Albany County is about average for income mobility
for children in poor families.
In the first wave of # 6.2 bn cuts the Coalition has already: abolished BECTA, cut the Every Child a Reader Program, and cut the CTF even
for children in poor families.
Not exact matches
According to the Growing Gap, a study by the Canadian Centre
for Policy Alternatives, «
In 2004, the richest 10 per cent of
families raising
children earned 82 times more than the
poorest 10 per cent — almost triple the ratio of 1976, when they earned 31 times more.»
For over 50 years, regardless of the political environment or changes
in the economy, GLIDE has stood with the most vulnerable, including
poor people, those with illness, people of color, immigrants, as well as all
families and
children fleeing war and oppression.
But most the time is when
poor families can not support and
in need of Money to support the rest of
family members... it is pity but upon need should not we be surprised to see
families selling their
children or shipping them to the west
for adaptation...?!
The bishops» message called on «Congress and the administration to protect essential help
for poor families and vulnerable
children and to put the
poor first
in budget priorities.»
1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent
in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty
for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women,
children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty
for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules
for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death
for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women /
children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes
in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure
for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics
in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death
for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death
for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death
for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the
poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your
family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse
for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the
poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible
for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray
in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast
for Lent
in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns
families against each other, those that love
family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death
for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed
for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against
children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide
for your
family, you are an infidel)
Ministers cast about
for responses to displaced farm
families, to the deepening misery of the rural and urban
poor, to the epidemic use of drugs
in every strata of society, to half a million homeless
children; they seek techniques
for church growth, approaches to spiritual nurture and meaningful worship.
I think it is important to point out that this isn't just an issue
for middle class
families who care deeply about their
child's diet and are able to provide abundant healthy food choices but school menus have great impact on many, many
poor children who, through no fault of their own and often with no agency to change the situation, end up being pawns
in the lunch tray wars.
Given that
poor communication skills are strongly correlated with violent behaviour
in men, it seems likely that a father with
poor language skills will be more likely to act violently towards both his partner and his
children; or
for family interactions to be less productive and pleasant.
In experiments with families at high risk for poor child outcomes, researchers randomly assigned some mothers to receive training in responsive parenting technique
In experiments with
families at high risk
for poor child outcomes, researchers randomly assigned some mothers to receive training
in responsive parenting technique
in responsive parenting techniques.
For nearly 20 years, Geoffrey Canada has been president and CEO of Harlem Children's Zone, a nonprofit providing education and support programs for poor families in Harl
For nearly 20 years, Geoffrey Canada has been president and CEO of Harlem
Children's Zone, a nonprofit providing education and support programs
for poor families in Harl
for poor families in Harlem.
In far too many school districts, there are students who would qualify for free meals, except for the fact that their family never fills out the form, either because they forget, or they don't understand that it is important, or (more often) the child is too embarrassed to self - identify as poor in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it in at schoo
In far too many school districts, there are students who would qualify
for free meals, except
for the fact that their
family never fills out the form, either because they forget, or they don't understand that it is important, or (more often) the
child is too embarrassed to self - identify as
poor in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it in at schoo
in front of his classmates, and so he either doesn't give his parents the form or doesn't turn it
in at schoo
in at school.
Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and
family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be
poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards
for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations
Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation
in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding
in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.
But numerous obstacles can prevent
children from eating school meals: many students arrive at school too late to eat breakfast
in the cafeteria, before the school day begins.;
children may feel a stigma that school meals are just
for «
poor kids»;
children may need to pay a co-payment
for breakfast and lunch that their
families can not afford.
Investment would go into early years support, getting troubled
families «back on track», pupil premiums
for poorer children and recognition
for marriage
in the tax system, he said.
Tell them your
family and America's
poor, disabled,
children, and almost all elderly people living
in nursing homes — America's moms and dads and grandparents — can't accept devastating cuts to Medicaid to pay
for a tax cut
for this country's richest.
«As the national debate on immigration has grown stronger, including immigrants» use of many social services, some have argued that the reason
for the high
child poverty rate has mostly been due to the large number of
children in low - skilled,
poor immigrant
families,» Joo said.
A rapid voluntary reduction
in fertility rates
in the
poor countries, brought about by more access to
family planning, higher
child survival and education
for girls, could stabilize the population at around eight billion by 2050.
In Afghanistan and Pakistan today the Taliban have created thousands of madrassas, where children from poor families with no access to education can receive food and what passes for learning (but what is in fact quite the opposite
In Afghanistan and Pakistan today the Taliban have created thousands of madrassas, where
children from
poor families with no access to education can receive food and what passes
for learning (but what is
in fact quite the opposite
in fact quite the opposite).
NCCP defines a
poor household as one where incomes are below the federal poverty threshold (i.e., $ 24,036
for a
family of four with two
children in 2015).
Children of color accounted
for approximately 49 percent of all young people
in 2015, but were overrepresented among those living
in poor and low - income
families.
Families with earnings less than twice the poverty threshold are considered low income and include poor families (i.e., $ 48,072 for a family of four with two children i
Families with earnings less than twice the poverty threshold are considered low income and include
poor families (i.e., $ 48,072 for a family of four with two children i
families (i.e., $ 48,072
for a
family of four with two
children in 2015).
A
family is considered
poor if its earnings are below 100 percent of the poverty threshold (e.g., $ 24,008
for a
family of four with two
children in 2014).
If the single - parent
family structure adversely affects
children's educational outcomes, then the difference
in trends across income groups could possibly account
for more of the growing gap
in educational attainment between rich and
poor children than income inequality itself.
«From these findings, we know that naturally occurring decreases
in family income - to - needs were associated with worse developmental outcomes
for children from
poor families,» says Dearing, who coauthored the study with Kathleen McCartney, a professor at HGSE, and Beck Taylor, an economist at Baylor University.
The couple ran a school
for poor children in the village of Pelling, but the region's proximity to Tibet made it politically sensitive, and the
family returned to the United States
in 1982 after Maria's visa wasn't renewed.
Wanting to see
for himself, Mike visits his local elementary school
in Takoma Park, Maryland, where «the
children of übereducated whites» are
in the same classrooms as
poor blacks, black middle - class
families» and «
poor immigrant
children from Latin America, Ethiopia, and Eritrea.»
The GOP members get such
poor marks, Mr. Clay said
in a news release,
for «failing America's
children and working
families.»
Poor families may approach opportunities, and
in particular may secure schooling
for their
children,
in ways that diverge from many research models of educational decision making.
Tuition scholarships
for poor families are heavily oversubscribed as are charter schools
in areas where officials restrict the size and number of charter schools despite the many
families that desire to enroll their
children.
State officials have been dragging their feet
in implementing a federally mandated set of medical benefits
for children from
poor and working -
poor families, the coalition argues
in a suit filed
in U.S. District Court
in Philadelphia this month.
As a result, it has been suggested that wealthy
families who use private tutors
for this purpose should be taxed
in order to help
poorer children have access to the same help.
According to Teach
for America spokesperson Takirra Winfield, the program has three major components: discussions on the «history of inequity
in the United States»; teaching recruits to view
poor children's
families and neighborhoods as «assets» to academic achievement, not liabilities (a concept borrowed from African American educational theorists like Lisa Delpit and Gloria Ladson - Billings); and introducing corps members to classroom management tactics.
In a very large majority of cases, the data used to determine which students are from low - income families at this stage are not the same as the Census data used to identify school - age children in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEA
In a very large majority of cases, the data used to determine which students are from low - income
families at this stage are not the same as the Census data used to identify school - age
children in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEA
in poor families for purposes of calculating allocations to states and LEAs.
As Bush strategist Karl Rove explained
in his book Courage and Consequence: «When Bush said education was the civil rights struggle of our time or that the absence of an accountability system
in our schools meant black, brown,
poor, and rural
children were getting left behind, it gave listeners important information about his respect and concern
for every
family and deepened the impression that he was a different kind of Republican whom suburban voters... could be proud to support.»
Now on the 50th Anniversary of «The Negro
Family: The Case for National Action,» and in new research for Education Next, Harvard sociologist William Julius Wilson with Harvard colleagues James Quane and Jackelyn Hwang, find poor black children today are increasingly likely to grow up in family units in the inner city whose dire circumstances affect every aspect of their
Family: The Case
for National Action,» and
in new research
for Education Next, Harvard sociologist William Julius Wilson with Harvard colleagues James Quane and Jackelyn Hwang, find
poor black
children today are increasingly likely to grow up
in family units in the inner city whose dire circumstances affect every aspect of their
family units
in the inner city whose dire circumstances affect every aspect of their lives.
In 1968 Michael Katz published a revision of his Harvard doctoral thesis, The Irony of Early School Reform, arguing that public schooling had not always been as beneficial
for American
children, particularly ones from
poor families, as it had been traditionally portrayed.
But they are wanting
in terms of their external validity
for decisions about whether to expand present public programs
for four - year - olds: They are from a time when very little of today's safety net
for the
poor was
in place, when center - based care
for four - year - olds was rare and even kindergarten was not the rule, and before the wave of Hispanic immigration that transformed the demographics of early education programs
for children from low - income
families.
Because
children in poorer families are more likely to experience
poor - quality
child care, the data suggest that high - quality
child care might serve as an important early childhood intervention
for children living
in poverty.»
The proposed reforms, outside and inside schools — to reduce the test - score gap between whites and
poor minorities; to help
poor minority
families increase their income through steady work at livable wages and then their
children's test scores will improve; to establish research - proven reading programs
for every single,
poor, or minority
child; to give each kid a laptop computer — are endless and uncertain
in their outcomes.
When you are being abused or hearing about
children and parents being abused and harassed
for opting out of the unfair and discriminatory Common Core SBAC test or when you are paying more
in taxes and watching important school programs and services cut, now that thanks to our elected and appointed officials we are pissing away $ 100,000,000.00 a year forcing
children to take a test that will tell us that students from rich
families tend to do better and student from
poor families tend to do worse on standardized tests.
More importantly, the most - successful efforts to expand school choice (including Virginia Walden Ford's work
in Washington, D.C., Steve Barr's work with Latino communities
in Los Angeles, and Parent Revolution's Parent Trigger efforts), have been ones led by
poor and minority communities who explicitly made the case
for helping their own
children escape failure mills that damaged their
families for generations.
«
For the first time
in American history,
poor families are having the same conversation wealthy parents have been having, and it's starting with, «Hey, where are you sending your
child next year?
He found
in this piece of research that
children from prosperous
families in Kent (the biggest area
for selective schools
in England) are more likely to get into grammar schools and also that
in selective areas,
poorer children overall get relatively worse GCSE results than they do
in comprehensive areas.
While Coates doesn't touch on education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case
for why reformers (especially increasingly erstwhile conservatives
in the movement) must go back to embracing accountability measures and a strong federal role
in education policymaking that, along with other changes
in American society, are key to helping
children from
poor and minority households (as well as their
families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
If you want to really make a difference
in the public education of
poor children of color and their
families, you'll hold yourself accountable
for both your successes and your failures.
The consultation says while there has been much attention and support
for the very
poorest families, there is «very limited understanding» of the experiences of
children in families of «modest incomes».
In the end, the key lesson was that, in the low - income communities involved, systems - level initiatives, by themselves, could not transform poor educational, school, and health outcomes for vulnerable children and familie
In the end, the key lesson was that,
in the low - income communities involved, systems - level initiatives, by themselves, could not transform poor educational, school, and health outcomes for vulnerable children and familie
in the low - income communities involved, systems - level initiatives, by themselves, could not transform
poor educational, school, and health outcomes
for vulnerable
children and
families.
In Seattle, where one in three children is enrolled in a private or parochial school, those trapped behind are, in many cases, from families too poor to pay for private educatio
In Seattle, where one
in three children is enrolled in a private or parochial school, those trapped behind are, in many cases, from families too poor to pay for private educatio
in three
children is enrolled
in a private or parochial school, those trapped behind are, in many cases, from families too poor to pay for private educatio
in a private or parochial school, those trapped behind are,
in many cases, from families too poor to pay for private educatio
in many cases, from
families too
poor to pay
for private education.