP [2017] 1 WLR 1943 Acting for Claimant in professional negligence claim against auditors.
What appeared to be a «bad day at the office» for the SFO was compounded by the fact that the Court had declined to make an Order for costs against the Claimant.
«Prohibitions against the unauthorized practice of law are for the protection of the public, and are even more important in the context of the Settlement Agreement, where claimants are recovering from traumatic experiences and are more likely to be in a vulnerable position as a result.»
# 610 odd for the cost of a hire car for the claimant after his road traffic accident and the damages claim for it that was brought against the tortfeasor.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z