Sentences with phrase «for electronic records management»

The student's aptitude for electronic records management resources also comes in useful.

See; (1) «Admissibility of Electronic Records Requires Proof of Records Management System Integrity»; (2) «Electronic Records as Evidence»; (3) «The Admissibility of Electronic Business Records,» (2010), 8 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 105; and, (4) «A Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems.»

It doesn't deal with: (1) the great size and complexity of such systems — they operate using tens of millions of lines of software code; (2) the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management; (3) the serious, and very common errors in ERMSs; and, (4) the need for ERMS software with acceptable error rates.

254, 254.1); (3) applications can be brought for orders for the production of their maintenance logs — see the decisions that have cited R. v. Kilpatrick, 2013 ABQB 5 (paras. 48 - 99), leave to appeal refused, R. v. Kilpatrick 2013 ABCA 168; and, (4) in relation to such evidence, the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management were applied in, R. v. Oler, 2014 ABPC 130.

And it is the foundation concept of the National Standard of Canada for electronic records management: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admissibility.

A similar relationship in law should be established between e-discovery and admissibility proceedings, and the National Standard of Canada for electronic records management.

[4] Therefore, during e-discovery proceedings concerning large ERMSs, opposing lawyers should be asking one another: «Is your client's electronic records management system in compliance with the National Standard of Canada for electronic records management, and if so, when was the last time it was so certified by an expert in electronic records management?»

Plus, our time - tested technology offers an out - of - the - box Applied Systems software integration and a Microsoft Dynamics CRM integration to meet your agency's overall needs for electronic records management.

41.1 - 41.8 of the Alberta Evidence Act); (4) the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management, [i] necessary for giving the word «integrity» a meaning in those sections; and, (5) that the solution to the high cost of the «review» stage of electronic discovery proceedings requires a different strategy and procedure than are used now.

Two of the four records management components for such a certification process are already in place: (1) Canada has authoritative national standards for electronic records management, which are based upon well established international standards; and, (2) there is a well developed profession of experienced experts in ERMS technology.

Now, instead of the legal profession providing such legal services, the records management profession is providing general legal information, including information on the «legal requirements» of the national standards for electronic records management, and not involving lawyers in their work.

(6) revising the records provisions of the Evidence Acts in Canada in support of these innovations by adding a «rebuttable presumption of inadequacy,» so as to enforce proof of compliance with the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management;

Such is also true of their legal departments, as is shown by the absence of ERMS issues in almost all case law and guidelines concerning the use of electronic records as evidence, including the four Sedona Canada Principles texts; see: Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 17 (pdf).

[8] See for example this article: Ken Chasse, «Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 17, a U.K. «open source» journal, i.e., providing free downloading of articles (click «Archives» to access the contents of volume 9).

«Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review» 17 (U.K.)(this article is written for related professions as well as for lawyers).

See these articles (pdf): (1) «Admissibility of Electronic Records Requires Proof of Records Management System Integrity»; (2) «The Sedona Canada Principles are Very Inadequate on Records Management and for Electronic Discovery»; (3) «A Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems»; (4) «Electronic Records as Evidence»; and, (5) «Solving the High Cost of the «Review» Stage of Electronic Discovery».

Large or complex ERMSs should be certified once per year as being in compliance with 72.34, and whenever significant changes are made; see: «A Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems.»

Since 1978 he has been a legal advisor in the development of the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management.

Canada's National Standards for Electronic Records Management and amending the Evidence Acts

Two of the four components for such a certification process are already in place: (1) Canada has authoritative national standards for electronic records management, that are based upon well established international standards; and, (2) there is a well developed profession of experienced experts in ERMS technology.

That is why the application of the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management is so very necessary.

Also, the 2nd edition will not direct sufficient attention to: (1) the serious, common defects of records management and of software, and their considerable worsening of the difficulty of determining the adequacy of disclosure made in discovery proceedings; and, (2) the fact that the admissibility of records is dependent upon proof of the «integrity» of the records systems in which they are stored, which requires proof of the compliance of such records systems with the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management.

Not exact matches

• CentralReach, a Pompano Beach, Fla. - based provider of electronic health record and practice management software for clinics focused on applied behavioral analysis and speech therapy, raised funding of an undisclosed amount, from Insight Venture Partners.

SaaS apps are tools used by Healthcare providers and benefits them through various healthcare applications for their EMR (electronic medical record), EHR (electronic health record) software, and revenue cycle management software.

«Our results indicate that this simple intervention could be an effective and scalable approach to use the design of electronic health records to increase the rate of flu vaccinations, which are estimated to prevent millions of flu cases and tens of thousands of related hospitalizations every year,» said study lead author Mitesh S. Patel, MD, MBA, MS, an assistant professor of Medicine and Health Care Management in Penn's Perelman School of Medicine and The Wharton School, a staff physician at the Crescenz VA Medical Center, and director of the Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, whose work is supported by the Penn Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics.

Ram and her collaborators — including Wenli Zhang, a UA doctoral student in management information systems, and researchers from the Parkland Center for Clinical Innovation — created a model that was able to successfully predict approximately how many asthma sufferers would visit the emergency room at a large hospital in Dallas on a given day, based on an analysis of data gleaned from electronic medical records, air quality sensors and Twitter.

When the records are no longer required for safety compliance and enforcement activities, they are sent to the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) to be archived in accordance with FMCSA retention procedures.

Equipment / Features on this * Toyota Prius * Air Conditioning Climate Control Cruise Control Power Steering Power Windows Power Mirrors Tilt Steering Wheel Telescoping Steering Wheel Steering Wheel Radio Controls Driver Airbag Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Keyless Entry Abs Brakes Rear Defogger Intermittent Wipers Am / Fm Cd Player Auto - Off Projector - Beam Halogen Headlamps Color - Keyed Folding Pwr Heated Mirrors Intermittent Rear Window Wiper Led Tail Lamps P195 / 65R15 All - Season Tires Rear Deck Spoiler - Inc: Underbody Spoilers & Spats T135 / 80D16 Compact Spare Tire Uv Reduction Glass Windshield (2) 12V Pwr Outlets (4) Retractable Assist Grips 60/40 Split Rear Seat 6 - Way Driver / 4 - Way Passenger Front Bucket Seats Active Headrests Adjustable Front / Rear Headrests - Inc: Fold - Forward Rear Headrests Cargo Area Lamp Instant Fuel Consumption Fuel Gauge Shift - Position Indicator Ev / Eco / Power Mode Indicators Driver & Passenger Seatback Pockets Dual Compartment Glove Box Dual Front Sunvisors W / Illuminated Vanity Mirrors Front Center Console W / Sliding Armrest - Inc: Storage Compartment W / Removable Utility Tray Wire - Management Feature (2) Cup Holders Illuminated Entry Multi-Information Display - Inc: Energy Monitor Fuel Consumption History Hybrid System Indicator Average Fuel Economy Distance To Empty Trip Distance Eco Saving Record Overhead Console W / Map Lights & Shift Illumination Rear Dome Light Rear Fold - Down Armrest W / (2) Cup Holders Retained Accessory Pwr Audio Controls Hvac Controls Voice - Command Controls Tonneau Cover W / Clasp For Under - Floor Storage 1.8 L Dohc 16 - Valve Vvt - I Atkinson - Cycle I4 Hybrid Engine Electric Pwr Assisted Rack & Pinion Steering Electronic Throttle Control System W / Intelligence (Etcs - I)- Inc: Eco Ev & Pwr Driving Modes Independent Macpherson Strut Suspension W / Stabilizer Bar Torsion Beam Rear Suspension Ventilated Front & Solid Rear Pwr Disc Brakes Entune W / 3 - Year Complimentary Subscription - Inc: Bing Iheartradio Movietickets.Com Opentable Pandora Real - Time Traffic Info Real - Time Weather Info Real - Time Fuel Prices Real - Time Sports Info Real - Time Stock Info 3 - Point Seatbelts W / Front Pretensioners & Force Limiters Brake Assist (Ba) Adjustable Front Seatbelt Shoulder Anchors - Inc: Auto Locking Retractors (Alr / Elr) On All Passenger Seatbelts Child Safety Rear Door Locks Daytime Running Lights (Drl) W / On / Off Direct Tire Pressure Monitoring System Driver Knee Airbag Driver / Front Passenger Advanced Airbags W / Occupant Classification Sensor Hill Start Assist Control (Hac) Latch (Lower Anchors & Tethers For Children) System For Outboard Rear Seats Side - Impact Door Beams Smart Stop Technology (Sst) Vehicle Proximity Notification System (Vpns) 12V Power Outlet Aux.

This process will require significant library staff time, particularly for licensing and electronic records management.

Sedona Canada does not analyze: (1) the meaning and consequences of the «system integrity concept» in the e-records provisions of the Evidence Acts — proof of «records integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords provisions of the Evidence Acts — proof of «records integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the nationalElectronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national stRecords as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the nationalelectronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management systems (ERMS's) with the national standard.

Such certification of compliance work has been done for many years by experts in electronic records management.

Electronic Records Management Systems» (ERMSs») procedures for facilitating accurate access and re-use;

My experience comes from having worked for many years with experts in electronic records management systems technology, creating, altering, and repairing large institutional ERMS's.

My published paper «The Sedona Canada Principles are Very Inadequate on Records Management and for Electronic Discovery» [i] criticizes the first edition (January 2008) of: The Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery (hereinafter, «Sedona Canada») because it provides neither analysis nor description of the relationship between electronic discovery and electronic records management sRecords Management and for Electronic Discovery» [i] criticizes the first edition (January 2008) of: The Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery (hereinafter, «Sedona Canada») because it provides neither analysis nor description of the relationship between electronic discovery and electronic records managemenManagement and for Electronic Discovery» [i] criticizes the first edition (January 2008) of: The Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery (hereinafter, «Sedona Canada») because it provides neither analysis nor description of the relationship between electronic discovery and electronic records managemenElectronic Discovery» [i] criticizes the first edition (January 2008) of: The Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery (hereinafter, «Sedona Canada») because it provides neither analysis nor description of the relationship between electronic discovery and electronic records managemenElectronic Discovery (hereinafter, «Sedona Canada») because it provides neither analysis nor description of the relationship between electronic discovery and electronic records managemenelectronic discovery and electronic records managemenelectronic records management srecords managementmanagement systems.

Management of services, staff, budget and evaluation at the strategic and operational level, makes law librarians a great fit for electronic document / records mManagement of services, staff, budget and evaluation at the strategic and operational level, makes law librarians a great fit for electronic document / records managementmanagement.

However, the Principles are not intended to place significant focus on records management (RM) or the importance or desirability of appropriate RM practices so as to be properly prepared for litigation, or on issues related to the integrity of information systems under Evidence Acts, or on the substantive law related to the admissibility of electronic records into evidence.

We have noted your comments that the Principles [Sedona Canada Principles] are «very inadequate» on Records Management and for Electronic Discovery.

For many years he has worked with such experts by providing legal opinions in relation to their servicing the electronic records management systems of large institutions.

Like a drop of water in a pool of water, it is dependent upon its electronic records management system (its ERMS) for everything, i.e., records integrity requires proof of records system integrity.

I know from my experience: (1) as a legal advisor since 1978, in the creation of national standards for records management; and, (2) working with such experts since 1988, to provide legal opinions that accompany such experts» certifications of compliance of institutional clients» ERMSs with records management standards, how very prevalent, bad and inadequate electronic records management is.

In regard to best evidence rule issues, admissibility of electronic records requires proof of the «systems integrity» of the electronic records management systems (ERMSs) in which the records are recorded or stored; see for example: Canada Evidence Act (CEA) s. 31.2 (1)(a); Ontario Evidence Act (OEA) s. 34.1 (5), (5.1); Alberta Evidence Act s. 41.4 (1), (2); and the, Nova Scotia Evidence Act s. 23D (1).

For example, these frequently used evidence - producing types of technology go unchallenged: (1) mobile phone tower location evidence used to locate us - very frequently used because we all carry mobile phones; (2) breathalyzer / intoxilyzer readings; (3) electronic records management systems (records are now the most frequently used kind of evidence); and, (4) the technology that produces the data used to formulate expert opinion evidence.

I vainly thought that 2 of my recent innovative Slaw articles might qualify for such recognition: (1) «Solving the High Cost of the «Review» Stage of Electronic Discovery»; Slaw, April 17, 2014; and, (2) «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management», Slaw Nov. 22, 2013.

Serving as outside employment counsel for national fluids testing company with laboratories across the US for all multistate employment matters including investigations, wage and hour compliance, individual terminations and mass layoffs, electronic record keeping issues, and all other risk - management matters.

And worse, the drafting committee of the 2nd edition of the «Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing Electronic Discovery,» will not compensate for the impact of the change (from pre-electronic paper records technology, to electronic records management technology) upon the efficacy of all laws concerning the use of electronic records asElectronic Discovery,» will not compensate for the impact of the change (from pre-electronic paper records technology, to electronic records management technology) upon the efficacy of all laws concerning the use of electronic records aselectronic paper records technology, to electronic records management technology) upon the efficacy of all laws concerning the use of electronic records aselectronic records management technology) upon the efficacy of all laws concerning the use of electronic records aselectronic records as evidence.

Its high cost, dependence upon the quality of electronic records management, interdependence with admissibility of evidence rules and practices, and development of TAR (technology aided review) software, which in itself raises many complex issues, will maintain disclosure and discovery's importance to all litigators for many years to come.

«Technologically competent» also requires knowledge of the electronic technology that now produces most of the evidence, and very frequently used types of evidence; for example, these kinds of evidence: (1) records are now the most frequently used kind of evidence but most often come from very complex electronic records management systems; (2) mobile phone tracking evidence because we all carry mobile phones; (3) breathalyzer device readings because they are the basis of more than 95 % of impaired driving cases; and, (4) expert opinion evidence that depends upon data produced by electronic systems and devices.

iManage Govern includes iManage Records Manager for paper and electronic records management — for which a new version 6.3 was launched today — and iManage Archive Manager for long - term storage and governance of professional work pRecords Manager for paper and electronic records management — for which a new version 6.3 was launched today — and iManage Archive Manager for long - term storage and governance of professional work precords management — for which a new version 6.3 was launched today — and iManage Archive Manager for long - term storage and governance of professional work product.

See also: «The Sedona Canada Principles are Very Inadequate on Records Management and for Electronic Discovery»; and my Feb. 12th Slaw post, Electronic Discovery: The Concept and Purpose of the Sedona Canada Principles 2nd Edition, and, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other records management articles listed on my SSRN author'Records Management and for Electronic Discovery»; and my Feb. 12th Slaw post, Electronic Discovery: The Concept and Purpose of the Sedona Canada Principles 2nd Edition, and, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other records management articles listed on my SSRN authManagement and for Electronic Discovery»; and my Feb. 12th Slaw post, Electronic Discovery: The Concept and Purpose of the Sedona Canada Principles 2nd Edition, and, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other records management articles listed on my SSRN author'Records as Evidence,» and the other records management articles listed on my SSRN author'records management articles listed on my SSRN authmanagement articles listed on my SSRN author's page.

The colloquium held in New York in February of this year looked at several topics that be dealt with productively at the international level: identity management, mobile e-commerce, transferable electronic records and «single window» systems for border crossing or shipping documents.