Acted
for a claimant against a defendant who created sham documents in order to avoid a guarantee and indemnity
Examples of his recent case - load are: led by Ed Pepperall QC in a large - scale action arising from a defective share sale; defended solicitors from allegations arising from property transactions, including alleged breaches of the Etridge guidance; acting
for a claimant against solicitors who negligently handled his litigation; defending an IFA from allegations of inappropriately risky investment advice; acting for solicitors claiming contributions from another firm in respect of their own liability for breach of trust; advising clients on a claim against surveyors for losses arising from negligent property valuations.
Acting
for claimants against property professionals in connection with the purchase and development of property.
Lydia acted
for the Claimant against solicitors in respect of the misappropriation of monies held in escrow and the collapse of a Middle Eastern power project ($ 40million).
Acting
for a claimant against solicitors who failed to transfer a lease upon change of the claimant from a company to a trust.
Acting
for claimants against solicitors who negligently drafted a share sale agreement.
Acting
for the claimants against a software developer in respect of a failed video game app development process.
Not exact matches
A judge dismissed one civil suit
against him, ruling that Zhang was not responsible
for the
claimant's losses from the scheme.
634, 647 - 48, 219 S.W. 2d 910, 915 (1949)(«So long as there is a divided custody there will probably be bickerings and disputes and a natural tendency on the part of the child to play one
against the other, as well as
for the
claimants to seek by indulgences to curry favor with the child, if not to prejudice it
against the other.»)
Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued)
for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and / or insist that Presidential electoral votes only be counted
for candidates who are «natural born citizens» under Article II of the United States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action
for deprivation of
claimants» constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case)
against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore,
for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United States as a Constitutional Republic.
In addition, the Assembly removes penalty and interest charges as well as the ability to file with a county clerk judgments
against a
claimant for monies received because of false statement or representations.
Iain Duncan Smith's «workfare» programme was branded illegal in October, when he lost an appeal
against a court judgement which said the department had failed to give welfare
claimants sufficient information about what would happen if they refused to take part in free work
for high street companies.
However, the counsel to the
claimant F.A Ademu had filed a motion
for default judgement
against the defendant having failed to file their statement of defense within 30 days as provided in the state high court (civil procedure) rule 2006.
Additionally the self - employed face the disregard of trading losses under the DWP basis of accounting, so that if a
claimant's expenses exceed his receipts in any month, he can not set the difference
against a profit
for the next or any subsequent month.
Ravi Naik at ITN Solicitors is gathering
claimants to see if the latest revelations warrant action
against Facebook
for potential misuse of data.
The amount of compensation you receive in a claim, or that the
claimant receives from your insurance company when filing a liability claim
against you, depends on the limits set
for your policy.
Send enough copies of the form by recorded delivery back to the court so that one can be sent to the «
claimant» (the person who has the judgment
against you) and one
for the court.
For example, in Marshall [1986], EU: C: 1986:84 Case 152/84 a
claimant successfully invoked the provisions of the Equal Treatment Directive 76/207
against a public - sector hospital.
However, there are also very many
claimants who properly bring claims in order to obtain compensation
for an actionable wrong committed
against them.
A personal injury law firm has won its case
against an insurer which settled claims with clients behind its back, in a major victory
for claimant lawyers.
Assisted in successfully bringing IPEC proceedings (settled in favour of the
claimant)
against a UK infringer on behalf of US lawyers acting
for the US owner of a world famous trade mark relating to beauty pageants.
The
claimants (of which there were around 42,500) commenced proceedings
against both SPDC and RDS but,
for our purposes, it is the claim
against RDS which is of interest.
F.S. 768.72 allows personal injury
claimants in Florida to seek punitive damages
against defendants
for especially egregious wrongs.
Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the main allegations
against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the
claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability
for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.
Alison Leith heads the department, which primarily acts
for claimants in disputes
against solicitors, architects, accountants, surveyors and insurance brokers.
A lower award was made to a 19 year old
claimant Laura Tennant who pursued an action
against Direct Line Insurance in Kilmarnock Sheriff Court (SLT 16/7/10 page 71) the sheriff awarded # 2000
for pain and suffering
for an injury to neck with pain radiating to the arms, back and shoulders and a full recovery after 13 months.
In Howard, there was no evidence whatsoever that the
claimant would have released his claims
against the Bishop in return
for American National's limit.
Therefore we applied on behalf of our client
for a non-party costs order
against the director of the
Claimant company, Mr Windsor.
Representation of Mr Maksimov at interlocutory hearings and, as sole counsel, at a 4 - day Commercial Court contempt trial in October 2014 at which the principal allegations
against Mr Maksimov were dismissed and the
claimant was ordered to pay 80 % of his costs (PJSC VAB v. Sergei Maksimov [2014] EWHC 3771 (Comm)(liability
for contempt); [2014] EWHC 4370 (Comm)(costs)-RRB-.
His recent cases include defending the former President and majority shareholder of VAB Bank
against charges of contempt of court (sole counsel); acting
for Mercuria Energy Trading in its successful defence of a US$ 270 million claim by Citibank in one of the biggest High Court banking trials of 2014, acting
for the
Claimant in an on - going US$ 830 million fraud claim in the Commercial Court (Russian banking sector), a US$ 800 million joint venture dispute in the BVI and acting as junior counsel to the Claimants in Hulley & ors v.
It is clear that the EAT did not regard its conclusion as representing a satisfactory state of affairs, particularly where the joint or concurrent tortfeasors are at arms» length, eg as in Bullimore v Porthecary Witham Weld [2011] IRLR 18 where an ex-employer gave a damaging reference about the
claimant to a prospective employer because the ex-employee had presented a sex discrimination claim
against them and the prospective employer withdrew the offer
for the same reason, and in circumstances where CLIA 1978 applies to discrimination claims brought in the ordinary courts.
One can imagine a situation where the employer has dissolved, the
claimant succeeds in obtaining a substantial discrimination award, and the only person to enforce
against is an admittedly discriminating manager, who, despite not being the employer, would find themselves liable
for the full award.
The
claimant claimed damages
against the defendant on the grounds that but
for the brain damage caused in the accident and the resulting personality change, he would not have committed the rapes.
Specialist
claimant firm Leigh Day & Co has billed # 105m in fees
for its work on the class action brought
against oil company Trafigura, in one of the highest - ever costs claims
for a single litigation case.
The
claimant solicitors received civil legal aid funding while acting
for clients in appeals
against homelessness decisions under s 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996)(s 204 appeals).
Telekom Malaysia as
claimant in a UNCITRAL arbitration
against the Government of Ghana
for improper regulatory interference with and expropriation of Telekom's investments in Ghana, and related domestic Ghanaian court proceedings.
Campaign
Against Arms Trade v. Secretary of State
for Trade: Junior Counsel
for the
Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment
for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Parallel proceedings
against Cayman Island domiciled funds and an application
for security
for costs
against the
claimants.
Campaign
Against Arms Trade v. Secretary of State
for Trade (High Court): Junior Counsel
for the
Claimant in landmark challenge to the legality of continued licensing of arms and military equipment
for export to Saudi Arabia on grounds that weapons may be used in serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Corbiere Limited v Mean Trading Systems: Acted
for defendants in a claim brought
against a start - up algorithmic trading hedge fund alleging misuse of confidential information in the software of the
claimants.
The
claimant was also trying to settle a claim
against the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia as her insurer
for no - fault, or «Part 7» benefits,
for certain expenses arising from her accident injuries.
Hugh Mercer QC and Andrew Legg, instructed by Tim Russ of Clarke Willmott, were counsel
for the
Claimant on this application
against the European Commission.
In both situations, if the effect of the Will or the laws of intestacy is not to make reasonable financial provision
for a potential
claimant, then a claim can be made
against the estate under the Inheritance (Provision
for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Such a case may start from Ukraine in terms of negotiations, then proceed judicially in Greece, security measures (ship arrest) may be taken in Romania; when it comes to enforcement of the judgement, and a Russian insurer is involved refusing to pay under LOI issued
for release of the ship in Romania, you have to initiate enforcement proceedings in Russia, whereas the said vessel may have been arrested by the
claimants for the second time in Bangladesh, on the same claim
against the new ship owner, where the court decides that it will hear the case
against the latter on the merits.
• Acting
for the
Claimant in Gulf Center
for Human Rights v the Prime Minister [2016] EWHC 1323 (Admin) a challenge
against changes to the Ministerial Code (led by Jason Coppell QC and Hannah Slarks), and;
• Acting
for the successful
Claimant in R (on the application of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign) v Secretary of State
for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 1502 (Admin), a challenge to guidance from the defendant Secretary of State which sought to prohibit the administering authorities of the local government pension schemes from adopting policies of boycott, divestment and sanction
against foreign nations (led by Nigel Giffin QC).
Brightside Group Ltd v RSM UK Audit LLP [2017] 1 WLR 1943 Acting
for Claimant in professional negligence claim
against auditors.
What appeared to be a «bad day at the office»
for the SFO was compounded by the fact that the Court had declined to make an Order
for costs
against the
Claimant.
«Prohibitions
against the unauthorized practice of law are
for the protection of the public, and are even more important in the context of the Settlement Agreement, where
claimants are recovering from traumatic experiences and are more likely to be in a vulnerable position as a result.»
# 610 odd
for the cost of a hire car
for the
claimant after his road traffic accident and the damages claim
for it that was brought
against the tortfeasor.