HHFKA provides funding
for federal school meal and child nutrition programs.
The National School Boards Association (NSBA) has issued a press release calling for flexibility and relief from the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to address the unintended consequences of onerous requirements
for federal school meal programs in the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act with the start of National School Lunch Week on Oct. 13.
Since 2000, the percentage of children eligible
for the federal school meals program has increased by 38 % — from 26 % in 2000 to 36 % in 2009.
Not exact matches
A self - deprecating NCAA is a welcome switch from the previously smug organization that has only been moved to meaningful action in the recent past by
federal court decisions (the ban on cost - of - attendance stipends became illegal once the NCAA got whipped in O'Bannon vs. NCAA) and terrible PR (Connecticut guard Shabazz Napier made the
schools look silly with their food rules by speaking out during a tournament that makes $ 770 million a year
for the NCAA in television revenue, hence the unlimited
meals rule change).
Investing more money in
federal school meal reimbursement, so
schools can afford to buy healthier food and pay
for the increased labor needed to prepare it;
-- we can not achieve the level of improvement we would like
for our kids without major changes to the whole
federal school meal program.
Yesterday First Lady Michelle Obama, accompanied by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, released the final
federal nutrition standards
for school meals, representing the first major overhaul of
school food requirements in over 15 years.
The new contract spells the end of the district's short - lived foray into the National
School Lunch Program, which provides
federal reimbursements in exchange
for offering healthy free or reduced - cost
meals to low - income students.
It is presenting these
meals under the supervision of the National
School Lunch Program, which provides
federal funding in exchange
for meeting certain requirements.
She works with Oregon
schools and other programs sponsoring the
School Breakfast Program, National
School Lunch Program, and other
federal meal programs
for children.
One important point in the piece:
federal funding
for school meals is highly unlikely to increase under Trump — and, indeed, it could well be slashed.
WITS is part of the First Lady's «Chefs Move to
Schools» planning team, so it was all the more surprising when the NYC DOE revoked authorization
for the program, claiming the WITS fresh, scratch - cooked
meals don't meet the new
federal school meal regulations.
And its conclusions make it all the more dismaying that the pending Child Nutrition Reauthorization in Congress does not include any meaningful raise in
federal funding
for school meals.
By increasing children's participation in
federal school breakfast and summer
meals programs, the No Kid Hungry North Carolina program could not only offer kids more food but also could garner more
federal funds
for the state, according to WRAL.
There is an obvious disparity between the funds made available by the
federal government to support free
meals for low - income students and the revenue collected by
school districts (from
federal «paid»
meal reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same
meals when served to children at higher income levels.
Understand the
federal guidelines
for procurement and the formal and informal processes
for procuring food
for school meal programs.
Federal reimbursements are not provided for such foods, but under current USDA policy, the federal reimbursements provided for school meals may be used to subsidize the costs of providing competitive
Federal reimbursements are not provided
for such foods, but under current USDA policy, the
federal reimbursements provided for school meals may be used to subsidize the costs of providing competitive
federal reimbursements provided
for school meals may be used to subsidize the costs of providing competitive foods.
[24] Since the
federal reimbursement
for a free
meal is $ 2.68 (see Table 1), the revenue generated by each paid
meal in these districts falls 61 cents short in elementary
schools and 27 cents short in high
schools, on average.
By placing some parameters on
school food budgets as part of reauthorization legislation, Congress could generate funds
for the
meals programs and ensure that
federal funds are spent on the purposes that it intends.
In 2006, the USDA required all
school districts receiving
federal funding
for school meals to create a wellness policy that addressed food - related policies, nutrition education, and physical activity.
When the
school lunch suppliers deliver contaminated
meals, the
federal government's recall system offers a flimsy safeguard
for children.
In these
schools, the combined average revenue
for paid
meals is $ 2.05
for elementary
schools and $ 2.42
for high
schools, and the
federal reimbursement
for a free
meal for the 2009 - 2010
school year is $ 2.68.
School districts have broad discretion over the use of the revenues they receive, including
federal reimbursements
for free and reduced price
meals.
It could do so by requiring
school districts that charge lower prices to increase prices gradually so that, when combined with the
federal subsidy provided
for such
meals, they eventually at least equal the
federal reimbursement level
for free
meals.
Whether or not Congress chooses to increase reimbursements, the first step to providing resources
for higher quality
school meals is to ensure that
federal reimbursements
for free and reduced price
meals are used
for their intended purpose — providing nutritious breakfasts and lunches to low - income
school children.
If you want all organic, GMO - free, clean - label, local, scratch - cooked
meals, you are going to have to help
schools lobby local, state and
federal decisions makers to provide more money
for school meals.
There is no regulatory requirement that
federal reimbursements
for free and reduced price
meals be spent only on those
meals or that records differentiate between the costs and revenues of the various aspects of the
school food program.
As explained below, two possible uses of
school food revenue — subsidizing paid
meals and providing competitive foods — raise concerns that low - income children may not be getting the full benefit of the
federal reimbursements intended
for those
meals.
-LSB-...] Nutrition Association, an organization of 55,000 professionals, has asked Congress (albeit half - heartedly)
for a 35 cent increase in
federal school meal reimbursement.
Financed by a three - year, $ 40 million
federal allocation, Team Nutrition is designed to help
schools change to healthier
meals, improve nutrition education
for children and their families, and provide state - of - the - art training and technical assistance
for food - service personnel.
The loss of
federal funds has stung city
school officials, who started the program with the idea that they would get
federal money to help pay
for the free
meals, which are being served from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at various elementary
schools during the strike.
In particular, they shared successful tactics to enhance the flavor and excitement
for school meals, while still providing healthy food that meets
federal USDA guidelines.
Every district participating in the
federal meals program is required to have a written policy that includes nutrition guidelines
for all foods available at
school (hello, birthday cupcakes!)
Learn more about what today's students are looking
for on their
school lunch menus, and get an overview of participation trends in
federal school meals programs.
I get it that JO has brought more attention to the
school food issue, but it is so often the wrong kind of attention, the kind that seeks to blame those lowest on the food chain — the cafeteria ladies, the local
schools, the local nutrition director —
for problems which are coming from the top — the criminally low
Federal funding that forces
schools to rely on cheap processed food; the thicket of government regulation which must be followed no matter how senseless, and hoops which must be jumped through to get the pitifully low reimbursement; the lack of ongoing
Federal funds to pay
for equipment repair or kitchen renovation, forcing
schools to rely on preprocessed food instead of scratch cooking, unless they can pass the hat locally to pay
for a central kitchen to cook fresh
meals.
And I know that
schools have huge incentives
for having more kids on the list to receive the free
meals as that allows them more
federal funding.
TLT: The Senate bill would strengthen and broaden the verification process
for families seeking
federal school meal assistance.
Though there is a nearly two - year - old state mandate that opens the free summer lunch program to all children in Illinois — whether or not they're in summer
school — there has not been much improvement in participation, and officials say millions of
federal dollars available
for the
meals are going untapped.
The
federal government reimburses states and
schools for the cost of the
meals, and any
school or qualified community agency can use these programs to ensure that no child goes hungry.
Eleanor Su of California Watch published a piece late last week reporting that 60 % of California
schools reviewed in the last five years failed to meet at least one
federal nutritional requirement
for school meals, with some
schools significantly out... [Continue reading]
If districts selling deep fried snacks are caught doing so in a
school food audit, they will have to pay back their
federal meal reimbursements
for each day the violations occurred.
FNS oversees, among other
federal feeding programs:
school breakfast and lunch; daycare
meals (via the Child and Adult Care Food Program); SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as Food Stamps); and WIC (the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program
for Women, Infants and Children).
The number of students who qualify
for a free or discounted
meal based on income levels also matters because
schools and entire
school systems may qualify
for grants and other
federal funding based on the reported level of need among students.
lRaise the
federal reimbursement by 6 cents per lunch
for school districts that comply with new
meals standards to be issued by the Agriculture Department.
The bad is that fewer than one in five children eligible
for the program nationwide use it - 2 million a day last summer, compared with the 12 million who get free or reduced - price
meals during the
school year, according to
federal estimates.
But if a parent chooses to let their child eat
school meals, he or she has effectively consented to the
federal government's nutriton standards
for that
meal.
-LSB-...] options
for school food — the
federal school meal program and an a la carte menu — has been shown to create painful stigma among kids who must,
for financial reasons, rely on the
school meal.
Yet,
for all its faults, the
school meal program is one of the most successful
federal social endeavors of all time, right up there with Medicaid and Social Security.
While you were served a
meal of meatloaf, mashed potatoes, peas and carrots and a canned pear half, today's children (if they have the financial means) can pay
for a
meal of processed «kid fare» which has to meet only the most minimal
federal standards — chips, ice cream, and (particularly if they're in secondary
school) items like brand - name pizza, breaded chicken sandwiches, Rice Krispie Treats and slushies.
When the worst happens and
school lunch suppliers deliver contaminated
meals, the
federal government's recall system offers a flimsy safeguard
for children, the Tribune found.