Founding partner William M. Shernoff is best known
for establishing case law in 1979 that allows plaintiffs to sue insurance companies for bad faith.
Founding partner William M. Shernoff is best known
for establishing case law in 1979 that allows plaintiffs to sue insurance companies for bad faith.
Not exact matches
«It's not infrequent grounds
for a reversal... but there is a well -
established case law on improperly selected juries.»
In Canada, the notion of plea bargains or immunity deals in exchange
for co-operation are well -
established in criminal
law in
cases facing individuals.
The situation in Europe, including Britain, is more nuanced than that in North America, largely because Europe's Muslim populations have a longer and more
established social and political history in nations where Muslims (of the theological left, right and center) are represented by sophisticated networks of» mosques and political NGOs that defend the rights of Muslims and shape their participation in civic life, including the introduction of Islamic
law for civil
cases.
The threat to this idea of secularism arises form religious fundamentalism which is afraid of insecurity through change in traditional religious dogmas, ritual practices of purity and impurity in social
laws; the threat also comes from communalism which seeks political power
for one's religious community or in the
case of Hindutva wants to
establish a Hindu state.
Case law (Phillips v Brown, Divisional Court [20 June 1980, unreported]-RRB- had already
established that a local authority might initially ask parents who were educating their children at home
for information.
This means that they are only subject to personal liability
for money damages in
cases where the meaning of the
law with respect to the situation in question is «clearly
established» which usually means that it involves a legal issue that has been resolved in a binding
case law precedent.
Left on the table from last session is a
law establishing a permanent special prosecutor
for cases involving civilian deaths at the hands of police.
5.3 All the people of Rep. of Cyprus (even the President of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus about an issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their
cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided
for in
Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been
established in that regard».
His
case, which is being supported by Dignity in Dying, hopes to
establish that the current
law is incompatible with the Human Right Act 1998, specifically with regard to Article 8 on the right to respect
for private and family life.
Putland could improve his argument, and thereby this answer could be improved, with reference to
cases where the separation of powers was
established in Australian
law (Arbitration Court's
case for example?)
A
case involving a member of the Woodstock Town Board has drawn attention to the local ethics
law, which seeks to
establish standards of conduct
for town officers, employees, and consultants, and to procedures followed by the volunteer board that administers and enforces the statute.
«
For the purposes of Your Lordship's record and because of the public interest that this
case seems to unnecessarily attract, our proposal was made in accordance with
established laws and there is no fixation on Section 270 of the ACJA.
The Tulsa team conclude that, in the US at least, and taking previous medical
case law as a template, it should be possible to
establish the framework
for a legal internet inoculation programme.
1912: NEA endorses Women's Suffrage 1919: NEA members in New Jersey lead the way to the nation's first state pension; by 1945, every state had a pension plan in effect 1941: NEA successfully lobbied Congress
for special funding
for public schools near military bases 1945: NEA lobbied
for the G.I. Bill of Rights to help returning soldiers continue their education 1958: NEA helps gain passage of the National Defense Education Act 1964: NEA lobbies to pass the Civil Rights Act 1968: NEA leads an effort to
establish the Bilingual Education Act 1974: NEA backs a
case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court that proposes to make unlawful the firing of pregnant teachers or forced maternity leave 1984: NEA fights
for and wins passage of a federal retirement equity
law that provides the means to end sex discrimination against women in retirement funds 2000s: NEA has lobbied
for changes to the No Child Left Behind Act 2009: NEA delegates to the Representative Assembly pass a resolution that opposes the discriminatory treatment of same - sex couple
The
case overturned the 1896
case of Plessy v. Ferguson in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in all its racist glory, claimed that state
laws establishing separate public schools
for black and white students were acceptable.
As is typical with any new
law, after passage of the ESSA, the federal agency responsible
for administration and oversight — in this
case, the U.S. Department of Education —
established regulations to make sure the intent of the
law was properly applied.
(d) In the
case of an alleged act or practice prohibited by this title which occurs in a State, or political subdivision of a State, which has no State or local
law prohibiting such act or practice, a civil action may be brought under subsection (a): Provided, That the court may refer the matter to the Community Relations Service
established by title X of this Act
for as long as the court believes there is a reasonable possibility of obtaining voluntary compliance, but
for not more than sixty days: Provided further, That upon expiration of such sixty - day period, the court may extend such period
for an additional period, not to exceed a cumulative total of one hundred and twenty days, if it believes there then exists a reasonable possibility of securing voluntary compliance.
By
law they can drop you on in most
cases if they can
establish that the property has been vacant
for more that 30 days.
With stocks markets around the globe, you may face, apart from language barriers, uncertain investor - protection
laws, and in some
cases a less pronounced commitment to openness, fairness and other qualities we tend to take
for granted in
established markets.
In summary, a strong
case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment
for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to
establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called
for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US
law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available
for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.
For years, Bryan Garner has favored the use of caselaw over
case law to describe precedent
established by judicial decisions.
Mary: Much of what I do in addressing legislative proposals is preventative, because the contractors» and subcontractors» industry groups are very active in pushing
for legislative remedies to principles
established by
case law in Washington State.
This contextualization with reference to Council voting patterns suggests that the Court of Justice in Opinion 2/15 did not intend to significantly change
established case law by proposing mandatory mixity
for agreements covered partly or entirely by shared competences.
(2) The judicial dicta in the
cases deciding the ambit and scope of the status of EU citizenship and rights contained therein has
established that the telos of the positive
law is to
establish a fundamental and autonomous status of equality
for all Member State nationals which guarantees a set of political and economic rights implemented via secondary legislation;
82 It should be noted at the outset that -LSB-...] the Commission took the view that, in order to
establish whether there was a guarantee
for individual claims, it was appropriate, after examining the national legislation and
case -
law (see first part of the second plea above), to begin by considering whether, in order to determine whether the procedure followed by a creditor of [the EICC] in order to settle its claim in the event of [the EICC] being in financial difficulty was comparable to that followed by the creditor of an undertaking subject to commercial
law.
The University of Mississippi
established a
law school in 1854, heavily influenced by the University of Virginia's model.203 Although dedicated to the idea that the theory of
law and government was a proper subject
for teaching, the University did not stint on moot court as a way to apply legal principles to
cases.204
The State's courts have shown no reluctance to strike punitive damage awards in
cases where punitive liability is not
established, so that defendant qualifies
for judgment on that issue as a matter of
law.
This conclusion effectively nullifies the line of
case law that suggested employees covered by the Canada Code, similar to unionized employees, could only be dismissed if the employer
established just cause
for doing so.
Corporate Vision magazine conducts annual research to identify
law firms that have demonstrated innovation, creativity, and lead the legal industry in processes, systems and procedures that have led the
law firm into expansion, achievements in its practice areas, has a progressive training program
for new employees, or has
established great outcomes in its
cases.
Acted
for Catnic Components in House of Lords
case establishing the test
for evaluation of patent infringement (the Diplock purposive construction test) still applicable under the new
law / EPC Article 69 and Protocol; EPC 2000
For the purpose of assessing legal advice privilege, UK
case law has
established that the «client» will not encompass all of a company's employees, or even the whole department or division seeking the legal advice, but instead a core «client team».
The Uber
case established that the company's drivers are workers
for employment
law purposes and not self - employed.
Be this as it may, the
case -
law continues to classify business practices in categories depending on their form, and this in turn determines the corresponding legal tests
for establishing whether the practices in question are abusive or legitimate.
The interesting part is here that the Court
established a set of criteria which — at least in my reading — seem to be destined to become benchmarks
for future
cases to
establish in a given situation whether Member States are «implementing» the
law of the EU and would thus be bound be EU fundamental rights.
Moreover, it would be an interesting addition to the analysis of the Deckmyn
case to draw a comparison with the ECtHR
case law which dealt with similar issues of balancing the copyrights and the right of freedom of speech (
for example the recent
case Ashby Donald and others v. France) and to
established ECtHR
case law on protection of political speech (which under the
established case law of ECtHR is given the highest level of protection).
The Court considers that under Article 5 (3) the «place where the harmful event occurred» is intended to cover both the place where the damage occurred and the place of the event giving rise to it, so that the defendant may be sued, at the option of the applicant, in the courts
for either of those places (
established case law since Case 21/76 Mines de Potasse d'Alsa
case law since
Case 21/76 Mines de Potasse d'Alsa
Case 21/76 Mines de Potasse d'Alsace).
Previous
case -
law of the Tribunal Constitucional had
established that the availability of such review was a condition
for surrender in
case of serious offences.
While the criminal justice system will work and fight
for justice on your behalf in most
cases, there remain some wrinkles in
established practices and
law that may obstruct efforts to seek justice in
cases involving sexual abuse crimes.
Some financial advisers and even lawyers may not be aware of these
cases because sometimes it takes time
for the principles
established by
case law to work its way into day - to - day practice.
A statute of limitations is simply a
law (or «statute») that
establishes a timeline
for lawsuits to be brought to court, and
cases that aren't filed before the deadline will be dismissed without being heard!
Case law has clearly
established that it is permissible
for a police officer who has a legitimate basis
for entering a driveway - such as seeing a driver driving erratically, and following the driver back to a destination to ensure they have arrived safely before detaining them - to do so.
Ron Mercaldo
established the Mercaldo
Law Firm in 1978
for the purpose of representing plaintiffs in serious injury and wrongful death
cases.
According to EPO
case law, in order to validly
establish priority
for subject matter in a first filing, the subject matter must be sufficiently disclosed, this usually means with enough data
for the claimed invention to be plausible.
The
case established that the ATS provides jurisdiction over tort actions in such «foreign cubed»
cases, brought by non-US plaintiffs against non-US defendants
for violations of customary international
law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, committed outside the US.
Although the vicarious liability provision does not apply to harassment in employment, there is long -
established case law of the Tribunal which supports that liability
for harassment by an employee can be imposed on an organization respondent where the harassing employee forms part of the «directing mind» of the organization respondent, on the basis of the «organic theory of corporate liability.»
From his base in New Brunswick, Eric proceeded to remedy this situation by
establishing the National Reporter System with
law reports in every province of Canada, including
for a time the short - lived Quebec Appeal
Cases.
The not
for profit publisher was
established in 1865 and they have 29
law reporters that cover
cases decided by the following courts and tribunals: the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council; the Court of Justice of the European Union; the Court of Appeal (Civil and Criminal Divisions); the High Court; the Court of Protection; the Employment Appeal Tribunal; the Upper Tribunal; the Court Martial Appeal Court; and the English ecclesiastical courts.
Our firm was
established by lawyers with extensive experience handling paternity
cases and other family
law matters
for people in Long Beach, Huntington Beach and the throughout Southern California.