Sentences with phrase «for chargebacks»

Such companies use three bank accounts — an operating account, a trust account, and a processing account where funds for chargebacks can be held apart from pooled trust funds.

Many merchants don't, and are easy targets for chargebacks, even when they have, in fact, provided the good or service.

If chargebacks amount to more than the amount Dating Factory is holding, Dating Factory reserves the right to seek reimbursement for these chargebacks from the Partner via any necessary action.

This is mostly due to the fact that these services deal with chargebacks while Bitcoin by its very nature doesn't allow for chargebacks.

When an Erie County resident chooses to attend a community college in a neighboring county, say Niagara or Genesee, Erie County receives a bill at the end of the year for chargeback fees.

As others have said, this is not a valid use for chargeback; that is when a fraudulent charge occurred, or when a merchant charges you incorrectly.

My question is if the customer took the steps to get the courts involved, can they now ask for chargeback?

Financial record keeping that included daily expenses and all sales transactions for chargeback's or audit

Not exact matches

A merchant's particular chargeback risk is one of the most important deciding factors in the risk / benefit scenario for waiting or upgrading now.

If the product they sold is defective or the customer service team does a poor job of handling complaints, your sales team's morale will drop, especially if they're getting chargebacks for cancellations and refunds.

«The problem is, with credit cards, a lot of times your funds can be locked up for a week or more and there held in a sort of escrow in case someone requests a chargeback,» says White.

Visa and MasterCard have threatened fines and account termination for sellers whose chargebacks exceed either 1 % of transactions or 2.5 % of monthly sales.

These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

One of the biggest issues for businesses today is chargeback fees, which are being linked more to what's termed «friendly fraud» with consumers trying to get out of paying for merchandise or services they have received.

The chargeback process is designed to increase consumer confidence — it's very easy for credit card users to dispute charges, while businesses and banks have to do all of the legwork to figure out whether or not a transaction is legitimate.

Companies have never been more held accountable for fraudulent charges and chargeback fees than they are today.

Credit and debit cards are subject to high risks of fraud and chargebacks, creating higher time, opportunity, and financial costs for merchants to accept payments.

Crypto e-payments companies are constantly introducing new technologies and features that could potentially decrease transaction costs and provide instant settlements for retailers, while also eliminating the issue of fraudulent chargebacks.

For these merchants, having point - to - point encryption solutions are more significant than the chargeback risk posed by EMV, because there's ROI to assess.

«It came out of nowhere and I think it's largely a systems issue,» he added, while also noting that despite the recent uptick in chargebacks those merchants that have terminals equipped for EMV (even if they can't officially accept it) are still in a less risky spot.

Carcillo made the distinction that for quick - serve restaurants, where smaller transactions may lessen the severity of chargebacks, enabling the acceptance of EMV payments is less of a concern.

Disadvantages: due to the insecurity of credit cards, chargeback risk is a big problem; due to chargeback risk, fees for using credit cards to buy bitcoin are very high

Disadvantages: due to the insecurity of credit cards, chargeback risk is a big problem; due to chargeback risk, fees for using credit cards to buy bitcoin can be high.

due to the insecurity of credit cards, chargeback risk is a big problem; due to chargeback risk, fees for using credit cards to buy bitcoin

To protect themselves from chargebacks, exchanges make clients wait for several days to get bitcoin, not allow credit card payments, set low limits on trades, or often, do all of the above.

For the forex platform, bitcoin removes the cost of credit card fees and the risk of chargebacks on what are typically large payments.

It's no surprise that gift card marketplaces have been some of the first large e-commerce businesses to begin accepting bitcoin payments, which carry no card fraud or chargeback costs for sellers.

In the letter, MasterCard division president Eddie Grobler said digital currencies currently don't offer consumer protections such as chargebacks when a buyer pays for something that then isn't delivered, and that the value of digital currencies fluctuate so widely that they represent a consumer risk.

You further acknowledge and agree that you will remain liable for all fines, chargebacks, refunds and other expenses incurred in the enforcement of the CEA and PSA and further agree to reimburse Founding Moms for any and all such fines, chargebacks, refunds and other expenses incurred.

For example, Amherst's revised chargeback amount would decrease by approximately $ 614,000, the Town of Tonawanda's would decrease by $ 529,000, Buffalo's would be reduced by $ 475,000, and so forth.

BY MICHAEL RICONDA New City — In a unanimous decision, the county legislature's budget & finance committee approved a memorializing resolution calling on the state legislature and governor to resolve problems with the state's chargeback system for community colleges at its March 12 meeting.

It will also help to mitigate the chargebacks from community colleges in other counties that occur when an Erie County resident elects, often for good reasons, to attend some other county's college.

The current chargeback rate from Niagara County Community College, for instance, is $ 3,730 per full time student.

Although these so - called chargebacks come from community colleges throughout New York State, the big problem for those of us in the North towns has been NCCC.

Recently, Bill and I have been working together to drum up support for a brilliant idea of his to reduce community college chargebacks from other counties that add millions of dollars to our Erie County property taxes.

These chargebacks are then added to the property taxes for the city or town in which the student resides.

Having existed for more than 60 years, the chargeback fee policy is a hindrance for towns and doesn't benefit our region.

The city of Long Beach has received a similar notice requesting chargebacks for the 2004 - 2009 period and has yet to take action, city officials said.

Suffolk County has charged its towns for FIT chargebacks since 2012, said Vanessa Baird - Streeter, a spokeswoman for Suffolk Executive Steve Bellone.

Specifically, the resolution highlights the need to end chargeback fees for residents who attend a neighboring community college that lies within the same economic development region.

Locating the building downtown would do little to alleviate our chargeback dilemma, as many students from the North towns are reluctant to attend school in Buffalo for a variety of reasons.

The town is not disputing $ 702,000 that it was billed for the 2015 — 2016 school year, which adds up to a total of $ 5.2 million in chargebacks that the town has paid since 2010.

Several Rockland County officials announced last week, a five - point plan for combating one of the many fiscal problems facing Rockland, community college chargebacks.

BY MICHAEL CAHILL Several Rockland County officials announced last week, a five - point plan for combating one of the many fiscal problems facing Rockland, community college chargebacks.

According to Day's numbers, FIT accounts for 60 percent of the chargebacks paid in Rockland County.

New City — In a unanimous decision, the county legislature's budget & finance committee approved a memorializing resolution calling on the state legislature and governor to resolve problems with the state's chargeback system for community colleges at its March 12 meeting.

Rockland County Legislator Cris Carey, R - Bardonia, Stony Point Town Councilwoman Luanna Konopko, and Orangetown Councilman Paul Valentine joined Rockland County Legislator Ed Day, R - New City, as he announced the plan for lowering chargeback costs during a press conference last Wednesday afternoon, in the Allison - Parris County Office Building.

We all have a stake in his success, as chargebacks from other counties for Erie County students who attend their community colleges have been killing us for years.

Rockland County Legislator Ed Day announced Wednesday morning, a five - point plan for addressing the issue of community college chargebacks in Rockland County.

For additional information on chargeback fees or other county issues, please contact Legislator Hardwick at 858-8672 or email [email protected].