Thus in the fall of 1979, [following the decision in Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 963 v. New Brunswick Liquor Corporation (1979), 79 CLLC 26 14,029 (S.C.C.)-RSB- the Board could give ascendance to its objective of creating a better climate for labour relations problem solving at its hearing by discontinuing recording and avoiding the formality and regard
for form over substance that accompanied recording.
Don't settle
for form over substance.
Not exact matches
Ultimately, the inter-connectedness of reality and
form takes primacy
over the Cartesian preference
for substance and quality in Whitehead's philosophy (PR xiii).
Left environmentalists lobbied and praised BP and Enron
for putting
form over substance.
-LSB-...] Bradley, CEO and founder of the Institute
for Energy Research, said: «BP put
form over substance and took their eye off the ball» and called «Beyond Petroleum» -LSB-...]
Preoccupation with
form over substance combined with denial and avoidance behavior are the chief causal factors
for human failure — from the individual and family right up to the national level.
If you are a regular follower, you have probably seen these before, but two of my recent essays have been published and are now available
for free download and citation: The Unfortunate Triumph of
Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law (2012) 50:2 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 317.
The first takeaway
for employers with labour pains is that
substance will prevail
over form; notwithstanding calling some workers «independent contractors» they likely are «employees.»
The lower courts» decisions in this case always seemed to me to be too pure
for real life,
form over substance.
For the majority, the Appellant was really making a complaint of form over substance — that the Appellant was not in fact prejudiced by the Respondent's failure to file and serve a formal notice of application for the summary dismissal (although, at para. 17, the majority accepts that in some circumstances, prejudice may be caused to the opposite part
For the majority, the Appellant was really making a complaint of
form over substance — that the Appellant was not in fact prejudiced by the Respondent's failure to file and serve a formal notice of application
for the summary dismissal (although, at para. 17, the majority accepts that in some circumstances, prejudice may be caused to the opposite part
for the summary dismissal (although, at para. 17, the majority accepts that in some circumstances, prejudice may be caused to the opposite party).
We are unwilling to fortify the armory of those who attack the law as famous
for its ability to elevate
form over substance.
* While the procedural rules must of course be observed, the need to achieve the right result
for that person requires an emphasis on
substance over form.
Remember, you are looking
for a job and with resumes it is always
substance over form.