Some climate scientists see compelling arguments
for accumulating heat and added water vapor fueling the kinds of turbulent storms that spawn tornadoes.
Not exact matches
- Reduce the
heat to medium - low, and allow the stew to simmer gently
for about 10 minutes, uncovered, just to «tighten» it up a bit, and to allow the flavors to marry; after 10 minutes, turn off the
heat, and add the seared sirloin back in, along with any
accumulated juices, and stir to combine; check to see if you need any additional salt / pepper.
At Global Healing Center, bottles exit the
heat tunnel and
accumulate on the rotary turntable
for cartoning.
High power achieves a target temperature on the surface of the metal device quickly, before there is much time
for heat to
accumulate in surrounding tissues.
Tacking on industry in general, including producing cement, steel, plastics and chemicals, accounts
for 78 percent of greenhouse gases, which invisibly
accumulate in the atmosphere and trap extra
heat.
More warming is expected as CO2 invisibly
accumulates in the sky, where the molecule persists
for centuries, and then traps more
heat as it insulates the planet.
The overwhelming cause
for the chart - topping warmth is the excess
heat trapped by greenhouse gases
accumulating in Earth's atmosphere.
With Chase bringing the
heat to competitors like American Express with the products like the Chase Sapphire Reserve, Ink Preferred, and Freedom Unlimited, it's very easy (
for someone under 5/24) to quickly
accumulate a ton of Ultimate Rewards.
Over the weekend I noticed a clever new effort to visualize how natural climate variability interacts with the
heating effect from
accumulating greenhouse gases — made by Teddy TV and the animator Ole Christoffer Haga
for the 10 - part math series Siffer on Norway's NRK channel *:
This could in turn help clarify the oceanic pathways
for much of the
heat added to the Earth's climate system by
accumulating greenhouse gases.
If it trapped
heat energy then it would not let it go and all the
heat would have
accumulated in it
for billions of years.
I think I understand the analogy as it pertains to the actual Atlantic Meridional Overturning, but I can not follow how it explains what happens to the
heat that
accumulates as a result of AGW in,
for example, the Sahara Desert, the Amazon Rain Forest, Antartica and Siberia.
Of the
heat accumulating in the upper 1,800 meters of oceans
for 2004 — 2011, 46 percent was sequestered in the deep oceans (below 700 meters) in the Lyman & Johnson data set.
Of the many
heat - trapping gases, CO2 puts us at the greatest risk of irreversible changes if it continues to
accumulate unabated in the atmosphere — as it is likely to do if the global economy remains dependent on fossil fuels
for its energy needs.
# 3: the planet hasn't
accumulated enough» extra»
heat for the last 150y,, to boil one chicken egg!!
For 2004 — 2011, the data show the oceans
accumulating heat at a rate of 0.19 W / m2 (3x1021 J / yr) in the upper 300 meters, 0.30 W / m2 (5x1021 J / yr) in the upper 700 meters, and 0.56 W / m2 (9x1021 J / yr) in the upper 1,800 meters.
For if Apple - lovers count their penny and a half each year, for some periods maybe 3 cents for decades, and for others near nothing for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be accumulated to match their one Oran
For if Apple - lovers count their penny and a half each year,
for some periods maybe 3 cents for decades, and for others near nothing for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be accumulated to match their one Oran
for some periods maybe 3 cents
for decades, and for others near nothing for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be accumulated to match their one Oran
for decades, and
for others near nothing for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be accumulated to match their one Oran
for others near nothing
for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be accumulated to match their one Oran
for a few decades, but the Orange - lovers employ a
heat spike nearly forty times as large, what can be expected other than that decades might elapse, before enough Apples can be
accumulated to match their one Orange?
Many of the projects we look at as being carbon - friendly (i.e. construction of a major green energy or clean transport project) are significantly less so since the big burst of carbon from construction, which happens at the start of the project, hangs around
for decades
accumulating more
heat than early LCAs accounted
for (an abbreviated treatment of this concept is in Kendall, Chang & Sharpe, Environ.
This is a consequence of Kepler's Law
for elliptical orbits whereby Earth travels more slowly during aphelion and hence has longer to
accumulate the
heat that has been reduced by the greater distance.
A new paper by Trenberth et al. (2014) notes that the amount of
heat accumulating in the global climate (most of which is absorbed by the oceans) is generally consistent with the observed global energy imbalance (see the previous post
for further details).
Of the
heat accumulating in the upper 1,800 meters of oceans
for 2004 — 2011, 46 percent was sequestered in the deep oceans (below 700 meters).
Degree
Heating Weeks (DHWs)
for any given time
accumulated HotSpot values ≥ 1 °C over the preceding 12 - week period [10].
Short - term variability is sufficient to account
for changes in ocean
heat without resort to an
accumulating energy imbalance from greenhouse gases.
This assumes that the 1 PPM / degree change has a latent inertia that will
accumulate for awhile (the oceans have a huge latent
heat capacity that will continue to release CO2 until it catches up to the atmospheric steady - state).
LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more
heat / was
accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry
heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate
for the evaporation deficit.
You do have such an amazing molecule in your fictional world, defying gravity it can stay up in the atmosphere
for hundreds and even thousands of years
accumulating though it's one and a half times heavier than air, and, with no
heat capacity to spit at, it can trap
heat, or, heck you can't even get your stories to say the same thing consistently, it becomes this great thermal blanket stopping
heat escaping... just how much of that blanket is holes?
Nice One, there is supposedly a massive energy imbalance daily and constantly, and we ask
for evidence that the
heat is
accumulating in the Earth system.
Unfortunately, what the building global
heat and currently very high greenhouse gas
heat forcing means is that the Earth System will continue to
accumulate warmth
for some time.
Assuming
for the sake of argument that «the pause» is not an instrument error and the troposphere hasn't gotten any warmer in 16 years then this raises the question of how ocean
heat content could be rising which, according to ARGO, at least the upper half of the ocean is
accumulating thermal energy.
For short term predictions, the method uses the classical «state estimation» (Kalman filters), whereby the «state» reflects combinations of
heat quantities
accumulated in the thermal inertia of the oceans.
Question based on Sullivan's explanation of carbon dioxide's role as glass in greenhouse and the inability to vent
accumulated heat to the atmosphere: If a man - made greenhouses on earth must have a venting system to avoid killing the plants protected within, what is the natural venting system
for our planet - greenhouse?
Another point about tropical clouds — since the tropics are the major source of
heat for the climate system — is that a typical day there sees a relatively clear dawn, with clouds gradually
accumulating during the day and precipitation in the afternoon, with the clouds gradually dissipating around dusk.
But
for the oceans, there's plenty of
heat capacity
for heat to
accumulate.
There isn't enough
heat capacity
for heat to
accumulate, so the only way to reach balance is through extra
heat losses from the Earth (to exactly balance the forcing).
And we're somehow supposed to believe that CO2 can
heat the Earth because «science shows by experiment»..., or some out of context laws brought into «scientific truth», so CO2 «well mixed by Brownian motion», and though heavier than air in real life, «it
accumulates into a thick blanket
for hundreds and thousands of years reflecting thermal IR back at us»..
Even if AGW use the unsubstantiated claim that CO2 stays in the atmosphere
accumulating for hundreds and even thousands of years, take your pick, they make up the numbers to suit, and double current amounts actually stayed in the atmosphere, this would be nonsense as «insulating blanket» to not only stop
heat loss globally but raise the global temperature of the Earth.
Total amount of
heat from global warming that has
accumulated in Earth's climate system from 1962 to 2008, from Church et al. (2011)(many thanks to Neil White from the CSIRO
for sharing their data).
For future reference: When I say «
heat sink» I mean something that
accumulates heat (moreso than normal background) and then hits the sensors, in the Tmax and Tmin when it is released.