If voters become accustomed to this system - which is likely - it will be easier
for electoral reform supporters to bid for a new referendum in the future.
A recent Democrat & Chronicle story on the
push for electoral reforms in New York noted that the measures face «an uphill climb in the Republican - controlled Senate, where the GOP has long raised concern about opening the door to voter fraud.»
Arguing for electoral reform in isolation from a full bloodied constitutional settlement that includes the UK's national question was far too limited and asked to fail.
Continue reading «The Liberal Democrat
dream for electoral reform may be dead for a generation... and their «friends» on the Left have helped to kill it»»
Indeed, can't I equally argue that Neal Lawson risks narrowing his coalition of support
for electoral reform by suggesting that the existence of a national campaign on PR means postponing or vetoing any consideration of party reform issues on their merits (where he seems to argue that the principle would be one he would support, were it not for this context)?
Although debates about electoral reform since 2009 have centred on proposals to replace «first - past - the - post» with the alternative vote (AV), there are numerous other
options for electoral reform in the UK.
The landmark survey commissioned by the Broadbent Institute is the first study of its kind and size to measure Canadians» attitudes about voting system design and
preference for electoral reform.
Matthew Elliott, who played a key role in defeating Nick Clegg's
plans for electoral reform in the No to AV campaign in 2011, will serve as chief executive.
Conservatives say the dramatic shakeup of Britain's electoral map, which could hand the party around a dozen more seats at the general election, was a quid pro
quo for the electoral reform referendum, which took place in May 2011.
Perhaps if talk of Labour becoming more like a movement comes to fruition, we may see the popular grassroots call
for electoral reform translated into policy.
I believed at the time it was signed that the coalition deal wiped out support
for electoral reform because it meant its core left wing rump, which felt it would ensure more left wing government in future, suddenly felt that wasn't true any more.
@Joe (54): Yes, the hypocrisy of the Beeb in explicitly calling the result a
defeat for electoral reform WHEN THEY HAD REFUSED TO CALL AV ELECTORAL REFORM THROUGHOUT THE CAMPAIGN ITSELF was truly sickening and mind - blowing.
This evening you can attend a rally in Westminster's Methodist Central Hall, organised by the Vote for Change coalition, with music by Billy Bragg to stir your
stumps for electoral reform.
If, as Downing Street is arguing, the Tory election campaign was as good as it could have been, then the
enthusiasm for electoral reform within Cameron's circle makes more sense.
[78] In July 2005, a new
law for electoral reforms was approved which prevented electoral gerrymandering by cutting the number of electoral districts from 25 to 5.
And even if cooperation didn't, after all, mean ministerial rovers for a handful of Liberal Democrats, or a bum on a seat round the cabinet table, still it seemed for a few heady months that it could at least deliver a
timetable for electoral reform and, at some point in the middle distance, that long - awaited referendum.
Video: In Sheffield Hallam and High Peak, John Harris makes the case for no clear winner and the chance for electoral reform
It is logical for a coalition fighting one last first - past - the - post election to seek a
mandate for electoral reform (though how far the Lib Dems reciprocating would benefit Labour is partly a tactical judgement about how their vote would divide).
There are clear
necessities for electoral reform, improving local democracy, tackling climate change, and re-balancing the inequalities in society which will require more than the Labour party to bring about.
The paper says the election presents a «huge opportunity»
for electoral reform with a Lib Dem government or coalition ushering in proportional representation, which would provide a true mirror of Britain's political landscape.
Gripping a can of lager and muttering darkly about the foreigners on the east side of town, Pete Johnson makes an unlikely
champion for electoral reform.
Away from the streets of Margate, there are signs that the British public also feels that the election results have made the case
for electoral reform undeniable; 30,000 people signed a petition supporting change to the voting system in the first five hours after it was launched at midday last Friday — 100 people a minute.
Advocates for electoral reform say that the outcome has again exposed the limitations of the first - past - the - post system, prompting urgent calls for a change to the way Britain votes.
The prospect of coalition revived
hopes for electoral reform and the Lib Dems were offered AV without plebiscite by Brown and a binding referendum on AV by Cameron.
His
backing for electoral reform - which would mean scrapping the first - past - the - post system on which Westminster MPs are elected in favour of some form of proportional representation (PR)- came as John Denham, the skills secretary, also let it be known that he favours considering a number of «radical steps», including electoral reform.