TAGS: Legal informatics conferences; Legislative information systems; Legislative drafting systems; Legal XML; XML for legislation; Legislative XML; AKOMA NTOSO; XML for case law; XML for court decisions; XML
for court opinions; Court records information systems; Judicial information systems.
Both have the good sense to use the font Century
for court opinions.
From within the Tabulaw site, you can search
for a court opinion.
Not exact matches
Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia has not yet issued an
opinion on the case.
«I think United is likely to be found on legally solid ground, but has already lost in the
court of public
opinion, and will pay dearly
for it,» Quinn said according to Reuters, noting that Dao could still get a substantial settlement from the airline.
But Ginsburg added: «The
Court expressed no
opinion on whether the honest - services instructional error was ultimately harmless, but leaves that matter
for consideration on remand.»
«There is no good cause
for further judicial involvement where the
court has now heard directly from Redstone that he has lost trust in Herzer, does not want her in his life and instead wants his daughter Shari to look after him as necessary,» the judge wrote in an
opinion this morning.
The ruling marks the second time the high
court has rendered an
opinion in the case, in which the state is seeking to hold Greenberg accountable
for sham transactions at the insurer.
The
opinion, issued by the U.S.
Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit, strikes down a legislative provision, first enacted in 1986 and renewed numerous times since, which sets a goal that 5 percent of federal defense contracting dollars each fiscal year must be awarded to certain entities, including small disadvantaged companies.
So here's a way
for the Dreamers to be protected, President Trump to be responsive to public
opinion and
for the Department of Justice to devote its resources to better causes (like keeping AR - 15s out of the hands of crazy people)-- end the appeals and allow the
court rulings to stand.
Once again, it's curious that Trump's former lawyer would disclose this — but it creates an opportunity
for Trump's current team to push back in the
court of public
opinion, trying to either force Mueller to agree to a limited interview, or else to wage a political war by trying to refuse.
The legal basis
for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in Justice Douglas classic
opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut.5 In the Griswold case, the United States Supreme
Court struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraception.
«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in claims II and IV, the
Court grants defendants» motion
for summary judgment on those claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his
opinion.
And even if Canadian
courts ultimately deem such probing too onerous within the rubric of «reasonableness» review, such details can provide fodder
for public commentary that can undermine the government's position in the
court of public
opinion (regarding the economic case
for increased oil sands production,
for example, see University of Alberta Professor Andrew Leach's commentary here).
Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax
opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify
for tax - free treatment
for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a
court would not sustain such a challenge.
The legislation was stalled and the Conservative have since asked the Supreme
Court of Canada
for its
opinion on the Senate reform proposals.
Competitions
for factories or stadiums are typically more private, but this one is playing out in the
court of public
opinion, said Lauren Hitt, who is managing the public side of the campaign
for Philadelphia.
To try and re-elect an Alabama Supreme
Court Chief Justice who has proven in the past that he thinks his
opinion is above the laws of the state and has already been removed from the office once
for his actions is disgraceful.
In the majority
opinion, Justice william o. douglas, writing
for the
Court, rejected the notion that the judiciary is obligated to enforce only those rights that are expressly enumerated in the Consti - tution.
What that suggests about the U.S.
Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit, I do not know, but its March 6
opinion in Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington turned precisely on the point that abortion and assisted suicide share a common rationale.
Can you tell from the
Court's
opinion how much integration of faith and learning is enough to establish a ministerial exception
for faculty?
For example, a couple of years ago he wrote an opinion for the Court validating Colorado's so - called «bubble law,» which requires protestors to stay eight feet from any person approaching a health care facili
For example, a couple of years ago he wrote an
opinion for the Court validating Colorado's so - called «bubble law,» which requires protestors to stay eight feet from any person approaching a health care facili
for the
Court validating Colorado's so - called «bubble law,» which requires protestors to stay eight feet from any person approaching a health care facility.
At almost the same time that he wrote the
opinion sustaining the «bubble law,» Justice Stevens issued another
opinion for the
Court, this one invalidating a high school policy that permitted student - led prayer before football games.
«I think collectively the Vatican feels it has taken a drubbing in the
court of public
opinion, and it's looking
for a media - savvy expert that can turn the ship around,» Allen said.
Even before Yigal Amir was sentenced to life imprisonment
for the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, a related trial had already been concluded in the
court of public
opinion.
«Mr. Jeffs, although presumed innocent, has now been incarcerated
for more than four years on charges that, given the [Utah] supreme
court's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this m
court's
opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible
for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District
Court earlier this m
Court earlier this month.
Against this background readers may perceive the cruel irony in Justice Brennan's
opinion for the Supreme
Court majority, holding the Louisiana «balanced treatment» statute unconstitutional because the creationists who promoted it had a «religious purpose.»
Example one: Justice Powell's
opinion for the
Court in....
clearly the Gay Gestapo is working overtime... they pulled out because they do nt want to be bullied in the
court of public
opinion and abused by the Gestapo lawyers... I personally have no respect
for, sympathy
for or interest in the Gay issues..
The
court is ahead of public
opinion for some Americans, but not ahead of most Americans.
The Stenberg dissenters repeatedly cited and quoted Justice O'Connor's abortion
opinions from the 1980s, in which she had criticized the
Court for operating as «the nation's ex officio medical board with powers to approve or disapprove medical and operative practices and standards throughout the United States.»
This was has so much hatred
for a religious symbol that not only symbolizes Christianity but it is also a huge part of Italian culture that she would go as far as taking the matter to
court... why is her
opinion, her feelings more important than the
opinion and feelings of the rest of the Italian population?
While the case was decided 5 — 4, the
opinions that accompanied the
court's decision also signal that seven of the nine justices agree that businesses can make religious liberty claims in
court — an important ruling, said Joshua Hawley, senior counsel
for The Becket Fund
for Religious Liberty.
As Scalia's dissent makes clear, the majority
opinion in Lawrence epitomizes everything that is wrong with the contemporary
Court» its arbitrariness, its contempt
for democratic governance, its constant readiness to fashion new constitutional rights out of whole cloth.
Moreover, in holding that a statute prohibiting aliens from being imported
for labor was not intended to prevent a church from hiring a foreign Christian minister, the
Court quoted approvingly from two previous judicial
opinions showing «we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity» and «the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.»
Virtually no one called
for separation in the way that the Supreme
Court understands it today: that legislation must evince secular purposes and effects, and foster no «excessive government entanglement with religion» (see Chief Justice Warren Burger's 1971
opinion in Lemon v. Kartzman).
In a unanimous
opinion, the
Court asserted,
for the first time, that «the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution.»
The answer, I think, would reveal itself readily,
for it takes little imagination to see that a move of that kind would have put a heavier burden on Justice Blackmun to sustain his
opinion for the
Court and draw allies to his side.
But in keeping with Eugene V. Rostow's characterization of the contemporary Supreme
Court as a «vital national seminar,» it is worth noting that the original charge to the
Court was only that it render an aye or a nay.44 It quickly began handing down written
opinions also, however, and under Marshall began the practice of trying
for a single majority
opinion, which gave «judicial pronouncements a forceful unity they had formerly lacked.
Because public
opinion supporting certain kinds of abortion is close to unanimous; it was formed before the 1973 Supreme
Court decision; and the majority that have come of sexual age since that year now take
for granted that fertility decisions are to be made only by the individuals involved.
In 1985, President Ronald Reagan appointed him to the United States
Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit, where he served
for thirty years, writing more than one thousand
opinions and dissents.
It is, Justice Stevens assured his fellow citizens in the
opinion for the
Court, a «content «neutral» restriction that regulates, «not speech,» but merely certain «places where some speech may occur.»
On April 27, 2015, Chief Judge Christina Reiss of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Vermont issued an
opinion that mostly favored the State of Vermont and the positions of GMO - labeling advocates.
Swaying the
court of public
opinion, and grandstanding
for any advantage prior to trial, is a hallmark of any good lawyerly «competitor».
No matter the outcome of Euro 2012, or of his trial, the
court of public
opinion — which has little respect
for matters sub judice at the best of times — handed down its verdict long ago.
The families of two children with cystic fibrosis who need new lungs but were ineligible
for adult organs have successfully used the
courts and public
opinion to get their daughter and son on the
As
for results, while the Supreme
Court is essentially immune to online outreach, the broader public isn't — and these activists were targeting a much bigger court, that of public opi
Court is essentially immune to online outreach, the broader public isn't — and these activists were targeting a much bigger
court, that of public opi
court, that of public
opinion.
Three different
courts, and three different
opinions for the
Court of Appeals to decide if it gets there.
The European rejection of the death penalty, which advocates of abolishing the death penalty in the United States cite as evidence of an emerging international consensus that ought to influence our Supreme
Court, is related both to the past overuse of it by European nations (think of the executions
for petty larceny in eighteenth - century England, the Reign of Terror in France, and the rampant employment of the death penalty by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union) and to the less democratic cast of European politics, which makes elite
opinion more likely to override public
opinion there than in the United States [emboldening mine].
In May 2017, the Maine Supreme Judicial
Court issued an advisory
opinion finding that the law's provisions applying to general elections
for state legislators and the governor violated the state constitution.