Sentences with phrase «for current warming»

At the end, we'll be left with no viable explanation for current warming except AGW.

However, recent warming is the result of many natural and man - made factors, and it is extraordinarily difficult to assign all the blame for current warming to man.

If it was warmer then than now, natural variability would seem to be a legitimate reason for current warming.

There are over 1000 peer - reviewed papers that support anthropogenic causation for the current warming epoch.

There are over 1000 peer - reviewed papers that support anthropogenic causation for the current warming epoch.

The commonly held assumption of a factor of 2 — 3 for the Arctic amplification has been valid only for the current warming period 1970 — 2008.

The other thing that bothers me is that if one of the lines of evidence for the current warming having man's fingerprint is that the models without man's influence do not coincide with reality that is warmer.

The original topic of the conversation was whether Romm's graph made a convincing case for the current warming being unusual and concerning in the context of Holocene history.

The charts I did are around pages 6 - 7 of the pdf, the ones showing the projected curve of global warming for various climate sensitivities, and backing into what that should imply for current warming.

The sceptics and uninformed love to cite these periods as natural analogs for current warming too — pure rubbish.

According to Victor's claim historical climate must be caused by magic, magic that we can not identify for the current warming trend.

Using a time period when CO2 did not change at all, to support a general conclusion that «CO2 is not the driver of climate change» and hence is not responsible for the current warming, is hardly logical.

The bottom line is that regardless of whether or not the D - O cycles are triggered by the Sun, the timing is clearly not right for this cycle to be responsible for the current warming.

Bond et al. (1999) added further evidence that the timing of D - O events disqualifies them from being responsible for the current warming, by showing that the most recent D - O event may have contributed to the Little Ice Age (LIA):

Raypierre and also Chris (comment 29) noted that «sceptics» should not just magically forget about or omit the established greenhouse gas physics when trumpeting exotic solar explanations for current warming.

Using a time period when CO2 did not change at all, to support a general conclusion that «CO2 is not the driver of climate change» and hence is not responsible for the current warming, is hardly logical.

I don't see how anyone can still cling to the cosmic ray theory of climate change (at least as an explanation for current warming) given these facts.

If it is so, then how can we give any credence to the theory that human CO2 output, alone, is responsible for current warming?

The bottom line is that regardless of whether or not the D - O cycles are triggered by the Sun, the timing is clearly not right for this cycle to be responsible for the current warming.

Bond et al. (1999) added further evidence that the timing of D - O events disqualifies them from being responsible for the current warming, by showing that the most recent D - O event may have contributed to the Little Ice Age (LIA):