Sentences with phrase «for counter attacking football»

Theo isn't 1st choice CF, Giroud fights to win the ball back and I believe Theo needs to learn that but he does offer a great «Plan B» during a game, if Giroud can't do the job or we want to hold a lead then play deeper with faster strikers for counter attacking football instead of so much possession bassed.

he has pace for counter attacking football.

Facts remains with Santi, Ozil, Sanchez and potentially Mayrez, Lacazette, a well built striker for counter attacking football will excel.

Cech Bellerin Mustafi Koscielny Monreal Cazorla Xhaka Ox Ozil Alexis Perez Giroud is too slow for counter attacking football...

Not exact matches

I hate to agree with you but LCFC could very well be an ideal team for Theo, good counter attacking football and if Theo finds his form in a system like that...

If they are going to play an attacking football against Arsenal, that is good and what we want it to get an open space for our counter attacking play.

Recently he have excelled playing for teams which does not dominate the ball or less possession who plays counter attacking style football.

We continue to try to pass through opponents playing for an idea of great Barcelona-esque football, when we don't have the players for it and our best successes come when we play counter attacking football.

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

He's also known for his fluid passing game and quick counter attacking football style.

While armchair managing is all fun and good... Why on earth would you want us to play a new system for a game this big!?!? I get fans fondness for the 4 -4-2 while seeing the very entertaining football teams like Leicester and Atletico play with scything counter attacks... But this is Arsenal playing Chelsea at home after they've had a couple of disappointing results.

I knew Sundays result before we played and if you look at the team Wenger has no tactics if you are going play subs why 5/10 mins before the end it seems he is always looking for excuses and Miracles not playing basic football protect you lead and if they come at you you can counter attack.

Look Per is a decent defender, but Arsenal plays attacking football, that means we get caught on counter attacks quite a bit, we either need two fast defenders like Kos or we need a fast and strong DM to cover for the back two.

Mourinho is boring for a WHOLE different reason than that he plays counter attacking football.

Kante would be top class but Leicester plays a lot of counter attacking football which is perfect for his style of play.

but for the 0 — 70 minutes he was waste of counter attacks member or fast flowing football that could cause havoc to the opposition..

Prandelli's team could be set up perfectly for tournament football with their solid defence and counter attacking style of play.

Some may point to the fact that Chelsea only had 3 but if you assess the situation, Chelsea were never going to come out guns blazing at Arsenal, Chelsea thrive on controlling the game and counter attacks, having a free flowing game of attacking football is in Arsenal's best interest not Chelsea's and as such they would do everything to break up the play, seek for one off opportunities to get a goal and or get goals from set pieces and it worked like a charm against us.

Not only that, the prof also praised his rival manager Claudio Ranieri and revealed that the Gunners would be trying to employ the same sort of possession based football that has been our trademark under Wenger4 for years, even though he was well aware of the threat that the Foxes possess with their pace and ability to hit teams with their counter attacking style.

2) Invitation to attack us — Arsenal football philosophy had quietly shifted and now we were inviting opponents to come and attack us as they would see we were not operating in full attack gears and it was easy for them to get into our defending side of the pitch much quicker as they countered lesser bodies on the way.

He's another very direct player and unless it's one of those few times we play counter attacking football our passing game may not be suited for him all the time.

The main problem for me is our tactics; central midfielders occupying wing positions with wingers on the bench, no runners ever in behind the opposition defence, passing football with no end product, nobody driving forward at pace with the ball, instead opting for a sideways or backwards pass and an overall lack of counter attacking, penetrating play.

The last 2 years he should have not come off the pitch for anyone unless we are playing strictly counter attack football, which is maybe 5 % of the time.

Do nt get carried away gooners Arsene Wenger did create the Invincibles, he does know what hes doing so teaching an old dog new tricks has nothing to do with it, but im gonna say he never had the money or right players for this type of counter attacking football and times even in fabregas era we saw flashes of brilliance that Arsenal have based that around the philosiphy of the club and maybe just maybe its finially coming to fruition and every player / coach has bought into it.

Played counter attacking football for the most part.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

A football coach would be great / WR coach in training for runs, and CB coach would be greta for our defenders b / c they specialize in understand how opposition attackers will run to attack the goal and what spaces to exploit, and how to counter / manipulate / trick others.

He is suited for that type of football where you can trick the defense with random long balls or lightning counter attacks etc..

haha you have to say it was decent counter attacking football for our first time in god knows how long

Ramsey has the qualities needed for the modern box to box were as wilshere doesn't really he is ok over a short distance with a short burst but beyond that he is quite static in the middle, but is excellent technically and can play a quick pass when he is on form use him as a springboard to launch counter attacks from any new manager that comes in will either help him improve or he will be a casualty of the new regime, unfortunately that reality of life in football i hope for one both of them stay and help us win trophies in years to come COYG

By virtue of their fluid passing and strong attacking mentality football, this is a position that is vital for the Reds as more than often it is the defending midfielder who is in way of a strong counter attack.

Jose's unpredictable counter attacking football makes it hard for teams to plan accordingly to stop his team.

You can't play counter attacking football against WBA at home because they will never attack in enough numbers for us to be able to.