Sentences with phrase «for developing countries»

There was minimal progress on climate finance for developing countries, with several European countries making pledges totaling US$ 6 billion over the next three years.
It will also mean that rich countries will have to provide finance and technology for developing countries to allow them to develop in a low - carbon, sustainable manner.
Moreover, it should reflect emission reduction targets for developed countries and nationally appropriate mitigation actions by developing countries.
The need for developed countries to have a flexible range of option was also a theme stressed throughout the panel.
Developed countries, do not approve of this, because it means that there is less incentives for developing countries to host their country's offset projects.
It will be important for developing countries to have access to the technology that can help with education, infrastructure, health and productivity, the tools needed to lift people out of poverty.
The effect of the policy to reduce the populations for developing country on last 50 years ago.
There are significant advantages of fossil energies for developed countries to continue using these energy sources.
The document stresses that there are multiple opportunities for developing countries to grow in a sustainable manner.
This makes it an attractive option for developing countries with little infrastructure.
For them this involves developed countries taking the lead on reducing emissions and providing finance and assistance for developing countries undertaking a low - carbon transformation.
Will the final agreement be a fair and just agreement for the most vulnerable developing countries or will it be a favorable agreement for developed countries with power?
Such an effort would yield enormous economic benefits for developing countries and for the world as a whole.
The report identifies key capacity issues for developing countries and proposes concrete recommendations for the wider use of renewable energy technologies to promote sustainable development and poverty reduction.
To ensure environmental integrity in an equitable manner developed countries must reduce their emissions by more than 40 % and leave sustainable development space for developing countries.
These commitments are based on the legal principle of common but differentiated responsibilities that incorporates a grace period for developing countries and financial and technology transfer support.
Support pledged by developed countries for developing country actions would also be included.
We want to be more constructive so let's see how we can change the drivers, especially for developing countries, especially for emerging economies.
It could be a great way for developing countries, regardless of their position on the map, to open their borders to international business.
In particular, it does not seem accurate enough to be the basis for the developed countries imposing a trillion dollar a year cost to their economies.
Thus, a 26 % reduction by 2030 is neither ambitious nor fair for developing countries.
Then, from 1997 to 2006, recommendations for developing countries focused on private rights.
This helps bring prices to an affordable level for developing countries while still making it profitable for the manufacturers.
The purpose of the «treaty» is to provide a framework for developed countries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases primarily by reducing their use of fossil fuels.
Some say that the best thing for developing countries is cheap energy, fossil or otherwise, to accelerate the climb out of poverty.
At the negotiation, many speakers are talking about legal binding and equity for developing countries.
Making $ 50 billion of public finance available must remain a key ask for developing countries and the steps towards achieving it should be taken NOW!
The proposed framework opens the door for developing countries to possibly receive compensation for losses and damages that are incurred when efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change have failed.
This program has been a focal point for developing countries to develop national activities of adaptation to climate change.
The joint implementation strategy will only be available for developed countries to enter agreements between other developed countries.
I personally regret that these models are not now promoted for developing countries.
The findings raise concern for developing countries across the globe.
What's more, the high cost makes it practically impossible for developing countries, in particular, to conduct tests at all.
Adaptive measures for developed countries may be implemented in time, but many nations in the world will be vulnerable to runaway climate change.
Nonetheless, it certainly qualifies as a «good read», and a must read for anyone who is, or plans to be, involved in literacy drives for developing countries.
These competing goals must be balanced for developing countries to join a new global climate regime.
Nevertheless I think that the outcome of the convention will not be very bright for the developing countries.
Focusing only on consumer - end energy usage is also deeply misleading for developing countries.
It is the most affordable approach for developed countries, while providing significant new sources of development finance to tackle poverty in the developing world.
So without a major boost in carbon productivity, stabilizing greenhouse - gas emissions would require a major drop in lifestyle for developed countries and would hinder economic development in low income countries.
Green banks could be an important source of capital for developing countries struggling for to fund sustainability projects.
They are not providing the finance necessary for developing countries to adapt and mitigate, and have introduced mechanisms that benefit huge corporations rather than the people affected by climate change.
At stake: potentially billions of dollars for developing countries.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z