Sentences with phrase «for believing in it»

Silva also praised manager Mancini for believing in him after a difficult start to life in English football following his move from Valencia in the summer of 2010.

For the writer to say that the interest in Özil from Barcelona and other club's are lies and that the fan's need their head's examined for believing in these rumours..

I want to thank the entire Michigan coaching staff for believing in me and giving me the opportunity to join their program.

Hey Wenger, Thanks for believing in these young men.

The best case for believing in the Cavs the next few months actually came Wednesday night against the Wolves.

Is it not insulting to other religions to claim your god is the only true one and everyone is fools for believing in a false idol?

I thank God for this opportunity, I thank my parents and coaches for believing in me.

It's not fun when someone does that to you, like how big of a moron you must be for believing in a Magical Bang that thrust everything into existence... Especially when Basic Physics disproves that theory and nobody is even close to coming up with an answer for «what would cause such a thing» they've just conceptualized an answer to make idiots like you believe in a Man as if he has all the answers....

Now why in your mind is it okay for you to bash me for believing in an omnipotent God that created the Universe, and sent his son to basically teach us how to live, his life is recorded in history and his followers recorded his existence and his acts and indeed the miracles he performed.

«and you're callin me an idiot for believing in an Omnipotent Being that initiated the creation of the Universe and at a point in Human history sent his son to teach us all how to live properly and be kind to our neighbors and showed us how to be forgiven for the bad stuff we do... And this is crazier in your mind»

I agree with you that «the totality of interacting things», as Father Stanley Jaki likes to call the universe, (along with your Editorial comment, March / April 2007) is the first and best reason for believing in the existence of a Creator.

You're slamming someone for believing in God's law.

The largest Nation in existence at its time Rome, the very same that put him to the cross later Bowed to him... Thousands witnessed his Miracles and converted on the spot... and this is all recorded historically... unlike many religions around the globe, this was witnessed and recorded... yet you refuse to believe it... But you are so quick to jump on the bandwagon and believe what a scientist postulated... a theory that requires as much if not more faith to believe in than Any religion... A theory that if you believe... you must throw out the natural laws of Physics...... But you call me stupid for believing in God... Wow... My bad i guess i should believe in Magical particles that always existed that randomly exploded and caused everything to exist....

However, we must have some grounds for believing in such promises of an ultimately fulfilling and «impossible» future.

First, it undercut the most powerful common sense reason for believing in God.

Just don't suggest that I'm a liar for suggesting that I've given reason for believing in God.

Surely there a case for believing in some thoughts and holding onto them and holding onto other thoughts loosely.

It's just so frustrating that there are so many delusional people who will believe in something for which there is no rational basis for believing in it.

For example, I am not at all phased by an email informing me that I am headed straight for hell for believing in evolution and «worshipping at the monkey god's feet.»

In Hartshorne's «Grounds for Believing in God's Existence,» presented at the Boston University Institute for Philosophy and Religion, October 17, 1979, together with «Comments on Hartshorne on God,» by W. V. Quine.

«No reasons for God's existence or nature» does not imply «no reasons for our believing in that existence.»

Because the theory of gravity is an claim supported by evidence, I doubt anyone here would feel you were attacking us personally for believing in the science.

Can you name one atheist who killed people solely for believing in their god, instead of tyrant wanting to control the populace?

He has a big hole in his head for believing in invisible people, I know that.

God is big and he put me here, thanks to my church @casadepodermiami and my pastor @aarongbernal THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU Thanks to @katyperry @lionelrichie @lukebryan for believing in me ❤️ ✨.

Is there a basis for believing in God as a result of the imageless thinking of mathematics and physics?

chick fila did nt kick up a controversy cnn did and now that they have spent 6 days attacking the chick for believing in god they thought they should attack other christian companies for believing in a god as well shame on you cnn for your bigotry and shame on all you hate filled commenters on here day in and day out attacking 97 % of the world for believing in a god because statistics prove time and again less then 3 % of the world is athiest

He has been reproached by sociologists for believing in the omnipotence of the scholarly analyst of the laboratory without ever having used the laboratory, and for explaining events as the function of «technical» expressions which hide reality from him in the same manner that the accounts of corporations are carefully edited and kept from the public by so - called «experts.»

It would be so nice to talk to people who don't call you stupid for believing in God, or claim you're going to hell because you aren't a far right extremist.

But if your an atheist (which I was at one point in my life a long time ago) then please don't call me stupid for believing in God.

It's always best to be able to justify your reasons for believing in something.

You accept the «leap of faith» as a valid basis for believing in god in the absence of evidence, but fail to see that this makes you a pantheist, because you have to accept that the same leap can be made to any god with equal validity.

Some countries, like North Korea would have me executed for believing in Jesus and carrying a book.

Faith is not merely a polite expression for unsubstantiated assertion, not an excuse for believing in God as an irrational act.

I do not hate a child for believing in Santa.

As an evolutionary biologist he could see no basis for believing in the mysterious «emergence» of completely novel properties as organisms became more complex.

The images and the hopes they embodied were not essentially altered, rather, occasion was given for believing in their reality.

And we will be teaching our children to tell your children that they are weak minded individuals for believing in the most arrogant and egotistical religion that ever hit the face of the planet...

Catechesis, it seems to me, should begin with the basics, so that children and teenagers are given reasons for believing in God, God made Man, and the Church rather than just being told that Jesus loves them.

Ok, typical atheist who says your «stupid» or «crazy» for believing in intelligent design.

Ive heard two athiests going at each others throats, one for believing in the concept of good, and the other claiming theres no such thing as good.

But don't call it anti-American, and I won't call you anti-American for believing in a different America.

I don't care if an atheist thinks I'm unintelligent for believing in intelligent design.

@Pedro» I don't care if an atheist thinks I'm unintelligent for believing in intelligent design.

I should rather attack others for believing in something greater than themselves?

However, most, if not all Christians use Pascal's Wager as a valid reason for believing in the Christian narrative.

But they don't think they are nuts for believing in their one god.

If I'm right the cost paid by mankind for believing in supernatural nonsense is nearly immeasurable.

I often felt guilty that my main reason for believing in God was fear of hell.

On the contrary, it is an argument for believing in the face of a paucity of evidence, and is thoroughly fallacious all the same.