Sentences with phrase «for claims experience»

However, JD Power gave Allstate relatively low rankings: a disappointing 2 out of 5 for overall experience and a 3 out of 5 for claims experience.

J.D. Power gives it a three out of five rating for the overall customer experience, and a four out of five for the claims experience.

It got high marks for customer service — JD Power gave it a 4 for overall experience and an outstanding 5 for claims experience — but A.M. Best only gave it an A for financial stability, the lowest rating of any of the insurers on our list.

The company received an A + + financial rating from A.M. Best, indicating a superior level of financial stability (and ability to pay out on your claims); it also received 3 out of 5 points for overall experience and 4 out of 5 points for claims experience from JD Power — plus a Very Good rating for claims process and an Excellent rating for speedy claims payment from Consumer Reports.

Not exact matches

I've never been a woman, so I can't speak from experience, but when I was younger the women I knew seemed to fear aging, which they claimed was worse for them.

I wasn't sure if the new «butterfly» mechanism, which claims to make the keyboard more stable, was going to provide for a smooth typing experience.

(PwC claims that based on the European experience, quarterly reports for Canadian banks might grow 40 % longer.)

Since Help Scout is a help desk, it would be foolish to claim that I'm approaching this without a slight brush of bias, but I promise you my stance comes from experience; specifically, seeing new founders suggest to other new founders why they think a convoluted system of Gmail filters is «okay for now.»

This is achieved with Amino's massive trove of deidentified data from patient experiences as described in the services billed and paid for in 9 billion commercial and Medicare insurance claims.

[4] Most worrisome is the warning of Janwillem Acket, chief economist for Julius Baer Group Ltd. (BAER), who claims that Switzerland could experience its own version of the subprime borrowing crisis, saying, «People who shouldn't be borrowing are now seriously considering entering the housing market.»

According to the complaint, Chahal lured investors by falsely claiming to be an experienced and successful trader who could generate above - market returns for clients through a low - risk trading strategy.

For Google, it's a win - win — they can claim a more relevant experience for searchers and a higher ROI for advertisers — a better product overall for everyoFor Google, it's a win - win — they can claim a more relevant experience for searchers and a higher ROI for advertisers — a better product overall for everyofor searchers and a higher ROI for advertisers — a better product overall for everyofor advertisers — a better product overall for everyofor everyone.

To support the same, the AvaTrade trading platform offers excellent claims about the trading company aiming towards the creation of some user - centered trading experience for the traders of the company.

The founders claim they have 100 years of experience in the markets, which leads you to think that you are in good hands for trading binary options with Banc De Binary (BBinary)

Genesis 1:1... «in the beginning, God...» John 3:16... «For God so loved... «I'm Blind, but now I see...» your personal experience confirms nothing... the patients on the psych unit of my hospital are filled with some amazing claims... just as the Muslim, the Jew, the Buddhist, the Rastafarian make claims of their experience...

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

Given that people can be deluded or more often, allow their desire to believe something destroy their objectivity to the point their conclusions aren't reliable, your claims about private, personal experiences no one outside your head can verify simply aren't enough for anyone but you.

If, as the Scriptures and experience tell us, all men are by nature in a state of guilt and depravity from which they are wholly unable to deliver themselves and have no claim whatever on God for deliverance, it follows that if any are saved God must choose out those who shall be the objects of His grace (Boettner, Predestination, 95).

And I have sought to show, using Hartshorne as a concrete example, how a dialectical defense provides the ultimate support for one's claims about experience and its essential temporality and how that dialectic rests on claims quite remote from any direct or straightforward reading of experience, whether private or public.

For, after all, at the heart of the process philosopher's constructive metaphysics and theology is the claim that having temporal antecedents is essential to experience.

The claim of privileged access is not saved by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.

Webb sneaks up on a justification for a gospel of wealth; claims that the poor providentially provide an occasion for the wealthy to show charity; discounts pluralism (though with qualification); and fails to attend to the black experience in the American story or to consider the thought of Martin Luther King, who held to a view of providential American exceptionalism yet was critical of military adventurism.

Julie - I was especially encouraged and thought of you while reading a particular passage because it is about the story of a woman who was assaulted and not believed... and then about the way that it was necessary for there to be a public forum where she could claim and own her experience.

Science clearly disproves some aspects of the bible, and some takes on evolution but the bible never claimed to be a «scientific proof for the existence of God» it was meant as a blueprint for how to live so that you may experience God directly.

Thus it acknowledges with the apophatic tradition that we really do not know the inner being of divine reality; the hints and clues we have of the way things are, whether we call them religious experiences, revelation, or whatever, are too fragile, too little (and often too negative) for heavy metaphysical claims.

The Christian, the Jew, and the Muslim, for example, each claims universality for his religion, but none of them in defining his faith points clearly and unambiguously to basic experiences which all human beings will acknowledge.

However, Whitehead uses the experience of CE as evidenced for an objective claim, so it seems as if he is making an objective claim about it, and hence it could be erroneous, since there could be a difference between «seems» and «is.»

In spite of the fact that Hartshorne universally posits a strong sense of relativity to account for omniscience (as well as for other reasons), I will argue that even Hartshorne is forced in important specific cases to attenuate his claims for a strong interpretation of divine relativity; one that says God feels in exactitude the experience of others.

This bond between world and occasion, Whitehead immediately admits, is a «baffling antithetical relation»; but for him, when we examine our everyday experience of the world, or when we inquire into the presuppositions of common practice, or into the presuppositions of the natural sciences, or into the presuppositions of basic epistemic claims, we run again and again into this paradoxical relation of mutual immanence (MT 218f).

And this conclusion can not be avoided by claiming that the experiencing subject would not include other subjects contemporary with it; for Whitehead explicitly asserts that any two mutually contemporary occasions are also (in a sense not involving causal objectification) mutually immanent (AI 278, 254; PR 91; SMW 106f).

They will claim the biblical word for themselves, in the experience of hoping and believing in the Gospel, of trusting in one's own conscience, even in the face of opposition....

Such groups have claimed that federal hate crimes laws will silence preachers, ignoring those laws» robust protections for free speech and religious expression, as well as the experience in the many states with such protections already in place.

The «experience of having a cat perception of a suitable sort» — exactly because it is a cognitively significant experience — at once and concurrently constitutes the cause of X's claiming that «The cat is on the mat» and affords X with a reason for making this claim.

Where I would previously have been inclined to agree with Whitehead's characterization of Bergson that the intellect cart only grasp by spatializing, I now think (and have argued above) that I had failed to recognize fully the implications of the claim I had argued for in 1993 — that if there can be no intuition without intellect, and if intuition can grasp intelligible things without spatializing, then there is a sense in which the intellect, insofar as it is manifest in intuitive operations of consciousness, can grasp experience without spatializing it.

For that matter W.E.B. DuBois wrote of the distinctive sublimity of the «negro» spiritual, and he claims that only through the experience of slavery could such spiritual strivings come to the fore..

Such experiences themselves are evidence for the further claim that there are more subjective aesthetic reponses than those which can be called propositional feelings.

This account of awareness is empirical because it is based on the immediate experience of the causal efficacy of the physical world; it is radically empirical because it claims to sense, in addition to the data for the five senses, the objective embodiments of values, and it senses these values «intuitively» — that is, physically by, for example, a sense of aversion or a sense of attraction.

This puts Hartshorne where he wants to be, because to intuit (prehend) actual occasions as they occur is to intuit (prehend) them formaliter, as they exist in the immediate subjectivity of concrescence, and since God is everlasting, and experiences all actual occasions formaliter, actual occasions are preserved everlastingly (in their full, warm, subjective immediacy) in the consequent nature of God.6 This interpretation resolves the question of the status of the past, the problem of how the past is given as datum for concrescing actual occasions, and the question of a ground for truth claims about the past.

(The Jews can not be responsible without experiencing from the side of the Arabs what it means for the Jews to have settled in Palestine, but neither can they give up their own claim.

Heideggerians (and some Hegelians) would claim this is also a phenomenological question, but I reserve the term «phenomenology» for the narrower activity of the study of the givenness of experience to consciousness.

Language's claim to present inner experience and describe how reality is corresponds to our desire for some ultimate «word» or «reality» in which to ground all experience.

Northrop observed such a confluence, and held that Whitehead and Berg - son differed only on one major point of doctrine: he alleges that, for Bergson, spatialization in science constitutes a falsification of experience, while he thinks this is not the case for Whitehead.30 There are two problems with this claim by Northrop.

For all of the authors a time came when they tested their own experience against their religion's claims.

This connection — between the experience of the burning bush, the struggle for liberation, and the glimpses of a promised land — sheds light on Jesus» stark claims.

The very logic of a paradigmatic happening pushes us in that direction, for such a happening embodies the claim to illumine the totality of experience.

By claiming the male experience to be normative for faith, and by naming the deity as male, we have overemphasized strength and aggressiveness and denied — indeed, repressed — many expressions of faith that focus on God's self - giving, self - emptying love.

For example, Whitehead wants to claim that the things which we experience have an «insistent particularity» of their own:

It is here that we must look for support for our claim that Whitehead can legitimately say that we experience other individuals.

For several decades the strict separationists have had it all their way with the public schools; both the Alabama case and the Tennessee case are signs of a counteroffensive by parents for whom religion is a central part of that experience to which schools claim to do justiFor several decades the strict separationists have had it all their way with the public schools; both the Alabama case and the Tennessee case are signs of a counteroffensive by parents for whom religion is a central part of that experience to which schools claim to do justifor whom religion is a central part of that experience to which schools claim to do justice.

Although theologians may have claimed that crucifixion scenes exhibited the extremity of God's love for humans, it was scenes of the child suckling at the breast that spoke to people on the basis of their earliest experience.