Sentences with phrase «for court purposes»

With the completion of the course for court purposes, you will receive a complimentary auto insurance discount certificate.

If you complete our course for court purposes, we'll also send you a complementary auto insurance certificate, which could save you up to 15 % on your insurance rates.

If you are taking the course for court purposes, you are usually required to submit your defensive driving certificate as proof that you have met your requirement.

If you are taking the course for court purposes, you will also be responsible for getting your defensive driving certificate to the proper court officials.

When you complete a Nevada traffic school course for court purposes, no points will be removed from your driving record.

Drivers who complete a traffic school course for court purposes will not receive a point reduction.

A cover page certifying that the records are complete will be important later potentially for court purposes.

IFAs such as Nestor compare the options of periodical payments versus lump sums on a generic basis pre-settlement for Court purposes.

When you select to use the Internet for courting purposes you have the advantage of meeting a great deal of people you haven't got the chance to fulfill prior to.

Whenever you select to use the Internet for courting purposes you have the advantage of meeting a great deal of individuals you haven't got the chance to fulfill before.

Whenever you choose to use the Internet for courting purposes you have the advantage of meeting a great deal of individuals you haven't got the chance to meet prior to.

Whenever you select to use the Internet for courting purposes you have the benefit of meeting a lot of people you haven't got the chance to fulfill prior to.

Not exact matches

Not long after the Supreme Court deemed Aereo's service «for all practical purposes a traditional cable system,» the company, in a desperate last bid for survival, pulled an about - face and argued that it should be allowed to operate like one.

But, as of today, the only court ruling on the matter concluded that Puerto Rico should be treated like a state for 11th Amendment purposes.

It's prudent for courts and congress to exercise caution before restructuring liability theories for the purpose of addressing specific market abuses, despite their apparent present magnitude.

The court granted her request but also allowed a visitation petition by the child's non-biological mother, ruling it would be inconsistent to consider the latter a parent only for purposes of paying support.

A court recently ruled that Coinbase must report information on 14,355 customers to the IRS for tax accounting purposes, an outcome Armstrong regards as a partial victory.

Kellogg faced off with Australian tennis player Thanasi Kokkinakis in court on Thursday, with the cereal giant accusing the sportsman nicknamed «Special K» of using its intellectual property for commercial purposes.

The court order does not impact the FAA's drone ruling passed last summer that requires businesses to register their drones and adhere to a number of guidelines when operating drones for commercial purposes like inspecting cellphone towers.

Part of what makes fair use cases so difficult is that there are multiple factors a court has to consider: One is the nature of the work (i.e., whether it is a commercial work), the second is the purpose of the use — specifically, whether it is «transformative» — the third is the amount of the original work used, and the fourth is the effect of the use on the market for the original product.

After the Court granted the Government's petition for leave to serve the summons, managing partner of Berns Weiss LLP and Coinbase customer Jeffrey K. Berns filed a motion challenging the summons, arguing that the IRS had no legitimate purpose in seeking the requested records, that enforcement of the summons would constitute an abuse of process, and that the categories of requested documents were overbroad.

Most courts considering laws that state governmental agencies have claimed are necessary for fiscal responsibility, which Chelan County claims is the purpose of this rate increase, have concluded that the laws are rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

Although these statutes typically contain no express limit on the size of permissible gifts, courts interpreting the statutes require corporate charitable donations to be reasonable both as to the amount and the purpose for which they are given.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

According to court filings, Thiel also «will not engage, cause any third party to engage, or provide funding to any third party for the purpose of engaging» in a removal of Gawker's archived web content.

Because status as an «employee» for purposes of the FLSA depends on the totality of circumstances rather than on any technical label, courts must examine the «economic reality» of the working relationship.

Statsure is based in Puerto Rico: - Onshore for regulatory purposes and immigration / work permits - Access to US court system - Compliant with current tax regime

Statsure is based in Puerto Rico, which is considered onshore for regulatory purposes, immigration and work permits, and has access to the US court system.

For aside from those instances in which hiring goals are ordered by a court subsequent to a finding of illegal discrimination, and with the purpose of providing relief for those discriminated against, the use of differential standards for the hiring of blacks and whites acknowledges the inability of blacks to perform up to the white standaFor aside from those instances in which hiring goals are ordered by a court subsequent to a finding of illegal discrimination, and with the purpose of providing relief for those discriminated against, the use of differential standards for the hiring of blacks and whites acknowledges the inability of blacks to perform up to the white standafor those discriminated against, the use of differential standards for the hiring of blacks and whites acknowledges the inability of blacks to perform up to the white standafor the hiring of blacks and whites acknowledges the inability of blacks to perform up to the white standard.

The causes, no doubt, are many: For example, the Court attached itself at the outset, in its 1947 Everson decision, to Justice Hugo Black's superficial and selective account of the religion clause's history and purposes.

Pretty strong language, but no stronger than the metaphor Daniel Mitchell of the Heritage Foundation used, in an op - ed article in The Washington Times, to «describe a bill designed to prevent corporations from rechartering abroad for tax purposes: Mitchell described this legislation as the «Dred Scott tax bill,» referring to the infamous 1857 Supreme Court ruling that required free states to return escaped slaves.

In its first case to address the ministerial exception doctrine in light of the Supreme Court's Hosanna - Tabor ruling, the court held that plaintiff Philip Cannata, a music director, was a «minister» for purposes of the ministerial exception doctCourt's Hosanna - Tabor ruling, the court held that plaintiff Philip Cannata, a music director, was a «minister» for purposes of the ministerial exception doctcourt held that plaintiff Philip Cannata, a music director, was a «minister» for purposes of the ministerial exception doctrine.

Sooner or later, the courts will expand the definition of marriage even further to legitimize bigamy, polygamy, sibling and parent - offspring marriages (for legal purposes having nothing to do with se.xu.ality).

This happened, for example, when the Supreme Court of the United States, in a ruling that helped to precipitate the Civil War, held in Dred Scott v. Sandford that blacks were noncitizens» and, for all practical purposes, nonpersons» possessed of no rights that white people must respect.

Against this background readers may perceive the cruel irony in Justice Brennan's opinion for the Supreme Court majority, holding the Louisiana «balanced treatment» statute unconstitutional because the creationists who promoted it had a «religious purpose.»

Notably for our purposes, at all stages of the Barnette litigation in the courts below — as in Gobitis before it — the issues had revolved entirely around the schoolchildren's claim regarding their free exercise of religion.

When the soldier refused, citing a Supreme Court ruling that states there was no requirement to pray in public ceremonies, the officer then took the matter to the platoon sergeant, who also told the soldier to bow their head for uniformity purposes, according to Patrick Jones, a Ft. Jackson Public Affairs Officer.

The Supreme Court also declared it a religion, for first amendment purposes.

As White expressed it, the potential for impermissible fostering of religion in secular classrooms — an untested, assumption of the court, so far as he was concerned — paradoxically rendered unacceptable the state's efforts to ensure that secular teachers under religious discipline would successfully avoid conflicts between the religious mission of the school and the secular purpose of the state's education program.

Virtually no one called for separation in the way that the Supreme Court understands it today: that legislation must evince secular purposes and effects, and foster no «excessive government entanglement with religion» (see Chief Justice Warren Burger's 1971 opinion in Lemon v. Kartzman).

Burger's statement can only mean that the court sees itself empowered by our history and tradition to forbid the people and their elected representatives from discussing, for any practical purpose, issues that might raise questions about the meaning and intention of the religion clause of the First Amendment.

In effect, the Court makes it impossible to have anything other than a procedural common good as a motive or purpose for political activity.

This happened, for example, when the Supreme Court of the United States, in a ruling that helped to precipitate the Civil War, held in Dred Scott v. Sandford that blacks were noncitizens — and, for all practical purposes, nonpersons — possessed of no rights that white people must respect.

The homeowner was charged with assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm.Lawrence Manzer from Burton, New Brunswick was dragged through court after he was charged with possessing a weapon for a purpose dangerous to public peace.

In a decision that should chill the blood of everyone who believes in religious freedom, the court stated: «That the new rules prohibit all improper reasons for refusal to dispense medication... suggests that the purpose of the new rules was not to eliminate religious objections to delivery of lawful medicines but to eliminate all objections that do not ensure patient health, safety, and access to medication.

s. 20 — Prohibition against unconscionable conduct s. 21 — Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services s. 22 — Matters the court may have regard to for the purposes of section 21

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

The court ruled that, for purposes of summary judgment, the plaintiff class established a defect not because their individually purchased products contained biological contaminants, but rather because the act of recalling potentially contaminated food provided evidence of a product defect.

The ACCC has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court alleging that Australian Egg Corporation Limited (AECL)(and its managing director and two directors) and two egg producing companies, Ironside Management Services Pty Ltd (T / A Twelve Oak Poultry) and Farm Pride Foods Limited attempted to induce egg producers who were members of AECL «to enter into an arrangement to cull hens or otherwise dispose of eggs, for the purpose of reducing the amount of eggs available for supply to consumers and businesses in Australia»).