Beyond hiring innovative law school graduates for fellowships, expect the ABA to continue to press
for curricular reform.
Indeed, the pace of globalization among American law schools has become a flashpoint for institutional competition, with numerous institutions jockeying to lay claim to leadership in this arena.5 Not surprisingly, the case for globalization has spawned a variety of explicit proposals
for curricular reform.6 These include proposals for both significantly expanding transnationally focused upper - level electives7 and incorporating transnational legal issues into the traditional domestic curriculum, 8 including first - year programs.9
Eberle has written numerous publications on professional development, life planning, and policy change, including co-authoring a white paper summary of the 2015 Future of Biomedical Graduate and Postdoctoral Training (FOBGAPT) symposium, which presented recommended steps
for curricular reform and better practices to support postdocs and graduate students.
Not exact matches
While identifying guiding themes
for the discussions — National strategy development and implementation;
Curricular reform and education at the national and local levels; Competence development of educators; Quality support and monitoring; Campaigning and outreach — the Congress objectives are twofold:
For example, the content knowledge and problem - solving skills measured by the PARCC and MCAS tests are not identical, and the tests might differ in the extent to which they align with specific high - school
curricular reform goals or teaching standards.
Alongside transparency - oriented testing based on rigorous standards
for the
curricular core, here are four drivers of tomorrow's
reforms that are already nudging in promising directions and have the potential to push much harder:
OECD's BIAC has also documented employers» wishes
for deep
curricular reforms to modernize content and embed competencies in order to meet today's market needs.
As a new academic year ramps up, so do goals
for student achievement,
curricular reforms, teacher development, and more.
In addition, these factors, which are unique to each state yet difficult to account
for, may influence a state's decision to adopt
reforms like minimum - competency tests and higher
curricular standards.
«Second, a structural
reform would have to be linked with a
curricular reform, otherwise those teachers who resisted the
reform may continue to teach their pupils in the same ways as they had
for many years.
Since the contributors to this collection are so uniformly hostile to current
reform initiatives, from testing and accountability to charters and vouchers and more traditional
curricular emphases, it is fair to ask, what education model are they
for?
Since the 1960's there have been many attempts to
reform education;
curricular changes, new approaches toward teaching reading and math, teacher preparation, programs
for the disadvantaged, different instructional approaches, new technologies introduced, and so on.
Since the 1960s, efforts to
reform education — including various
curricular changes, reading approaches, teacher preparation, money
for the disadvantaged, and different instructional approaches — have failed to bring about true systemic change because the
reforms fail to deal with a different definition of learning.
Assessing What Really Matters in Schools: Creating Hope
for the Future, by Ronald J. Newell and Mark J. Van Ryzin, asserts that» «since the 1960s, efforts to
reform education — including various
curricular changes, reading approaches, teacher preparation, money
for the disadvantaged, and different instructional approaches — have failed to bring about true systemic change because the
reforms fail to deal with a different definition of learning.»»
Another extremely productive use of social science in legal educational
reform is emerging from programs designed to help law schools assess their own progress.27 Indiana,
for example, tracks both its innovative first - year
curricular innovations and its novel forms of law student assessment.
Minow chaired the law school's
curricular reform efforts of recent years and was recognized with the School's Sacks - Freund Award
for Teaching Excellence in 2005.
Similarly, the endless navel - gazing discussions about teaching pedagogy, exam writing and exam - taking advice, practical credentials
for doctrinal faculty,
curricular reform, law school rankings, and the very identity and purpose of a law school and its relationship to lawyering would benefit from some thought and understanding about the role of the LRW course.
This information is valuable
for policy makers who need to identify education policy priorities, schools that need to
reform curricular and extracurricular practices, and parents who need to adjust their home learning environments and parenting practices.»