Sentences with phrase «for evidence has seen»

Ursula Owusu's demand for evidence has seen Mr. Agyapong run off, tail in between legs, even as he recanted that he had not accused Ursula of corruption.

Not exact matches

The fact that all these supposed creations have been spotted (and then debunked) in Martian rock formations has done nothing to cool the Internet's ardor for seeing evidence of intelligent life on the red planet.

I have yet to see any evidence that labour market imperfections can be blamed for the bulk of rising wages, particularly for professions identified by the report such as «account manager» and «financial planner.»

U.S. News chief data strategist Robert Morse says he has seen no evidence of a Jesuit conspiracy in voting for the specialty rankings, but U.S. News hasn't probed the relatively high rankings of Jesuit schools in those rankings.

«It would be very prudent for the government to wait until we see if, in fact, there is evidence that what's happening down south in the U.S. is having a detrimental effect on Canadian business,» Perrault said.

And it is this abatement of the great distortions that have caused growth to slow so rapidly, and although we haven't seen much evidence of significant rebalancing yet, it should take a few years for the effects fully to be worked out.

Admittedly, a more conventional approach might have seen the Board ease policy more slowly, waiting for more evidence of economic weakness and moderation of inflation.

For example, when we have seen big moves in energy costs, such as the price of gasoline, there has been little evidence that consumers began to adjust their overall inflation expectations, either upward or downward.

Whilst the sector has traditionally been seen as a stepping stone on the way to long - term leases, the evidence suggests that the sector is now being seen as a long - term option with 39 % of businesses now staying in businesses centres for at least three years, an almost three-fold increase on 2014.

We're always open to evidence that would change our analysis of very long - term growth prospects for the U.S. economy, but that evidence evolves slowly enough that we could easily see another complete bull - bear cycle in the interim.

The pursuit of U.S. listings by Canadian pot producers is growing evidence of investor demand for access to a sector that has seen monumental growth over the past several months.

Research findings from the Center for Talent Innovation, a New York - based think tank headed by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, found that having something inherently in common with the funder, decision maker or investor makes an enormous difference, since 56 percent of decision makers in the study did not value ideas they didn't personally see a need for, even when evidence suggests that it's a good, marketable idea.

I do not, as I have stated, have any love for the religious fundamentalists in this country, but I do not see any evidence that supports your claim.

No there is a mountain of evidence for evolution: geographic distribution, tree of life, simpler organisms are older, inheritance, DNA, etc. and no evidence for creationism — unless you've seen a woman created from the rib of a man.

The evidence of Liberal mishandling has been there to see, for anyone willing to look.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

The fact that you, as a scientist, have seen more evidence for biblical events than for evolution is laughable.

As for not «seeing» evidence for evolution or the Big Bang, both of those scientific theories have been tested, and ample evidence has been found to support them.

It would have been sufficient for you to say that you do not believe in God; as you pointed out, you do not see any «evidence» of that.

no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)

If I didn't see evidence for God, I wouldn't believe either.

The people who could have reinforced my faith condemned me for daring to exercise it in the face of questions and conflicting evidence: not just encouraging me, but demanding me to believe that much harder in what I could not see.

God had four decades to give me some evidence he was out there, and he didn't, and I'm not going to go vandalize a church and end up in jail to see if what worked for you will work for me.

You said, «As I have pointed out, there are millions of people, including myself, who see evidence for God.»

I for one have never seen STRONG contradictory evidence that there is not a God.

- «As I have pointed out, there are millions of people, including myself, who see evidence for God.»

But sin in a believers life will also create seperation in their relationship with God, and we can see evidence of this in human examples for anyone who has ever been a parent.

Without the use of religion you'd have no reason to deny the evidence but as long as you have that book that you require to get by in this world, you will never see the facts for what they are.

If God exists and is all good, we must have evidence that all of the evil we see are for a higher purpose.

It was indeed, as we can see from the many readers who fail to take note of this evidence, a perilous decision for him to have made.

In addition to the significant biblical evidence that you gave for your position (a position which should be either accepted or proved wrong biblically), is one point that has come up in my study and that I have not seen mentioned anywhere.

An actual supernatural thing would, for us to interact with it in any way, be required to impinge upon this space - time continuum, and we see that, regardless of scale, i.e. microscopic or macroscopic, there is absolutely zero evidence that there is anything interacting with us or our universe in any way.

Okay I would like to see the evidence for that as well please.

Since we have evidence where our idea of rights comes from, and we can not see any such «god», to think this deity of yours is responsible for anything, is delusional.

There may be forms of existence that go beyond what we understand, but I have not seen any evidence of that despite hundreds of years of scientific tools and thousands of scientists available for the investigations of such claims and phenomena.

In fact atheists don't have an ideology — they see no evidence for the claims upon which your ideology is built.

as you've seen we all have the same evidence of God — it is there for all to observe all throughout His creation.

«Gabrielle Richards, who has attended New Birth for nearly eight years, said she has seen no evidence that Long is a se - xual predator.»

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

The country had seen a growing access to «quality art and design» as evidenced by such things as Michael Graves and Martha Stewart designing stuff for Target and Kmart.

Christians says faith is the evidence of things not seen but the die hard «the big bang is true» refuse to admit that all they have is evidence for the thing not seen thus making it a belief.

Because there are credible explanations for most of those objects and phenomenon based on science and I have seen no credible evidence for any supernatural being, God or otherwise.

But this immediately raises the question of the relationship between these two uses, necessary uses, as I see it, of the word «I.» It certainly does not seem to me that I have any empirical evidence whatsoever for holding that the «I» writing these words now, at this precise 1 / 10th of a second, is in any sense a different «I» from the «I» which started writing this paper some time ago.

To suggest that we haven't seen much evidence of evolution in the lab «for thousands of years» shows you don't understand the principles involved.

I've never seen any evidence for leprechauns.

I've never seen any evidence for unicorns.

when they wrote it and how life was when they wrote it, believe it or not, I have faith if you REALLY study the bible and all aspects of it, you will see its weaknesses... for those who believe are known for the lack of knowledge of there own faith, for those who are PROPERLY educated with open minds, quickly loose there faith when they are saturated with the false evidence that's abundantly around us each day..

When I say «I see no evidence for any God / gods and the evidence we do have proves a global flood did not occur as the bible claims» when asked by a believer why I don't believe, it might look very similiar to an anti-theist who is attempting to convince you to quit believing in God.

That is why we see evidence for Him in the things that He has made.

------------ I have already stated that evidence for God is seen in the things that are made.