There are a few theories that are being tossed around in terms of explanations
for abiogenesis and cosmology.
There is zero supporting evidence
for the abiogenesis myth («life from non-life» foundation of atheism), but mountains of evidence for Jewish (Biblical) history, including written records by multiple authors, confirmed people, places, events, timelines, fulfilled prophesies, Israel scattered, Israel restored etc..
It is those elements we find on earth that likely allowed the trigger
for abiogenesis and evolution.
As opposed to ID / creationism, there is mechanistic evidence supporting plausible routes
for abiogenesis.
Not exact matches
You don't even have the slightest clue as to how
abiogenesis works or what the mechanics are
for evolution.
Science does not have an answer
for origin yet, but
abiogenesis is the path their on at the moment.
He cites it, along with local
abiogenesis as two possible theories
for the original development of life on Earth.
Suffice it to say there are many interesting hypotheses and the work continues (search PubMed
for «
abiogenesis» to read some of the actual peer - reviewed work).
Critics of
abiogenesis say that simply isn't enough time
for inorganic matter to become the theorized precellular life.
The theory most scientists currently favor
for the origins of life is called «
abiogenesis,» the gradual emergence of life on Earth from non-living matter.
It's called «
abiogenesis,» and it's an extremely fascinating field with a number of really smart scientists looking
for possible answers.
There are many promising hypotheses addressing
abiogenesis, but even without a fully vetted theory, the evidence
for evolution stands on its own.