Sentences with phrase «for construction litigation»

Technology Park Corp. on Monday, March 5, 2017 — a case with significant implications for construction litigation.

An exciting opportunity for a Construction Litigation Solicitor to join a friendly and highly established team in our client's Bristol based office.

For example, you're not going to need the same information or event deadlines for a construction litigation matter as you will for an underinsured motorist arbitration.

He is listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Construction Litigation and Professional Malpractice Defense.

Named «Best Lawyers» 2018 «Oklahoma City Lawyers of the Year» were Timothy J. Bomhoff for product liability litigation defense, W. Chris Coleman for both securities regulation and venture capital law, Robert W. Dace for mass tort litigation / class actions defense, Elizabeth L. Dalton for franchise law, Spencer W. Haines for closely held companies and family businesses law, Henry D. Hoss for construction litigation, and Susan B. Shields for tax litigation and controversy.

Among her many legal achievements, Ms. Ferguson has been named to Florida Trend Magazine's Legal Elite in 2014 and 2015, and has been selected to the Florida Super Lawyers Rising Stars List for Construction Litigation since 2009.

Attorneys for construction litigation claims involving poor or defective construction, garage or building collapses involving injury and wrongful death.

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; delays in the completion of project sales; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 20, 2016.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; cancelation of utility - scale feed - in - tariff contracts in Japan; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

In a short video that has gone viral on social media, the Deputy Majority Leader insisted that she contacted people she knew at the World Bank to fund the construction of the project after assuring the Bretton Wood institution that she could secure them a litigation - free land for the school project.

Characterizing its practice as a «general practice for a specialized clientele,» the firm provides legal advice and expertise to handle any and all needs of a school district, including fair dismissal personnel issues, allegations of employment discrimination and EEOC complaints, other personnel disputes, student discipline issues, student tribunal hearings, civil rights claims, personal injury actions, federal and state constitutional claims and other litigation, special education and other legal issues involving disabled students, contracts, leases and other business needs, policy and rule development, construction disputes, bond and SPLOST issues and other financial matters.

Providing a general law practice for a specialized clientele, Harben, Hartley & Hawkins meets all of the legal needs of school districts including: fair dismissal personnel issues, allegations of employment discrimination and EEOC complaints, other personnel disputes, student discipline issues, student tribunal hearings, civil rights claims, personal injury actions, federal and state constitutional claims and other litigation, special education and other legal issues involving disabled students, contracts, leases and other business needs, policy and rule development, construction disputes, bond and SPLOST issues and other financial matters.

• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and Federal Employment Law • School Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative Law & Appeals of State and Federal Agency Decisions and Actions • Special Investigations & Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School Board Training • Litigation in Federal and State Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals Before State and Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting • Construction Law, AIA Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special Education under IDEA and Section 504 • Student Rights & Discipline Issues and Hearings • State and Federal Claims of Discrimination • State and Federal Civil Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for Local Government Entities

I worked several years as an inspector for an engineering firm specializing in construction defect litigation support.

Jerry is qualified in the California Supreme Court as an expert witness in the standard of care for California home inspectors, residential construction defects and landlord / tenant litigation.

DOE also claims 6 years lead time for nuclear; at a round table discussion with utility CEOs (from a business site I didn't bookmark and cant find), one of them said jestingly that a new nuclear plant takes 15 years — 5 for design & permitting, 5 for litigation, and 5 for construction.

A formula can not be given, at least insofar as I can tell, for how to do this and I still face the problem from the most mundane (our firm has a forensics service line where we'll provide expert witness testimony with respect to construction defect litigation and the opposing side has their experts as well) to the most impactful (climate disruption), to the most woo infested (ESP, UFOs, «free energy,» etc.), to the politically pragmatic (do guns really prevent crime?).

«You always have your battles and your disputes, but for the most part, there is a high respect for each other,» says Chiasson, whose practice focuses on commercial, construction and insurance litigation.

The lawyers of Robson Carpenter write a group blog, the Condo Development Blog, and Adam Zasada authors the Ontario Construction Law and Litigation Blog, which won a Clawbie for Best New Law Blog in 2012.

In addition, he is listed in The Best Lawyers in America © in the area of Litigation - Construction for 2017 and 2018.

We have represented many education institutions for many years in a vast variety of civil litigation matters, including contract disputes, construction disputes, building envelope and environmental separation concerns, maintenance of capital structures, labour issues, defamation, judicial review, and providing defence to educators.

The collapse of construction and services giant Carillion is set to keep dozens of lawyers across practices ranging from restructuring, to litigation and employment busy for years to come, according to partners.

Patent litigation, including managing electronic discovery efforts, working with expert witnesses to draft invalidity and non-infringement reports, drafting claim construction briefs and motions for summary judgment, and pre-trial preparations.

The 2018 rankings also included five Salt Lake City - based attorneys as «Lawyer of the Year:» N. Todd Leishman for his work in Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Brad R. Cahoon for his Government Relations Practice; P. Christian Anderson in Corporate Governance Law; James D. Gilson for his work in Litigation — Construction; and Paul M. Durham for Litigation — Real Estate.

For experienced representation in a construction litigation case or a contractual disagreement, please call a Reno construction defense lawyer with the Laxalt & Nomura, LTD law firm in Nevada.

Last year, Hadef & Partners won Property & Construction Team of the Year 2013 and the Dispute Resolution department took home the award for Litigation & Dispute Resolution Team of the Year in 2012.

The categories that we were short - listed for this year were: · Property and Construction Team of the Year; and · Litigation and Dispute Resolution Team of the Year This year's official awards ceremony was held at The Westin Mina Seyahi, in Dubai on 15 May 2014 and although we did not win awards this time around, it was a privilege to be shortlisted for our role in some of the region's most prestigious work.

Listed in The Best Lawyers in America © in the area of Commercial Litigation in 2018 and Litigation - Construction for 2017 and 2018

Our San Diego - based construction litigation lawyers are highly regarded in the legal community for their ethical and zealous representation.

Twelve Jennings Haug Cunningham Partners Recognized as 2018 Best Lawyers in America (August 22, 2017) Jennings Haug Cunningham is pleased to announce that twelve of the firm's partners were named to The Best Lawyers in America ® 2018 list, a peer - review ranking publication for the legal profession, in the areas of construction law and litigation, environmental law and litigation, insurance law, personal injury, arbitration and mediation.

The firm has built a long - standing collaboration with premier construction companies in Japan, playing a key role in Japan - Taiwan joint venture consultation and representation of related claims, arbitrations, and litigations, notably for cases involving the high - speed railway and rapid transit system.

In the Best Law Firms survey, Thompson Hine is ranked a top firm nationally for Admiralty & Maritime Law; Antitrust Law; Commercial Litigation; Construction Law; Corporate Law; Litigation - Intellectual Property; Litigation - Banking & Finance; Litigation - Real Estate; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Mergers & Acquisitions Law; Private Equity Law; Transportation Law; and Venture Capital Law.

Johnston is also advising a construction company in a claim against a solicitor relating to negligent advice regarding a Part 36 offer and cost consequences given to the client following litigation, and Hall is handling a claim against solicitors for negligence and a breach of fiduciary duty relating to a property transaction.

With the rare experience of helping entertainment companies plan and orchestrate concerts and festivals across the U.S. and around the globe, John built the model for a practice group that caters to live music festivals and similar events, with a «soup to nuts» suite of legal services spanning complicated personal injury litigation, construction, bid protests, breach of contract, Dram Shop laws, employment, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and more.

Acting for the Receivers of a Singapore company in litigation in the UK, arising from a Pakistani construction project and related LCIA arbitration proceedings;

Omone Foy - Yamah, a partner at Lagos - based Punuka Attorneys & Solicitors, agrees with Ajibade and says the resolution of such disputes by ADR often results in the preservation of business relationships which in turn increases business opportunities for Nigeria: «The oil and gas, maritime, construction and infrastructure sectors largely benefit from the use of ADR because they involve huge capital investments and risk huge financial losses if trapped in protracted litigation,» she says.

Schiff Hardin is recognized for its strong litigation and transactional work and its cutting - edge intellectual property, environmental, and construction practices.

For building department issue reviews, responses, or disputes, contact ADLI Law Group for the assistance of a leading construction attorney that has endless experience with all construction law and litigatiFor building department issue reviews, responses, or disputes, contact ADLI Law Group for the assistance of a leading construction attorney that has endless experience with all construction law and litigatifor the assistance of a leading construction attorney that has endless experience with all construction law and litigation.

Mr. McShane has defended public contractors in bid protest actions and construction defect litigation, pursued commercial code and contract remedies for financial institutions and corporations, prosecuted and defended legal malpractice cases and protected lenders» interests in bankruptcy estates and civil forfeiture cases.

I suspect that an ideal focus would be on such fields as, for example, international trade and transport, international commercial contracts, litigation and arbitration, banking, finance and accounting, corporate, commercial and business matters, takeovers and mergers, communications, technology and intellectual property, international construction and property and international and offshore tax strategy.

The appointment will see the trio cover real estate work including construction, planning and litigation for Standard Life for a three - year period running from 1 January this year.

The firm's areas of practice include: advising the multinational and multi-jurisdictional employer; Industrial Relations Board proceedings; collective agreements and bargaining; compensation and benefits plans; construction labour relations; employee relations; executive employment agreements and compensation; grievance arbitration; human rights and accommodation; injunctive court proceedings and judicial review; interest arbitration; Labour Relations Board proceedings; management training; mediation and alternative dispute resolution; occupational health and safety; outsourcing; pay equity; privacy; responding to union organizing and applications for certification sale or closure; strike or lock - out preparation and business continuity planning; workplace investigations; workplace safety and insurance; wrongful and constructive dismissal litigation.

Kim Lough is being recognized by Southwest Super Lawyers for his experience in construction litigation.

Ryan's recent litigation success includes the following verdicts and settlements: a settlement in the case of D.L. v. HMS Construction, Inc. et al. for $ 21.5 million; a jury verdict in the case of Rittger v.

The firm garnered national first tier rankings for antitrust law, commercial litigation, construction law, corporate law, employee benefits (ERISA) law, insurance law, litigation - antitrust, litigation - construction, litigation - ERISA, litigation - intellectual property, Native American law, patent law, real estate law, technology law, and trademark law in US News — Best Lawyers ® 2017 «Best Law Firms.»

The firm's 23 attorneys focus in areas of insurance defense, financial institution litigation, environmental law, construction and contract litigation, surety and fidelity law, lawyer and professional liability, complex civil litigation, personal injury, employment, family law and domestic relations, probate and estate planning, and municipal risk litigation for businesses and individuals.

He has handled private and public sector construction transactions and claims litigation for local and national owners, developers, designers, CMs and contractors since 1974.

Jon has experience in the drafting and negotiation of construction agreements, procurement matters, tendering issues, construction insurance issues and builders» liens as well as providing advocacy services for mediations, arbitrations, regulatory proceedings and litigation.