Not exact matches
An opinion from the
ethics and lobbying
regulators at the Joint Commission on Public
Ethics found Lee would not have to reimburse the state
for rides on state aircraft as long as it is being used
for state business.
A group that pushed
for the education investment tax credit spent more than $ 5 million on the effort, according to a report from lobbying and
ethics regulators released on Thursday.
Cuomo sought and received approval
for the income from
ethics regulators.
The state GOP last week filed a complaint with
ethics regulators over Percoco's appearances in the governor's office in 2014 when he was in charge of Cuomo's re-election campaign and not working
for the state.
Catsimatidis in the radio interview with Talk 1300's Fred Dicker said he had not spoken to Cuomo about the bill and that it was his idea to contact
ethics regulators at the Joint Commission on Public
Ethics to receive approval
for the trip.
The Legislature in 2011 adopted an
ethics overhaul measure that required greater disclosure of sources of outside income
for state elected officials, as well as the creation of the latest lobbying
regulator, the Joint Commission on Public
Ethics.
A law approved in 2011 aimed at requiring more disclosure
for state officials who earn outside income from lobbying entities to appears to be rarely enforced by state
ethics regulators.
Ride - hailing firm Uber Technologies was the top lobbying spender
for the first half of 2017, a report released Wednesday by the
ethics and lobbying
regulators at the Joint Commission on Public
Ethics found.
Legislation: The appellant is a
regulator in Quebec that was pursuing an
ethics inquiry against a claims adjuster working
for the respondent.
For both application of existing rules and the promulgation of new ones, state
regulators are being guided somewhat by national bodies — mainly the American Bar Association — but as the world of legal
ethics evolves along with technology, there remains a need to consult local authorities on all
ethics rules.
However,
ethics regulators are doing more — much more — than punishing lawyers
for behavior brought on by their disabilities.
There are lots of potential issues any
ethics regulator might point to
for why disclaimers should not be upheld.
The employment mandates of the ADA are directed to employers with 15 or more employees, so a disabled lawyer working in a firm or a company is protected from discrimination
for his disability by the employer, but he is not employed by the
ethics regulators.
To respondents in
ethics investigations, it seems that
regulators view billing
for our time to make a living practicing our profession as disdainful conduct.
It stands to reason that the ADA comes up when lawyers with disabilities face charges from
ethics regulators for allegedly failing to meet their duties as attorneys.
For years, selling a law practice was prohibited because
ethics regulators believed clients, files, and a firm's good will were not something that could be sold.
So can a lawyer with a disability invoke the ADA when
ethics regulators impose discipline
for behavior that stems directly from the disability?
I worked
for a mandatory bar (a.k.a.
regulator) and the question came up about the
ethics of the billable hour.
However, as we previously wrote in an article
for the New York Legal
Ethics Reporter, these attempts have been met with significant resistance by bar
regulators and
ethics committees largely owing to the current state of the law and
ethics rules.
It seems an appropriate time
for those lawyers,
ethics committees, bar associations and legal
regulators who have an interest in how the cloud will serve the public interest as well as the needs of lawyers, clients and cloud developers to get involved and start looking at clouds from both sides now, both up and down, as it seems that, at this early point in its development, we really don't know the
ethics of clouds at all...
The hope of those lobbying
for statutes is to finesse these other issues, rarely discussed, with a statute blessing collaborative law, however practiced (mostly unseen by judges or
regulators or members of the public, in the shadow of their private «containers»), and thus create a done deal before the multitude of other
ethics problems come to light.
Proprietary vs. provincial codes of
ethics Prior to insisting on a mandatory
ethics course
for all licensees, a province's self -
regulator ought to first have fully articulated a distinct provincial code of
ethics.
It could be legally problematic
for a Canadian
regulator to compel a licensee to adhere to a professional code of
ethics owned and promoted by a trade association, but I understand the sentiments and frustrations of real estate professionals.
Ontario's Tom Wright, who is retiring as president / CEO after 17 years at RECO, told REM last month that some measures that
regulators provide, such as a code of
ethics for the profession, mandatory errors and omissions insurance and consumer deposit protection «provides the ability
for consumers to feel they can work with a real estate professional and do so with confidence.