Sentences with phrase «for epidemiologic»

Participants responded to 20 items about depressive symptoms in the past month (1 = rarely, 4 = most or all of the time; e.g., «I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me» and «I thought my life had been a failure»; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CESD]; Radloff 1977).

Depressive symptoms: Depressive symptoms were measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.

Gender bias in the measurement properties of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D)

During the initial assessment which occurred on school grounds, students completed a demographics form and the following questionnaires: (1) Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (Radloff 1977), (2) Adolescent Life Event Questionnaire — Revised (Hankin and Abramson 2002), and (3) the Perceived Control Scale for Children (Weisz et al. 1998).

Depressive symptoms were determined with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at each time point.

Participants completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire for DSM - IV, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, anxiety control subscale of Affective Control Scale, negative belief about worry subscale of Meta - Cognitions Questionnaire, and Nishida's psychological well - being scale.

As part of all 3 surveys, we used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D) to measure maternal depressive symptoms.

Maternal depressive symptoms were measured at discharge using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D; Radloff, 1977), a 20 - item self - report questionnaire of depressive symptoms rated on a 4 - point scale (0 = rarely / none of the time to 3 = all the time).

Results from this paper were presented as a poster at the 45th Annual Society for Epidemiologic Research Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 29, 2012.

Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES - D): results from a community - based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands

Depression (score ≥ 16 on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D); supplementary analyses also included people taking antidepressants).

Measures utilized include the Family Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (F - SADS), the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children - Epidemiologic (K - SADS), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES - D), the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM - D).

Measures used included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D), Conflict Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ), Kiddie - Sads - Present and Lifetime Version (K - SADS - PL), and the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).

Measures used included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES - D), Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Age Children (K - SADS - PL), the Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC), and the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).

Factorial structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression Scale among American Indian college students

Screening for depressive symptoms among older adults in Taiwan: Cutoff of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

The volunteers filled in a series of questionnaires: a relationship satisfaction inventory, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the Partner Phubbing Scale (yes, that really does exist — it was published last year).

Depressive symptoms can be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 9), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD), Beck Depression Inventory - 2 (BDI - II), and the PROMIS depressive symptoms measures.

Depressive symptoms were measured using the validated 10 - item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D)(Kohout et al. 1993; Radloff 1977).

Measures utilized include the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression scale (CES — D) and blood drawn samples.

Measures utilized include the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression scale (CES — D), the Perceived Competence Scale for Children, and the Children's Self - Control Scale.

Measures included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D), Beck Depression Inventory — II (BDI - II), Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM - IV (DIS - IV), Revised Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD - R), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Social Support Behaviors Scale (SSB), Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (SAS - SR), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the Strong African American Families (SAAF) on a subset of 167 families in which the primary caregivers demonstrated elevated levels of depressive symptoms at pretest as indicated by a score of 16 or higher on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression scale (CES — D).

Self - reported depressive symptomatology experienced by patients and spouses was measured with the 20 - item Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression Scale (CESD).

Maternal depression was measured with the abbreviated Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at baseline, preschool, and kindergarten.

Parents were assessed with the Family Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia.19 Teens were grouped into clinical groups based on their depressive symptoms and determination of DSM - III - R20, 21 diagnoses; details on all interviewed subjects are reported elsewhere.22 This analysis focuses on a medium depression group (n = 123 [25.9 %]-RRB-, which was called the subsyndromal group.12 These teens reported a previous depression episode or subdiagnostic levels of depressive symptoms that were insufficient to meet full criteria for a DSM - III - R affective diagnosis (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score, ≥ 24).16 Teens who met the criteria for the subsyndromal group and agreed to participate were randomized to receive either the prevention intervention program or usual care.

Secondary outcomes: anorexia nervosa symptoms (pooled Yale - Brown - Cornell Eating Disorder Scale, Eating Disorder Inventory, Anorectic Behaviour Scale, Body Shape Questionnaire and Eating Disorder Examination); depressive symptoms (pooled scores from Beck Depression Inventory, Personality Assessment Inventory Depression subscore and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) and anxiety (pooled scores from Beck Anxiety Inventory, Personality Assessment Inventory Questionnaire, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; side effects (akathisia, drowsiness / sedation).

Four dimensions of health - related quality of life were measured: general health (self - reported general health), physical health (absence or presence of functional limitations and illness symptoms), emotional health (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and Rosenberg's self - esteem scale), and a school and social functioning scale.

Recall of psychiatric history in cross-sectional surveys: implications for epidemiologic research

The instruments reviewed are: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ); the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression (CES - D); the Zung Self - Rating Depression Scale (SDS); the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ); and the Psychological General Well - Being Index (PGWB).

Depressive symptom measures were derived from both surveys using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale.

To determine the test characteristics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D) as a screening test for depressive and anxiety disorders in older adults.

A self administered questionnaire was used to screen participants and gather data on demographic variables, depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES - D]-RRB-, suicide (3 items added to the CES - D), life changes (a modified version of the Coddington Life Event Schedule for Adolescents), and family environment (Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scales).

* SES, socioeconomic status; CES - D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SRQ20, Self Reporting Questionnaire; CIDI, Composite International Diagnostic Interview; PSE, Present State Examination; Mini, Mini-Mental State Examination; CIS, Clinical Interview Schedule; DSM - III - R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised; DIS, Diagnostic Interview Schedule; GHQ, General Health Questionnaire; HOS, Health Opinion Survey; CIS - CV, Clinical Interview Schedule — Chinese Version; SADS, Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia; CPIS, Clinical Psychiatric Interview, Semistructured; DPAX, Depression and Anxiety; HDL, Health and Daily Living Form.

Measures of depression and depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI - II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ - 9)

These included characteristics on multiple levels of the child's biopsychosocial context: (1) child factors: race / ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian / Pacific Islander / Alaska Native), age, gender, 9 - month Bayley Mental and Motor scores, birth weight (normal, moderately low, or very low), parent - rated child health (fair / poor vs good / very good / excellent), and hours per week in child care; (2) parent factors: maternal age, paternal age, SES (an ECLS - B — derived variable that includes maternal and paternal education, employment status, and income), maternal marital status (married, never married, separated / divorced / widowed), maternal general health (fair / poor versus good / very good / excellent), maternal depression (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale at 9 months and the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview at 2 years), prenatal use of tobacco and alcohol (any vs none), and violence against the mother; (3) household factors: single - parent household, number of siblings (0, 1, 2, or 3 +), language spoken at home (English vs non-English), neighborhood good for raising kids (excellent / very good, good, or fair / poor), household urbanicity (urban city, urban county, or rural), and modified Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment — Short Form (HOME - SF) score.

Generalized estimating equations, accounting for repeated measures within subjects, adjusted for the child's age, sex, and race - ethnicity; family income - to - needs ratio; and maternal education, Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression score, and figure rating.

These methods have been primarily of 2 types: self - report measures of symptoms (eg, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale27) and structured interview protocols that identify specific disorders (eg, the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule28), which uses the criteria set forth in the DSM - IV.29 By far, the self - report measures are less time consuming and cheaper to administer; however, they do not provide a specific diagnosis.

Mothers reporting a high level of depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale score ≥ 16) reported significantly poorer prevention practices for car seat use, covering electrical plugs, and having syrup of ipecac in the home.

Measurements were two questions from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders patient questionnaire, both the long and short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, both the long and short forms of the Beck Depression Inventory, the Symptom - Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care, the Medical Outcomes Study depression measure, and the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D): results from a community - based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands.

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D) as a screening instrument for depression among community - residing older adults

Maternal depressive symptoms were measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D).

CES - D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression; ITNR, income - to - needs ratio.

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale had high sensitivity and specificity for major depression in older adults

Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales (CES - D): results from a community - based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands

While this approach is potentially very useful for an agency or community to assess their own problems and progress, it renders the data unfit for any epidemiologic tally or comparison.

This year, researchers from Stanford University used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide - Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) and found the exact same thing — dogs are still dangerous when we don't approach them the right way, and don't educate our kids about canine behavior.

Symptoms of depression decreased by 4 points (on the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) for people using the Internet intervention, whereas symptoms of depression increased by 3 points for people who were not using the intervention.

The Burnam scale includes 2 items from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and 6 items from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression Scale.