As one person put it, «the cheerleaders
for doing something about global warming seem to be largely the cheerleaders for many causes of which I disapprove».
Not exact matches
From a US political standpoint, though, I find it troubling that
for the US to «
do»
something about global warming, such as joining the Kyoto Protocol, would require potentially serious negative economic impacts on the US economy.
Opinion polls
for the past decade have consistently shown that the public would like to see
something done about the
global warming problem, along with many other environmental issues.
If
global warming is only caused by burning of fossil fuels then it may be possible
for humans to
do something about global warming.
From the standpoint of
doing something about global warming, the uncertainties are irrelevant unless we don't care what kind of world we leave
for future generations - of humans and polar bears.
The entire scam — essentially blaming Exxon
for knowing
something about «
global warming» it couldn't possibly have known because, hey, nobody
did at the time; they don't even know now — was purely designed as a shakedown.
I find the
global warming arguments extremely compelling, but I notice
something peculiar — that we seem to forget that long before «AGW» became a common topic, we saw many causes
for alarm over the downside of
doing so little to hedge our bets
about energy sources, and back then we had little concept of the potential of China, e.g., to match and raise our own carbon fuel appetite.
The Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, a political independent, just endorsed President Obama
for re-election because Bloomberg thinks Obama will
do something about global warming.
Since that time three or four years ago, there has been no comfortable way
for the scientific community to raise the spectre of serious uncertainty
about the forecasts of climatic disaster... It can no longer escape prime responsibility if it should turn out in the end that
doing something in the name of mitigation of
global warming is the costliest scientific mistake ever visited on humanity.
If that continues, we may buy some time to
do something about global warming, but more likely we would use it as an excuse
for delay.
People — whether Americans, Europeans, Chinese, or Brazilians — want to
do something about global warming; they just don't want to pay much more
for energy to
do it.
In short, that treatise provided the proverbial under - the - hood look at the inner workings of today's state - of - the - art climate models that provide the basis
for the belief that
global warming is a problem and that
something must be
done about it.
The Cancun
global warming and wealth redistribution summit concluded last week, with little to show
for two weeks of talking in 5 - star hotels and restaurants, other than vague promises that countries will try to
do something meaningful
about the «threat» of «dangerous» climate change.
Growing concern
about global warming - and the urge to
do something about it - is a boon
for startups like TerraPass, an outfit that's in the guilt - reduction business.