Chicago Youth Call Out Charter Schools» Extreme Punishments After determining that Chicago charter schools have expulsion rates seven times that of their counterpart public schools (see factsheet), youth leaders of Voices of Youth in Chicago Education urged the state charter school commission to intervene and hold charter schools accountable
for exclusionary discipline practices.
Not exact matches
The law provides funding
for Youth PROMISE plans, which are aimed at reducing
exclusionary discipline practices.
The Appendix lists many recommendations
for policy and
practice, with the general theme of reducing the use of
exclusionary discipline (suspension and expulsion) and providing
discipline through positive approaches.
Finally, the letter contains a significant appendix of «illustrative» specific suggestions
for policy and
practice that could serve to help states and districts avoid violations, urging schools to reduce the use of suspension and other forms of
exclusionary discipline, focusing instead on positive approaches.
As of May 2015, 22 states and the District of Columbia had revised their laws in order to require or encourage schools to: limit the use of
exclusionary discipline practices; implement supportive (that is, nonpunitive)
discipline strategies that rely on behavioral interventions; and provide support services such as counseling, dropout prevention, and guidance services
for at - risk students.
Effective remedies to improve instruction, learning and school climate (including, e.g., decreases in bullying and harassment, use of
exclusionary discipline practices, use of police in schools, and student referrals to law enforcement)
for students enrolled are implemented in any school where the school as a whole, or any subgroup of students, has not met the annual achievement and graduation targets or where achievement gaps persist.
Reform of school
discipline to reduce
exclusionary practices and foster positive social, behavioral, emotional, and academic success
for students;
An unintended consequence of these policies and
practices was that youth with behavioral health needs were put at an increased risk
for exclusionary discipline and school - based arrests.
Ensure that the school's written
discipline policies provide
for alternatives to in - school and out - of - school suspensions and other
exclusionary practices (i.e., expulsions).
This is alarming because D.C. doesn't have a full picture of current in - school suspension, and if more schools start to substitute this
practice for out - of - school suspensions, there is a real risk of
exclusionary discipline persisting but obscured from view.
Pedro Noguera argues that
exclusionary discipline practices «effectively deny targeted students access to instruction and the opportunity to learn and do little to enable students to learn from their mistakes and develop a sense of responsibility
for their behavior» (2008, p. 133).
This disproportionality in
exclusionary discipline practices may contribute to the preschool to prison pipeline
for Black boys in particular.
Curbing Preschool Suspension and Expulsion:
Exclusionary discipline practices occur at high rates in early learning settings, and at even higher rates
for young boys of color.