Cynical distortions paid
for by fossil fuel companies in apparently credible media outlets is a very disturbing trend, and I applaud Dr. Hansen for pointing this out.
The failure to address the Hoffert et al energy technology question is reflected in the fact that since 2000 (and including 2013) the share of global energy consumption accounted
for by fossil fuels has remained essentially constant at 86.5 - 87.0 %.
First, there is the problem of Lewandowsky's assumptions: he confuses categories of economic and environmental ideas; he fails to test for conspiracy theories that might be more coincident with environmentalism than the ones he chose, (for example the idea that climate scepticism is a phenomenon produced by covert PR operations, paid
for by fossil fuel companies); and he fails to achieve a robust definition of climate scepticism.
Lacis did not like the use of «very likely» by the AR4 report because to him it is obvious first that the CO2 increase is more than accounted
for by fossil fuel emissions, and second that the global temperature rise is more than accounted for by the expected effects of increased CO2.
And so the world's most comprehensive assessment of climate science is forced to at least consider pseudo-science fully paid
for by the fossil fuel industry.
All too often, our decision makers are bought and paid
for by the fossil fuel industry.
The only thing making the public stupider is the never ending denialism paid
for by the fossil fuel industry and propagated by the likes of Faux Newsfotainment.
... or unfortunately... as I just saw two weeks ago a journal article that had obviously been paid
for by the fossil fuel industry.
Not exact matches
Fossil fuel usage, meanwhile, is expected to hit its ceiling in 2030 at 2.93 billion tons of oil equivalent with coal expected to continue as the top energy source
for China
by 2050.
As the Washington Post reported, natural gas is overtaking coal as the
fossil fuel of choice
for electricity generation — the report forecasts that
by 2019, coal will provide 28 % of US electricity, whereas natural gas will make up 34 %.
As I wrote
for NOVA Next, Germany stabilized its grid and electricity supply
by dialing up its
fossil fuel, nuclear, and hydro power, while also asking four energy - hogging aluminum smelters to dial down their power use temporarily.
Thursday's tax reform bill maintains tax breaks
for fossil fuel, but removes a $ 7,500 credit
for electric cars and cuts the benefit from a wind credit
by a third.
Besides, as some savvy environmentalists are arguing, trying to reduce GHG emissions
by chocking
fossil fuel supplies — rather than reducing demand
for them — is tilting at windmills.)
The first is climate change, exacerbated
by the greenhouse gases we encourage
by burning
fossil fuels, cutting down forests, and farming the way we do (particularly
for meat production).
As he prodded the prime minister, Nye, best known as the host of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the Science Guy,» and more recently
for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the World,» cited a study
by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without
fossil fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy sources.
China has already hit peak coal, but the
fossil fuel does still account
for 65 % of the country's power generated
by source.
While Germany's official Energiewende strategy calls
for a transition from
fossil fuel and nuclear energy to renewable energy, and reduction of emissions
by 40 percent
by 2020 compared to 1990 levels, the recently formed German government is more conservative than the previous governments.
Over a year which has seen large banks halt funding
for fossil fuel projects, major institutions divest from oil, gas and coal holdings, and oil companies snap up power and renewables companies in a bid to diversify their asset base, research published today
by the UK Sustainable Investment and Finance Association (UKSIF) and the Climate Change Collaboration suggests nervousness over climate risk has shot up in financial circles.
If you don't think people consume too much
by way of
fossil fuels, then there's no need
for a carbon tax.»
Furthermore, efforts at oil giant Royal Dutch Shell RDS.A, +0.62 % to move beyond
fossil fuels into low - carbon energy is as much driven
by the growth potential of alternative energy markets as a concern
for global warming.
Investing
for impact in public equities can include divesting from companies considered harmful to the environment, as embodied
by 350.org's
fossil fuel divestment campaign.
A research and public engagement project investigating the power of the
fossil fuel industry in Western Canada, led
by the University of Victoria, Canadian Centre
for Policy Alternatives (BC and Saskatchewan Offices) and Parkland Institute.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements
for institutional investors to report on how their investment policies and performance are affected
by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued
fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related issues.37
For example, if the world population hits only 8.3 billion
by 2050 instead of the 9.7 billion figure typically cited
by the UN,
fossil fuel consumption could end up being 17 percent lower in 2050 than the oil industry thinks.
The will to overlook accelerated climate change caused
by the extraction of tar sands oil, the destruction of the carbon sink that is / was the boreal forest, and the continued burning of
fossil fuels to power trips to the corner store
for a creamy, etc..
Further, many of those attempting to undercut this 97 percent claim are doing so from a place of bias — be they funded
by or indebted to the
fossil fuel industry, or are pro-
fossil fuels for economic reasons (and ignoring environmental reasons).
For example, who really notices that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased
by 25 per cent since the middle of the nineteenth century (as a result of the burning of
fossil fuels, along with destruction of rainforests)?
This offers some hope
for future generations who will have to consider carefully the means
by which energy is supplied as
fossil fuels begin to diminish but the demands
for energy increase.
Industrialized countries with less than a quarter of the world's population are responsible
for about three - quarters of the carbon dioxide released
by burning
fossil fuels.
By far the most important source of disruption of the environment comes from the use of
fossil fuels for energy.
Small increases per person can have an enormous effect when multiplied
by huge numbers of people, as
for example in China and India, if, as they propose, they increase their use of
fossil fuels in the near future.
The plant's water recovery plant exceeded its designers» high expectations in its first year of service while also providing valuable biogas
for boiler heating, reducing its dependence on
fossil fuels and ultimately cutting overall energy needs
by 15 per cent.
The company believes that
by collaborating with customers, governments, NGOs, and thought leaders we can help find solutions to such global challenges as providing enough healthy food
for people everywhere, decreasing dependence on
fossil fuels, and protecting life and the environment.
The waste water treatment and green energy plant at the $ 120 million Pacific Beverages» Bluetongue Brewery in NSW also provides valuable renewable energy
for the brewery, reducing its dependence on
fossil fuels and ultimately cutting overall energy needs
by 15 per cent.
Mr Bambridge says this the plant indirectly reduces the brewery's carbon footprint
by reducing the brewery's demands on
fossil fuels and the electricity needs
for wastewater treatment
by using energy - friendly anaerobic pre-treatment technology in which GWE is a world leader.
The economy is primarily driven
by primary industry, natural resources and secondary industry including coal mining, processing and
fossil -
fuel power generation [8]
for the National Electricity Market.
On top of that, organic farming reduces non-renewable energy use
by decreasing the need
for chemicals, which require high quantities of
fossil fuel to be produced.
They can support sustainable energy sources
for home electricity — and move away from
fossil fuels —
by signing up
for «Make the Switch,» a partnership between Mass Audubon and the nonprofit Massachusetts Energy Consumers Alliance (Mass Energy).
In her first major environmental proposal, Nixon called on New York State to commit to 100 percent renewable energy sources
by 2050 — a benchmark that has been something of a Holy Grail
for activists concerned about the warming of the planet as a result of the burning of
fossil fuels.
The reasons
for the continuing support
for nuclear energy
by political parties of all colours is simple: our dependence on
fossil fuels poses real risks to the country's energy security, the environment and energy prices.
Hawkins also said
for Earth Day that New York should commit to 100 % clean energy
by 2030, stop all new
fossil fuel infrastructure and enact a carbon tax.
Not only will these projects benefit our environment
by reducing dependence on
fossil fuels and using renewable energy, but they are also creating well - paying jobs
for New Yorkers.
Cuomo's own rhetoric isn't consistent — his State of the State book
for 2017 included a clear policy statement: «the State must double down
by investing in the fight against dirty
fossil fuels and fracked gas from neighboring states.»
He will also address the upcoming Earth Day holiday, and New York's need
for 100 % clean energy
by 2030, stopping all new
fossil fuel infrastructure, and enacting a carbon tax.
Howie Hawkins Is Running
for Governor to «Demand More» Wants NY to Commit to 100 % Clean Energy
by 2030, Halt
Fossil Fuels, Jobs Urges Increase in State Revenue Sharing to Lower Property Tax
Howie Hawkins, the recent Green Party candidate
for Governor, called today upon Governor Cuomo to acknowledge the climate change is being caused
by human activity, starting with the burning of
fossil fuels.
«Money from megadonors from multibillion dollar
fossil fuel industry should be rejected
by all Long Island elected officials,» said Diane Goins of Hempstead, chairwoman of the Long Island Chapter of New York Communities
for Change, a nonprofit coalition of working families in low and moderate income communities.
«And John Faso took money from
fossil fuel companies as they tried to take your land
by eminent domain
for a fracked gas pipeline.»
«Now that New York has built a foundation
for the renewable energy system of the future, the state must double down
by investing in the fight against dirty
fossil fuels and fracked gas from neighboring states,» Cuomo said in his 2017 state - of - the - state address.
The worldwide push
for government entities to drop investments in
fossil fuels comes home to roost in the Empire State: this week New York legislators, led by Senator Liz Krueger, introduced the Fossil Fuel Divestment Act, which would require Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to divest the Common Retirement Fund's holdings in the top 200 fossil fuel companies by
fossil fuels comes home to roost in the Empire State: this week New York legislators, led
by Senator Liz Krueger, introduced the
Fossil Fuel Divestment Act, which would require Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to divest the Common Retirement Fund's holdings in the top 200 fossil fuel companies by
Fossil Fuel Divestment Act, which would require Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to divest the Common Retirement Fund's holdings in the top 200 fossil fuel companies by 2
Fuel Divestment Act, which would require Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to divest the Common Retirement Fund's holdings in the top 200
fossil fuel companies by
fossil fuel companies by 2
fuel companies
by 2020.