Sentences with phrase «for copyrighted works»

It can be very difficult to trace the ownership chain for copyrighted works (especially with multiple authors, e.g. sound + video + text).

It is used by copyright title searchers who are attempting to clear a chain of title for copyrighted works.

Posted by Michael Capobianco for Writer BewareThe U. S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently held a public meeting on «Facilitating the Development of the Online Licensing Environment for Copyrighted Works.»

Continue reading Finding Authors: The Importance of Establishing an Online Licensing System for Copyrighted Works

If the available range of expression for a copyrighted work is small, then copyright protection for the work is «thin» and proving infringement requires a showing of virtually identical copying.

You can use a Copyright Assignment for any copyrighted work, whether it's a written text, a source code, a movie, an image, or an audio recording.

Not exact matches

Copyright protection is created the moment your work is fixed in a «tangible form of expression» (paper copy, CD, disk, videotaped performance, and the like) for the first time.

If that doesn't work, you can engage in SEO sabotage: purchasing links to the offending website that appear on a site that's already in the search engine's doghouse for violations such as keyword stuffing, machine - generated pages, or copyright violation.

Here are some of the most common: Copyright / Trademark: According to the United States Copyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressioCopyright / Trademark: According to the United States Copyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressioCopyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressiocopyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression.»

She worked at Yahoo for more than a decade, fighting off a copyright infringement suit from Sony BMG, helping the company navigate issues of online privacy and working on deals like a Microsoft search agreement (which was just revised this year).

Lucas took the designer to court for copyright infringement, but the court ruled the replicas were not covered by copyright law because they are not works of art.

Much as it is possible for someone to get rewarded for performing a work — as opposed to writing it, which involves copyright — publishers would get to command fees for the stuff their writers write, based their own (new) rights rather than the copyright held by the journalist.

The lecture draws on some of my work for CIGI (NAFTA, Innovation) and makes the case that NAFTA negotiations are a problematic place for digital copyright reform, noting the lack of transparency, lost flexibility, and inability to strike a critical policy balance.

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

Changes to copyright law in 1998 greatly extended the rights of authors and, as a result, few works entered the public domain in the United States for two decades.

While some rights holders have argued that the standard for a substantial is very low (the National Post recently argued in a case that «even the reproduction of a small number of words in a newspaper article can be an impermissible reproduction»), the Copyright Board says that its preliminary view is that «copying of a few pages or a small percentage from a book that is not a collection of short works, such as poems, is not substantial.»

Zuckerberg is called before Harvard's administrative board for violations of both privacy and copyright, but survives — and gets to work on a social network for his fellow Harvardians.

In January, the troubled US photography firm saw its stock price jump 44 % after it announced the launch of KodakCoin, a cryptocurrency designed to work with its new blockchain - based copyright platform for photographers, KodakOne.

Hunting people down for copyright violations is a waste of time that could be better spent supporting the work done by enthusiastic Catholics free of charge for the love of God.

Since the works are long out of copyright, they are freely available in various electronic formats, including ones suitable for ebook readers, or can be read online at the Project Gutenberg webste at Gutenberg.org.

You can use copyright material without the owner's permission, as long as it is for review or criticism and «a significant acknowledgment of the work is made.»

If you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Website in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner's behalf.

One of the things that got to us the most was reading «This is MY recipe for XXX» on her site... And even though I don't believe anyone can copyright a recipe, this is OUR work.

Except for downloading one copy of the Materials on any single computer for your personal, non-commercial home use, you must not reproduce, modify, copy, publish, transmit, prepare derivative works based upon, distribute, perform or display the Materials without first obtaining the written permission of the Action Network Group and, if applicable, any other copyright owner.

Except as expressly authorized by us, you agree not to modify, rent, distribute, lease, loan, sell or exploit for any commercial purpose any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service, and not to create derivative works based on the Service, in whole or in part for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices.

If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide MomsTeam's Agent for Notice of claims of copyright or other intellectual property infringement («Agent») the written information specified below: (1) An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (2) A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed upon, or if multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.

And, of course, there's #folksyhour on Twitter every Tuesday, which many of us join for discussions on topics that affect us and our work — from how to keep your work original to practical topics like copyright and how to collaboration can help your business.

Examples of copyright works are artworks, textile designs, wallpaper prints, cards, most jewellery and always text that you create, whether for things like bucket lists or text for your website.

If you believe in good faith that your copyrighted work has been reproduced on our website without authorization in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact our Vice President for Operations at the address provided below with the following information:

By submitting content to this Mead Johnson Nutrition website, you automatically grant Mead Johnson Nutrition, or warrant that the owner of such content has expressly granted Mead Johnson Nutrition, the royalty - free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, and distribute the content (in whole or in part) worldwide and / or to incorporate it into other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed, for the full term of any copyright that may exist in such content.

Privacy Policy Copyright Notice Taunton Guarantee User Agreement About Us Work for Us Advertise Customer Service

In 2012, ORG won Liberty's Human Rights Campaigner of Year award alongside 38 Degrees, for work on issues from copyright to the Snooper's Charter.

They could make more of their catalogue available and support simplification of licensing, such as provision for licensing of orphan works and making it easier for more deals to be struck through a Digital Copyright Exchange.

And we need effective copyright protection that works for the digital age.

First, it's a piece of music intended to make a political point about a modern conflict, one inherent in the nature of networked digital communications — authors and copyright holders have long profited from creative works by charging to distribute them, but in a digital world, books, music and movies can be made in unlimited copies and shared essentially for free.

I am against extension of copyright protection terms and software patents, I support declaring not published for a long time works a public domain.

Thus the difficult point was to weigh the interests of copyright owners, who occasionally spend hundreds of millions (as in the case of Hollywood movies) to create their works, and who have a right for setting the price of the products of these investments as well as a legal right that that right is enforced by the state.

All text, graphics, audio files, java applets and scripts, downloadable software, and other works on the web site are the copyrighted works of Molinaro For Dutchess.

Mr Weatherley has previously worked as vice-president for Europe at the Motion Picture Licensing Company, which enforces copyright for the film industry, and as financial controller of the Pete Waterman Group, the entertainment company behind singers such as Kylie Minogue.»

4.2.9 Practice Inter Library Loan (ILL) of articles or components of the Licensed Materials for noncommercial use in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC 108, «limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives») and clause 3 for the Guidelines for Proviso of Subsection 108 (g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted works.

They claim that, according to U.S. copyright law, the Neuron manuscript is a «work made for hire,» which the law defines as «a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.»

As defined by Brown University in its copyright policy, however, «[c] opyrightable works of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rWorks Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.»

Subscription - based music download services such as this depend on the copyright owner giving permission for their work to be distributed in this way.

This popularization of the automation process calls for a comprehensive legal framework that ensures a creator's economic and moral rights with regards to his work — copyright protection.

The risk, in both cases, is that artists will be less willing to publish their own works, for fear of infringement of DNN copyright protections.

Additionally, a small number of national copyright laws confers attribution to what UK legislation defines loosely as «the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken.»

If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please follow our Notice and Procedures for Making Claims of Copyright Infringemecopyright infringement, please follow our Notice and Procedures for Making Claims of Copyright InfringemeCopyright Infringement below.

It seems to me you've got a prior claim with your books and educational courses, no matter if you've never sued for infringement before, with the new copyright laws, your copyrights (even unpublished works) last about 140 years.

And this particular work — it was authored in 1823; any work authored prior to 1923 is available as «fair use» to the public (free to use without permission); even according to current copyright laws and as for any work, copyright expiration occurs 70 years after the author's death — in this case the author died in 1863, meaning his copyright would have expired (if applying current laws) in 1933.

«Senior Dating Service, Mature Singles & Over 50s Online Dating» - it's the title of the site.The most important text on the main page - «Dating in UK», «Search Local Mature Singles», «Search through the latest singles near you...», «Quotes From Some Happy Members...», «finding love with senior dating making older dating work online over 50 dating on the internet online dating for seniors»,» © Copyright Online Senior Dates 2012 Home Contact Us FAQs News Privacy».