Sentences with phrase «for budget transfers»

Not exact matches

Technology transfer is not for every business, but it certainly is not reserved for mega corporations with large budgets.

This chart shows the three broad factors accounting for the decline in the medium - term outlook of Government of Canada Transfers since the 2013 Budget.

However, a budget deficit that takes the form of transfer payments to banks, as in the case of the post-September 2008 bank bailout, the Federal Reserve's $ 2 trillion in cash - for - trash financial swaps and the $ 700 billion QE2 credit creation by the Federal Reserve to lend to banks at 0.25 % interest in 2011, has a different effect from deficits that reflect social spending programs, Social Security and Medicare, public infrastructure investment or the purchase of other goods and services.

Expenses for other direct program expenses (excluding other transfer payments) could be $ 2 billion higher than estimated in Budget 2012, especially if the Government decides to book the shortfall in the environmental liability as identified by the Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development.

NDP promises include a two point cut in the small business tax rate (already implemented in the budget by the Conservatives); extension of the accelerated capital cost allowance for two years (also already implemented by the Conservatives); an innovation tax credit for machinery used in research and development; an additional one cent of gas tax for the provinces for infrastructure; a transit infrastructure fund; increased funding for social housing; a major child care initiative; increasing ODA funding to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI); and restoring the 6 % annual escalator to the Canada Health Transfer.

Although the forecast for budgetary revenues appears to be on track, with higher - than - expected personal income tax revenues more than offsetting lower - than - expected Goods and Service Tax revenues, the Budget 2012 estimate for other transfer payments appears to be significantly overstated.

The spending estimates for statutory programs, such as major transfers to persons and other levels of government, should be based on the latest economic data contained in the Budget for that year.

We continue to believe that the March 2011 Budget estimate for total expenses is overstated, especially for «Other transfer payments» and «Other program expenses for departments and agencies».

For state and local governments, the statutory requirements for balanced budgets meant that fiscal policies turned restrictive relatively quickly once budget surpluses and rainy day funds were exhausted, and this was only temporarily mitigated by federal transfers to the states as part of the initial fiscal stimulus progrFor state and local governments, the statutory requirements for balanced budgets meant that fiscal policies turned restrictive relatively quickly once budget surpluses and rainy day funds were exhausted, and this was only temporarily mitigated by federal transfers to the states as part of the initial fiscal stimulus progrfor balanced budgets meant that fiscal policies turned restrictive relatively quickly once budget surpluses and rainy day funds were exhausted, and this was only temporarily mitigated by federal transfers to the states as part of the initial fiscal stimulus program.

Instead, the federal government has introduced changes to programs (Canada Health Transfer, elderly benefits, etc.) in the Budget Implementation Bill, without providing a proper context for the need for change.

The $ 6.2 billion cost to the federal government will not add to the budget deficit as it will be counted as a cash - for - asset transfer, in the same way as the national broadband network.

It is interesting to note that the March 2011 Budget stated that the transfers to provinces for the Canada Health Transfer and the Canada Social Transfer post 2013 - 14 are subject to change.

However, we hope that the Minister will present a credible outlook for «other transfer expenses» in his upcoming budget, which would then show a much larger and credible improvement in the deficit outlook between 2011 - 12 and 2012 - 13.

The 2017 Budget forecast an increase in major transfers to persons of 5.4 % for the year as a whole.

for the year as a whole Other transfers to business, students, aboriginals, farmers, etc. declined by $ 463 million -LRB--2.0 %), primarily due to the inclusion of disaster assistance liabilities during the first half of 2016 - 17 and the timing of recent budget initiatives.

for the year as a whole Other transfers to business, students, aboriginals, farmers, etc. increased by $ 620 million (3.8 %), primarily due to the timing of recent budget initiatives affecting most components.

The same is true for direct program expenses, were transfer payments are $ 2 billion lower in 2014 - 15 than in the March 2010 Budget, after adjusting for the new policy measures.

Although APIs have been in wide use on the Internet for over a decade, they haven't played a role in the more recent explosion of third - party apps like Venmo and Mint, which let consumers transfer and budget money through features that banks themselves have been slow to provide.

It's why the board who for all their penny pinching faults (make no mistake this has always been the board and not wenger) have shaken up the scouting / negotiation side of the club (contray to claims of war behind the scenes, wenger has never handled these in the first place and still as ever has final say on transfers just not on the budget.)

Our transfer budget for next summer will hugely depend on how far we go in this season's champions league.

With decisive games coming up against Juventus and Inter, it could all depend on the outcomes of these two encounters and it may well have a knock - on effect in terms of determining their budget for the summer transfer window.

Apart from my personal opinion that he is the main one responsible for our poor transfer budgets and lack of ambition for the club since he became majority shareholder but worse still he has now shown who he really is by the launch of the appalling hunting channel just launched in the UK by the company that he owns!

he is not desperate for success, if he was desperate to succeed he would have pressure the board to back him heavily in the transfer market, that's if they are not already backing him, because I seriously doubt our transfer budget was just 46 million that we spent on lacazette, because kolasinac was a free transfer, not forgetting we sold players like Gibbs and chamberlain but still can't buy players to strengthen our squad

i think wenger makes the list of players he wants and then sends his negotiating team to sort out the transfer i.e gazidis and dicky law (who is very good as he is multi lingual and has many contacts around south america / spain very handy) to sort out the finer details (get a cheaper deal) of the deal, and broker terms and then it gets presented to the board (who give wenger and gazidis the budget to which they work with) for final approval.

However, it seems like exciting times coming to the Emirates, with a record transfer budget for Wenger to spend and quality young players like Jack Wilshere getting better and better.

You say Wenger was given a transfer budget of # 50M then blame him personally for not spending - he's already spent most of that.

The Dortmund duo are said to be available for a combined fee of # 31m, well within Arsenal's transfer budget.

At Man City Txiki Begiristain and Franco Baldini (Tottenham) have been heavily criticised for burning transfer budgets.

I think it will be nearly impossible with AW's summer transfer budget to spend BIG on a Varane, Laporte, Godin, Ramos, when it seems the boss is ready to offer $ 15M plus for either Schederlien, Bender, Gonalons, Illarmenda (sp?)

The former Barcelona boss has been handed a # 100m transfer budget but will have to beat off competition from Real Madrid in the race for the White Hart Lane star.

A bigger transfer budget I suppose, he never really meant to stay in Dortmund for long.

(Funny thing: Arsenal «fanz» are real losers if they can not figure out that our team can not compete when transfer budgets for the competition is beyond our team's reach.)

Pozzo has been voted the best chairman in Italy on multiple occasions for keeping Udinese competitive on a very tight budget, and making millions in the transfer market through their extensive scouting network that allows them to regularly identify undervalued prospects.

The right winger has a # 5m release clause that is clearly well within the Blues transfer budget and given all the talk of possible exits for Andre Schurrle and Mohamed Salah it's perhaps not surprising that Mourinho would be linked with a wide - attacking signing.

Some you may be impatient and in your fantasies wanted Wenger to spend 200 million instantly, but Arsenal has a budget each year for transfers and Wenger maximizes that limited budget.

By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one of the most important transfer windows of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke of the highest order, lack of respect, lack of shame and lack order, i despise him

I understand what the author is saying but worth say the truth: it is not Wenger setting the season ticket prices and it is not Wenger responsible for the transfer budget.

So instead of our team going forwards as we expected it to do after the club's financial burden was lifted and Arsene Wenger was given a decent transfer budget once more, we seem to be going backwards in terms of challenging for the Premier League title and if you don't believe me then maybe you should believe the boss because he suggested the same after the latest defeat.

So if Ospina is sold for a decent fee then our original reported 70m transfer budget would be in full tact.

He is a great player but with our own Giroud in great form and still improving at centre forward and with great options up front in Alexis, Walcott and Welbeck, as well as promising young strikers like Akpom, Campbell and Sanogo trying to break through, I don't see a striker as a big transfer priority for the summer, especially if it is going to use up the lion's share of our budget.

With so much depth on our team, I see the next transfer window where we spend are entire budget for that sought striker.

I'm guessing that Wenger is waiting to see if he can persuade Mbappe to come to Arsenal before he starts making serious bids for other targets, that's simply because the signing of that youngster will chew up the majority of his transfer budget.

If pep had to have 1 year plus 400m to rebuild an ageing city squad, with less transfer budget (blame kroenke not me) we would need at least 3 years to challenge for the title.

John Ibrahim, I'm sick off you saying that Max Allegri requires a heavy budget, other managers you mention yes but the only transfer window in the last 5 years where Jueventus have spent heavy was last year and that was because they got # 89 million pounds for Pogba and spent it on Higuain.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

In fact they are going to0 have a nice wedgeof cash to add to their transfer budget for the January transfer window and that is likely to be bad news for the Gunners as we hope to complete a few good signings of our own and catch the current league leaders in the second half of the season.

Wenger has dismissed concerns over the club's transfer dealings, using the example of Manchester United's shock # 36million move for Anthony Martial as proof that while each of Europe's elite clubs — including Arsenal — have the budget for signings, top quality players are at a premium.

Come on guys... you know if our budget is # 173 million, only # 1.73 is available for transfers.

Stop moaning everyone we have just bought a striker a 15 year old kid from Ipswich for 100,000 that's the budget gone till next transfer window!!

As long as they back and fund the wenger / next manager with as much transfer money in every window they can afford them fro the budget i would guess # 70 million in summer windows and # 30 - # 40 in January window will suffice a new manager would work wonders with that size budget, and i think we are a good draw for any new manager we are the arsenal any manager would want to manage us, as for wenger i do nt know if he will last the distance on this contract if we scrap top 4 that would be a lucky escape for this season the way it is going atm.