Yes, George W. Bush refused federal funding
for embryonic stem - cell research, but that hardly put a stop to it (and not much changed after Barack Obama reversed the policy).
An example: «Yes, George W. Bush refused federal funding
for embryonic stem - cell research, but that hardly put a stop to it (and not much changed after Barack Obama reversed the policy).»
Studies have identified transcription factors such as Stat3, Nanog, and Oct4 as being necessary
for embryonic stem (ES) cell self - renewal and maintenance of pluripotency.
But pro-life groups are strongly opposing the vote because the ballot measure, if approved, will force residents to pay
for embryonic stem cell research with their tax dollars.
EVEN AS the U.S. senate debates on expanding federal funding
for embryonic stem cell research, it may be remembered that the claims professed in many papers of adult stem cells becoming any specialised cells should be taken with a pinch of salt.
As the debate rages in Washington, research continues outside the U.S. and in states that provide money or grants
for embryonic stem - cell research.
The battle between Bush and Congress comes as polls show growing support
for embryonic stem - cell research.
On March 9, 2009, President Obama lifted the ban that had previously restricted the use of federal funds
for embryonic stem cell research on cell lines that had been created after August 9, 2001.
The legislation would have eased restrictions on federal funding
for embryonic stem - cell research.
There are currently no clinically approved treatments
for embryonic stem cells.
A genome - scale RNAi screen for Oct4 modulators defines a role of the Paf1 complex
for embryonic stem cell identity.
Bush sought to honor the spirit, if not, perhaps, the letter, of Dickey - Wicker by providing funding
for embryonic stem - cell research without incentivizing further embryo destruction.
To begin with, demand
for embryonic stem cells will continue in the near future.
And in a way, this is not very radical because that's what Bush said in August of 2001 when he became the first president to authorize federal funds
for embryonic stem cell research.
And yet again, when presented with the case
for embryonic stem cell research primarily on the grounds of curing disease, the respondents expressed support.
First, promising to restore the integrity of science while seeking vast medical benefits for many, President Obama repealed the restrictions set by President Bush on the use of federal funds
for embryonic stem cell research.
The count
for embryonic stem cells is zero.
It is not known how long it will take
for embryonic stem cells to become a useful therapy or whether they will ever directly do so.
The rise of these iPS cells has reduced the need
for embryonic stem cells — which have long caused ethical concerns for some — and iPS cells now form the basis for most of today's stem cell research.
Scientists from the Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) have discovered that NANOG, an essential gene
for embryonic stem cells, also regulates cell division in stratified epithelia — those that form part of the epidermis of the skin or cover the esophagus or the vagina — in adult organisms.
The researchers discovered that this region is required to both turn Sox2 on, and
for the embryonic stem cells to maintain their characteristic appearance and ability to differentiate into all the cell types of the adult organism.
The results point to indirect genomic regulatory mechanisms which are important
for embryonic stem cells and maintain gene expression, say Riikka Lund and Riitta Lahesmaa.
Recently, however, I was alarmed to hear that my fellow Delawareans voted to oust Representative Mike Castle, a solid moderate who pushed
for embryonic stem cell research and was handily elected as the Republican representative of a largely Democratic state for nine consecutive terms, in favor of Christine O'Donnell, who, as far as I can tell, is a houseplant.
The president has lifted the Bush restrictions on federal funding
for embryonic stem cell research.
Many scientists credit it with providing a safe harbor
for embryonic stem cell research, which has often come under political attack, and boosting stem cell research more broadly.
They then argue that «By creating a financial incentive
for embryonic stem cell research — an incentive that by NIH's own admission involves investments of «hundreds of millions of dollars» — and by specifying the precise means by which embryos must be destroyed in order to qualify for federal funding, the NIH necessarily and knowingly subjects embryos to a substantial risk of injury or death.»
Researchers at Geron, meanwhile, had successfully derived neurons from human embryonic stem cells and were pursuing research that would eventually look to repair the damage caused by spinal - cord injuries, a possible use
for embryonic stem cells that was much touted at the time.
President Obama is poised to issue an executive order this week reversing Bush administration limits on federal financing
for embryonic stem - cell research.
In 2005, before a Congressional hearing in the U.S., Prof. George Q. Daley of Harvard spoke forcefully and influentially about the necessity
for embryonic stem - cell research to go ahead, and dismissed suggestions that one could work instead with «induced pluripotent stem cells» («iPS», i.e. stem cells reprogrammed from some cells of a living adult).
Sullivan went on to suggest that Chaput is using a double standard in the 2008 election by criticizing Catholic supporters of Barack Obama, while turning a blind eye to John McCain's support
for embryonic stem cell research.
• President Obama did not go half far enough in lifting the ban against federal funding
for embryonic stem - cell research.
What do you think of President Obama's decision to increase federal dollars
for embryonic stem cell research?
Not exact matches
Yet the latter form, which is present some eight weeks after fertilization, is not only ethically unacceptable
for research but also far too old to yield
embryonic stem cells.»
The truth, of course, is that there are no human
embryonic stem - cell therapies even in clinical trial, let alone ready
for therapy, and there have been no major treatment....
Benedict argued that non-conjugal reproduction such as in vitro fertilization had created «new problems» ¯ the freezing of human embryos,
for instance, and the selective abortion of medically implanted embryos, together with pre-implantation diagnosis,
embryonic stem - cell research, and attempts at human cloning.
For instance, a strong resolution opposing
embryonic stem cell research, which destroys human lives, passed with 97 percent support.
research; since most of the reports have concentrated on justifying the creation of cloned human embryos
for research into and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, «
stem - cells» has become synonymous with «
embryonic stem - cells» in the public imagination.
Just don't try telling me tomorrow you are
for gay rights and
embryonic stem cell research and we'll both be consistent
Scientists looking
for new methods to make human tissue have successfully used cloning technology to create
embryonic stem cells from skin cells.
Attempts have been made to bridge this divide by proposing alternative sources of
embryonic stem cells
for research and therapeutic purposes.
For most in the scientific community, the debate was never truly about whether adult
stem cells or
embryonic stem cells would be the most useful therapeutically or whether we could obtain
embryonic - like
stem cells without destroying embryos.
However,
embryonic stem cells remain the «gold standard,» and studies of all types of
stem cells should continue in parallel
for the foreseeable future.»
Let us be thankful that a tool
for discrediting the pro-life movement (shaming us
for opposing magical cures promised by
embryonic stem - cell research) has itself been taken out of their hands.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has allowed a contract
for the dissemination of
embryonic stem cell lines approved
for US government funding to lapse, shuttering a key
stem cell bank, and doubling the price researchers pay
for samples of some human
embryonic stem cell (hESC) line... from $ 500 per vial of frozen cells to $ 1,000.
(i) a woman's right to an abortion; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls (and boys) against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (vi) gay marriage; (vii) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» Catholics; (viii) basic $ ex education
for older school children; (ix) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (x) population control; (xi) buying alcohol on a Sunday in many places; (xii) use of condoms and other contraceptives; (xiii)
embryonic stem cell research; (xiv) little 10 year - old boys joining organizations such as the Boy Scouts of America, regardless of the religious views of their parents; and (xv) gays being allowed to serve openly in the military.
Yet just such an unlikely resolution may be in hand
for one of the most acrimonious conflicts of recent times: the debate over human
embryonic stem cells....
Interestingly, none of the opponents of
embryonic stem cell research have called
for research programs that might increase the odds of embryo survival.
He decreed that the case brought by researchers Drs James Sherley and Theresa Deisher, along with a number of Christian groups including the Christian Medical Association, should be heard; and ordered an injunction temporarily blocking federal funding allocated
for human -
embryonic -
stem - cell research.
The increasing use of in - vitro - fertilisation techniques, and the emergence of new possibilities involving human cloning, mixing of human and animal genetic elements, and the use of
embryonic stem cells
for research, among other things, brought the need
for further teaching.
(In many ways it is worse than when John Edwards said in 2004 that if people voted
for John Kerry, people like Christopher Reeve would get out of their wheelchairs and walk from
embryonic stem cell therapies.)