Many patients have horror stories about how they were treated in conventional settings: rushed appointments, rude staff members, or long waits
for answers to simple questions.
While it could be that they were just calling
for an answer to a simple question, it's possible they intended to make an appointment but weren't asked — or decided not to because of how the call went.
I have been searching everywhere
for an answer to a simple question.
Not exact matches
My unease stemmed from several
questions that didn't have
simple answers: Would I be able
to effectively explain my desires
for any given project?
There's actually a pretty good
answer to this
question — one that's especially relevant
for startups — and a pretty
simple guideline that can help you determine exactly (a) when is the best time
to start hiring some qualified sales managers and (b) whether the time is right
for the CEO
to take a step or two back from the front line, hand off the ball
to the sales team, and focus on doing more valuable things
for the business.
This does not mean, by the way, that employers should drop everything
to answer a
simple question or promote someone who doesn't deserve it; what it means is understanding that this generation is accustomed
to getting quick
answers and quick results, and that leveraging that speed via quick promotions or extra mentoring — only
for those who truly deserve it — will help.
for many people the
answer to that
question is
simple: plenty of capital.
There was a
simple answer to the economic
question: Keystone is the fastest and easiest way
to bring Alberta's oil
to market, which will in turn lower the price of oil by about a dollar per barrel
for every American — regardless of where the stuff is ultimately sold.
The news begged
for a
simple question to be
answered: How could such an obscure concoction ever end up on the menu of an American casual dining chain?
But the
question of why anybody in the secular world would turn
to the Amish
for business advice in the first place is
answered right off the top in Erik Wesner's Success Made
Simple: An Inside Look at Why Amish Businesses Thrive (Jossey - Bass).
Plasticity, which charges clients $ 3
to $ 5 per employee per month
for use of its platform, begins its workplace data collection with a
simple question every user
answers when they sign in: «How happy are you today?»
Before every meeting, Lopp takes a few minutes
for this
simple hack: «Whether I run the meeting or am a participant, I write three
questions that I'd like
to get
answered at this meeting.
The
answer to that
question is
simple: Because it's so hard
to do and it's very inefficient, Niu says, at least if businesses take the «traditional» route of asking
for and then evaluating employee surveys.
For many people, the
answer comes down
to a
simple question: Do you think you'll be better off paying taxes now or later?
As
simple as the
question sounds, it is still the hardest
question for businesses
to answer.
The problem is
simple: Central bankers don't know the
answer to either
question and as a result are unprepared
for the consequences, or even
to recognize them while they are occurring.
The
simple answer to the
question is that the market
for preferred shares contains a large cohort of unsophisticated investors.
There are no
answers to these basic
questions,
for the
simple reason that the whole idea is made up.
I will no longer listen
to them trying not
to answer simple question, I will no longer believe their rhetoric, I will no longer pray
for their salvation, they're on their own.
My life is much
simpler now that I've been able
to replace that list with a single
answer for all of these
questions: There is no God.
Trust me, it's far more work trying
to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one
answer for all the
questions you people flail about trying
to answer and be able
to rely on
simple logic and facts
to conclude there is no god.
While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing
to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used
to respond
to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down
to a very
simple response that doesn't really
answer any
questions for anyone.
To answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so fa
To answer your
question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very
simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path
for the 21st century church
to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so fa
to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so far.
I asked a
simple question and look at the mayhem in your
answers, you fellows are going mad trying
to answer the
question for which you will NEVER know the
answer... NONONO you can't
answer the
question please do not tax your little brains.
1) We're highly evolved primates 2) We have overactive imaginations 3) Our greatest evolutionary asset, our large and highly-folded brains, are also responsible
for an insatiable curiosity 4) As a species, and a survival tactic, we make things up
to comfort ourselves in difficult times 5) As a complex societal species, we create commonalities and «traditions» with others in our clan / tribe / community 6) These «traditions» result in security, trust, and strong relationships that make the collective more able
to survive than the individual 7) These common beliefs also act as a means of numbing the brain
to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible
answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we
simple «are not alive» anymore.
For example, the
answer to age - old Christian
question about what our responsibility is
to the Law of Moses is quite
simple.
The Christian Colorado baker case may be decided by the
answer to a deceptively
simple question: What is society
for?
No, the more basic reason
for the challenge is that this very issue of theism or atheism is too complex
to admit of the
simple either / or kinds of
answers apparently called
for by the
question emblazoned on the cover of Time
for Easter 1966.
People have been asking that
question for thousands of years and yet a
simple «yes» doesn't really
answer it, again, you can go on and keep on believing, I on the other hand have not found sufficient reason
for me
to believe in judaism.
I suggest that the
answer to that
question, and one that comes
to mind immediately
for the one who reads the Bible attentively, is
simple: Our relationship
to the God of the Bible is
to listen
to God so we can love him more deeply and love others more completely.»
The more tragic then — certainly from the standpoint of Judaism, is the failure of many modern Jewish young people
to answer the
simple question: «Who was David and
for what was he noted?»
let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been
for several years, so why can't our management team seem
to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible
answer is we aren't willing
to pay even close
to market value
for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get
to the table we seem
to make insulting bids that
simple infuriate the team in
question...
for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players
to fill our voids, which seems
to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic,
for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed
to be different (sarcasm)
The big
question would be why Wenger didn't persist with the 4 -2-3-1 system,
for which the
answer is very
simple: If you want
to accommodate all your stars — Sanchez, Theo Walcott, Mesut Ozil, Jack Wilshere, Aaron Ramsey, Welbeck and Olivier Giroud.....
The big
question would be why Wenger didn't persist with the 4 -2-3-1 system,
for which the
answer is very
simple: If you want
to accommodate all your stars — Sanchez, Theo Walcott, Mesut Ozil, Jack Wilshere, Aaron Ramsey, Welbeck and Olivier Giroud — in your starting XI, 4 -2-3-1 is not the best possible
answer.
The
simple question is are we happy with scrambling
for 4th place and last 16 of cl... If yes then wenger may well be your man if not then he needs
to go... What Ramsey did as a 17 yr old is irrelevant
to answering this
question....
Time
for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position
to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than
answers...
to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried
to get rid of
for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want
to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem
to have a pretty good history when it comes
to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those
simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers
to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things
to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz
to the starting lineup due
to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition
to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB
to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need
to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need
to target a CDM then do whatever it takes
to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous
for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order
for us
to become dominant again we need
to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper
to CB
to DM
to ACM
to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil
to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed
to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as
for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed
to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal
for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money
for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul...
for me it's time
to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just
to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye
to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need
to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had
to wait so many years
to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes
to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes
to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk
to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid
for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up
for half the price he eventually went
to Juve
for, or that we've only paid any interest
to strikers who were clearly not going
to press their current teams
to let them go
to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants
to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due
to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately
to raise awareness
for several years when cracks began
to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued
to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
There is a
simple answer to that
question and
for me I would try and offload Wootton this summer as quickly as possible.
All you do is sign up
for an account, fill out your user profile by
answering some
simple questions about yourself, family, interests and home, then every Tuesday you get
to select from a variety of samples
to try out
for free!
This is not a
simple question, I turned
to my peers
for answers.
The Natural Breastfeeding program is a perfect fit
for these women because it uses
simple, clear, concise videos and easy exercises
to answer their
questions, all without overburdening them in today's hectic world.
The survey included 28
simple questions that required no more than 15 minutes
for the patient
to answer.
Breastfeeding
Answers Made Simple: A Guide for Helping Mothers by Nancy Mohrbacher, IBCLC, FILCA is a comprehensive, research - based counseling guide that provides the answers to virtually every breastfeeding question in an easy - to - use two - column
Answers Made
Simple: A Guide
for Helping Mothers by Nancy Mohrbacher, IBCLC, FILCA is a comprehensive, research - based counseling guide that provides the
answers to virtually every breastfeeding question in an easy - to - use two - column
answers to virtually every breastfeeding
question in an easy -
to - use two - column format.
Answer a few
simple questions to find out how much Enfamil ® formula your baby will need
for an extended period of time.
In this article, I want
to give you a sense of an
answer for the first two
questions, the «what» and the «how» (like anything else in this world, the
answer to the
question about cost is
simple — «How much do you want
to pay?»).
For instance, I've been trying for a month to get a simple answer to this question: The executive announced in his state of the county address that he intended to sell 70 county properti
For instance, I've been trying
for a month to get a simple answer to this question: The executive announced in his state of the county address that he intended to sell 70 county properti
for a month
to get a
simple answer to this
question: The executive announced in his state of the county address that he intended
to sell 70 county properties.
For example, while he did manage
to go through each and every category the agency has set up
to disburse the allocated funds, he was unable
to answer the
simple question of what was his agency's annual operating budget.
New research presented at the European Planetary Science Congress at UCL aims
to answer the final
question, of whether entry and impact is survivable
for simple organisms.
For centuries this
simple question has been surprisingly difficult
to answer.
As it turns out, the
answer to the
question of whether it's possible
to predict the usefulness of molecular markers
for phylogeographic studies is: it's not always this
simple.
For the near future, we don't see large computing power successfully responding
to the
simple questions facing modern societies with complex
answers:
For instance, how do you motivate Asian governments
to take action on climate change?