Not exact matches
«I hear fearful voices calling
for building walls and distancing people they label as others,
for blocking
free expression,
for slowing immigration, reducing trade and, in some cases around the world,
even cutting access to the internet,» Zuckerberg said during a Facebook conference in April.
Extending this thematic, new nightlife pictures present underground club venues frequented by the artist as sanctuaries
for free expression and
even protest, offering a subtle counterpoint to the flood of uniform party pictures that now clutter social media.
It presages a law captured by the rhetoric of the right to freedom of
expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise of that right; a law in which, under the guise of the right to freedom of
expression, the «right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral concept of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the right to freedom of
expression trumps — or tramples upon — other rights and values which are the vital rights and properties of a
free and democratic society; a law to which any number of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and
even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action
for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their right to freedom of
expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations of citizens in a
free and democratic society; and a law marked by a lack of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised society.
Even in a free and democratic society we understand that there are reasonable restrictions on expression, even in places where expression and inquiry are used for the purposes of learn
Even in a
free and democratic society we understand that there are reasonable restrictions on
expression,
even in places where expression and inquiry are used for the purposes of learn
even in places where
expression and inquiry are used
for the purposes of learning.
The EFF also asserts that bad patents threaten
free expression by allowing the patent holder to threaten anyone using the technology
for any purpose, whether or not the use causes any harm to the patent holder, is used
for non-commercial purposes, or the user had any idea they were
even...