Family Rights Group's response to the Home Office consultation on reforming support
for failed asylum seekers and other illegal migrants, September 2015
Slashing support
for failed asylum seekers shows the moral depths this government is operating in
Not exact matches
For asylum seekers it was «
failed».
New figures released today show the government has met its target on removing
failed asylum seekers for the past two months, with almost three - quarters of cases now decided in eight weeks, compared to 22 weeks in 1997.
Home Office officials are being rewarded with shopping vouchers
for helping to ensure
failed asylum seekers lose their attempt to stay in the country, new documents reveal.
Immigration Enforcement, an agency of the Home Office, is responsible
for tracking down illegal migrants, including those who have sneaked into Britain in the backs of lorries, arrived on visas but never went home and
failed asylum seekers who have avoided deportation.
In this context, the meaning of the term «genuine obstacle» is crucial: the more narrowly it is defined, the wider will be the category of destitute
failed asylum -
seekers who will be ineligible
for support.
However, the meaning of the term «genuine obstacle» — and so the extent of the category of destitute
failed asylum -
seekers who will be ineligible
for support — is not to be found anywhere in the Bill.
Aggressively against recent German immigration policy and the euro zone as it is currently known, AfD is mostly about preserving traditional German culture through measures such as immediate deportation
for failed asylum -
seekers.
The tribunal noted that the secretary of state had already given an undertaking (in March 2001) that he would not
for the time being enforce the return of any
failed Iraqi
asylum seeker either to or via territory controlled by the Iraqi government.
The decision of the High Court in R (Binomugisha) v Southwark LBC makes it difficult
for a local social services authority to refuse to accommodate a
failed asylum seeker who makes what purports to be a fresh
asylum or human rights claim to remain in the UK if: (i) the individual is one of the more vulnerable individuals who, as
asylum seekers, were accommodated by local authorities; and (ii) the purported fresh claim is not manifestly unfounded.
Last year, Ottawa amended the interim federal health program to reduce coverage
for most refugees and discontinue basic care to
asylum seekers from so - called «safe countries,
failed refugees and others sponsored by community groups such as churches to resettle here from overseas camps.