Sentences with phrase «for centuries because»

The footprints left by Apollo astronauts will last for centuries because there is no wind on the Moon.

Though scientists warn that global warming will likely continue for centuries because of the long natural processes involved, there are a few things we can do to decrease the effects.

Although docking ears and tails were the standard for centuries because of the dog's roll as a ratter, it is now less fashionable, and in some countries, illegal.

Drinking tea for constipation has been in use for centuries because of the relief it provides, soothing properties, and the ease of preparation.

Healers have used them for centuries because dandelions are renowned for supporting healthy liver function and are packed with calcium, iron, fiber, vitamins A, C, E and K and powerful antioxidants such as beta - carotene and lutein (great for healthy eyesight!).

The central construct of the piece is the decagram, a type of 10 - pointed star, which Persian artists have incorporated into their art for centuries because of its geometric properties.

It takes a long time for the ocean to respond to increasing heat, so even if greenhouse gas emissions dropped to zero tomorrow, the world's seas would continue to rise for centuries because of the warming that's already happened.

Writing in the Daily Mirror, Lord Prescott said, «Leaving a union that has delivered huge cultural, social and economic benefits for millions of people for centuries because you don't like Cameron and Osborne is like walking away from a fight with Lord Snooty and his Posh Pals.»

So apparently, God «inspires» the hebrew scriptures first through Moses then through Judges and Kings and prophets keeps adding to the bible for centuries because apparently God had to keep refining his word.

That's why gays have been presecuted by Christians for centuries because of the prejudice lies that the Church spews about them.

Crazy nut jobs like you have been saying that for centuries because your cult is so good at brainwashing idiots like you.

Resurrect him from the dead for another century because we're scared of change?

We have succeeded for a century because we care about making our state a better place to live, work and grow.

Not exact matches

«It's one of the things that makes me optimistic about America because when I look at what we have accomplished using half our talent for a couple of centuries, and now I think of doubling the talent that is effectively employed — or at least has the chance to be — it makes me very optimistic about this country,» Buffett says.

Cambodia stagnated for the latter part of the 20th century partly because of internal conflict and the lack of infrastructure in rural areas.

Because for more than half a century Hawking could only look ahead to more paralysis.

They are complaining about countries working with China which are not even the EU members — some of them merely looking for an associate status because a full membership is a drawn - out obstacles race at the mercy of centuries - old regional hatreds and rivalries.

«The financial industry has been subject to regulation for a century, and the tech industry has largely skated by without being subject to any similar regulatory framework because it's still relatively new,» she said.

Whereas Britain may not have been an engine of growth for 18th Century India, or at least for the Indian textile industry, it was for much of the 19th Century the world's engine of growth because it supplied much of the capital that a savings - starved world needed to fund investment.

MH: Because they need altogether about $ 5 trillion to create... If they're going to create 500 billionaires to run the country for the next century and to create really a new feudal class they need $ 5 trillion and they don't want the people to know what's occurring because if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alterBecause they need altogether about $ 5 trillion to create... If they're going to create 500 billionaires to run the country for the next century and to create really a new feudal class they need $ 5 trillion and they don't want the people to know what's occurring because if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alterbecause if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alternative.

The reality is, our organization has been focused on issues that are region - wide for more than a century, because we understand that regional vision, leadership, and collaboration is critical to the success of not just our local economy, but the B.C. and Canadian economies as well.

For centuries, gold has been the object of desire and envy for many people because of its beauty, allure and worFor centuries, gold has been the object of desire and envy for many people because of its beauty, allure and worfor many people because of its beauty, allure and worth.

From the perspective of someone interested in making investments with 20 + year holding periods in mind, you need to be careful of owning banks because of the debt to equity levels involved in the investment, you need to be wary of technology companies because they must constantly be innovating to remain profitable and relevant (unlike, say, Hershey, which could stick with its business model of selling chocolate bars for the next century), and retail stocks which are always subject to the risk of a new low - cost carrier arriving on the block.

We've designed Darico as a crypto asset that avoids these problems because gold, which for centuries has been used as a physical reserve asset, gives Darico holders exposure to the conventional asset markets.»

Such statutes have existed for centuries, precisely because memories fade, evidence degrades, and circumstances become clouded with time.

Christians have been claiming this for centuries and it's still untrue because your god doesn't exist.

Moreover, it is demeaning to suggest that Paul VI affirmed the Church's classic position on marital love and procreation (which had been held for centuries by virtually every Christian community until the Anglican Communion broke ranks at the 1930 Lambeth Conference) because he was afraid that changing the traditional position would unravel the entire body of Catholic moral teaching.

If what I think is going to happen economically does happen, he will forever be known as the 21st century Herbert Hoover and the GOP will be out of power for the next 40 years, as they deserve to because they created this current economic mess back with Reagan's cut taxes but not cut spending starting in 1980.

Also, despite the popular beleif for centuries among agnostics that pontius pilate did not exist because there was no historical record of him, evidence was uncovered in recent decades that says he did in fact exist.

Well if it's slightly more evidence of the existence of a man outside of Italy in the 1st century who was born of a virgin, died for 3 days before resurrecting himself, then explained he only died because of «original sin» which is the idea that a woman ate magical apple given from a talking snake in a garden at the beginning of time which caused all humans to go to hell when they died.

It was consequential not merely because John Paul himself became the «singular embodiment of the trials, tragedies, and triumphs of the second half of the twentieth century,» but because he «reinvigorated the Church spiritually and intellectually, restoring a sense of the adventure of discipleship... and constantly reminding the entire Church that it did not exist for its own sake, but for its evangelical mission.»

Unfortunately, though, with people being discouraged to pursue the liberal arts in the 21st century, openings for these positions are becoming few and far between, and people who have that philosophical blood running through their veins sometimes take on preacher positions as a way to make ends meat, which is wrong because it is the essence of living a lie.

The Jewish scholar Joseph Klausner, for example, holds that the Pharisees and Sadducees were justified in their attacks on Jesus because he imperiled Jewish culture at its foundations, and that by ignoring everything that belongs to wholesome social life he undercut the work of centuries.2 Others within the Christian tradition have felt considerable uneasiness lest the words of Jesus about nonresistance imperil the civil power of the State, or his words about having no anxiety for food or drink or other material possessions curtail an economic motivation essential to society.

Perhaps because he was forced to exist for so many centuries as an exile in alien religious worlds, the Jew has been prepared to live in faith in a Godless world, and therein to preserve the name of the Lord, even if that name must now be named as no - thing - ness.

Precisely because, among other reasons, they concluded that that which they had hoped and struggled for all their lives» repairing the breach of the sixteenth century» was simply not in the cards.

We twentieth - century Americans work because it is useful for us to do so.

But in this country there is not the sharp black - and - white contrast between Christians and pagans, largely, I believe, because the whole life of the country has been soaked for many centuries in the Christian tradition.

This may be partly because the moderns had some success in undermining confidence in the classic proofs by their criticism without winning any lasting confidence in their own, but the main cause is not any defect in the proofs for the existence of God, at least in the classic proofs, but the general discredit which has fallen upon all systems of thought which ante-date the last century.

Two and a half centuries later the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in the «Preface to the Second Edition» of his Critique of Pure Reason (1787), appropriated this «Copernican Revolution» in thought for his own shift from the presumed objectivity of what we know to the act of conscious knowing itself.2 It remains a contestable assessment because the movement is precisely in the opposite direction: After Copernicus, we humans are no longer understood to be in the center of the universe, whereas Kant concentrated precisely on the subjectivity of individual knowing.

As late as the 16th century Martin Luther the «father of the Protestant Reformation» was still arguing for the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation to be dropped from the New Testament altogether because he perceived them to go against some of the doctrines he was promoting.

It may seem as if we do because (and this is very important) for centuries, males were viewed as superior and thus held authority over females.

But all will agree in recognizing that early in the first century in Palestine there lived a man «mighty in word and deed» whose brief career, for the most part hidden from us, was an event of incalculable magnitude, not only because of its effects but because of what it was.

After all, Christians worshiped Jesus for several centuries before any of them thought to argue that God created the world out of nothing, and Augustine found the «books of the Platonists» so convincing mainly because the Manichaeans made such a muddle of their version of materialism.

It is quite probably older than R. Meir himself (second century AD), having been attributed to him because of his reputation for parables:

At the moment the boast that they have given back some robbed property to the Christian Church, but they conceal that they have persecuted the Church for centuries and that there are nearly no more Christians in Turkey, because many Christian have been killed by the Turks and displaced.

Consequently, because women are rejecting the idea that family itself is more important than one's own physical well - being, the violence that has been hidden for centuries is finally being talked about, and emerging into public view, And that's the very sore «problem» called «family violence» of which we're becoming increasingly aware.

Thats why we can't tolerate that type of exploitation any longer, because the zombies it creates linger for CENTURIES.

... when you've said for centuries that all words of all popes are forever correct (because the RCC made up a doctrine to «prove» it... just because the RCC said so makes it so????) HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!

For centuries it has been argued on the one side that someone else — Sir X or the Earl of Y — was the author, not just because of a possible anagram here or there, but basically because it is beyond belief that a simple country boy, relatively unschooled, would be capable of producing the Shakespeare corpus.

It's like saying just because children for centuries have been afraid of something being under their bed that the boogie man must be hard wired into humans.