Sentences with phrase «for free speech against»

More publicity for jury nullification - this time on News 13 in central Florida: Group fighting for free speech against Judge Belvin Perry Video of interview with James Cox is here.

It is so easy for us all to stand up for free speech against terrorist murderers.

Not exact matches

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

I love free speech but, those in positions of authority who advocate hate, bigotry and acts of violence against others should be held criminally accountable for what they say.

Occupy Wall Street was a gim me issue for progressives around the city and the world, but in the neighborhood surrounding Zuccotti Park, it was a thorny situation in which free speech and assembly rights had to be balanced against the need of residents not to be disrupted, and Menin led the effort to forge a compromise resolution at C.B. 1.

«When our government criminalizes the very free speech that the First Amendment was written to protect, sends people to prison for simply exercising their constitutional rights, and wields its power like a weapon against political enemies, we are all in trouble.»

Which could probably conflict with EU rules for the rights of minorities / free speech / political activities, but it is not the same than «death threat against a national minority».

You only speak for yourself and I don't want regulating by you, the PCC or legislation because I believe in free speech tempered only by laws against inciting violence and defamation.

Trump's penchant for threatening legal action against journalists who write critically about him is proving to be a powerful example for free speech advocates who want a federal law against using the courts to bully speakers, experts said.

The accusations against Paladino in the Buffalo School Board's petition do not include his remarks about the Obamas, but the Buffalo businessman has brought them up in his defense for allegedly leaking the teacher negotiation details, saying it's part of a conspiracy to deny him his first amendment rights for free speech under the US Constitution.

He argues that they are retaliating against him for comments he made last December about former President Barack Obama and his wife, thereby violating his right to free speech.

The accusations against Paladino in the Buffalo School Board's petition do not include his remarks about the Obamas, but the Buffalo businessman has brought them up in his defense for allegedly leaking the teacher negotiation details, saying it's part of a conspiracy to deny him his first amendment rights fo free speech under the US Constitution.

I am all for the free speech but slanderous statements and character assassination are not a free speech but another act of victimization against the ones who are unable to defend themselves.

Americans of all political preferences would rise up against such tyranny if their rights were squelched by corporations, yet teachers unions have been legally trampling the free - speech rights of teachers throughout our nation for decades through forced dues used to fund their one - sided political agendas.

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Herbert The Animal Legal Defense Fund, along with PETA, filed the nation's first lawsuit against ag gag legislation, taking Utah to court for infringing on the free speech rights of activists, investigators, and journalists by criminalizing undercover investigations at factory farms.

And in regards to the efforts of Rudy Giuliani, Cotick wants, ``... to thank Mayor Giuliani, who has dedicated his life to the protection of citizens against terrorists like Manuel Noriega and today for defending free speech.»

I'm all for punishing shitty sites by giving them less revenue, but I think bans are totally against free speech.

According to the group, Sony has committed an «offense against free speech and internet freedom» by «deny [ing] consumers the right to use products they have paid for, and rightfully own, in the manner of their choosing,» essentially «renting [their] products.»

I'm not against the use of Mortal Kombat footage for hilarity purposes (and I thought that this «Floridal Kombat» segment was very funny), but I do think it's odd for The Daily Show to cite Mortal Kombat as an example of a game that is so distasteful that it should invalidate the medium's free speech protection while also using the same game for its comedy needs.

It is an affront to our First Amendment rights of free speech and association for Attorney General Walker to bring such intimidating demands against a nonprofit group,» said CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman.

WUWT featured guest commentary by Tim Ball, who said that the recent dismissal of a lawsuit brought against him by climate scientist Andrew Weaver was «a victory for free speech and a blow against the use of the law to silence people.»

~ If you'd like to support Mark's pushback against the climate enforcers, you can do so by buying his free - speech book, a showtune or two, a SteynOnline gift certificate, or one of our many other fine products, For North American telephone orders, please call toll - free from the United States and Canada [phone] between 8 am and 3 pm Eastern Monday to Friday.

~ If you'd like to support Mark's pushback against Dr Mann by buying his free - speech book or our Steyn vs the Stick exclusive trial merchandise or a SteynOnline gift certificate, which can be redeemed for Mark's new book later this year, please visit the Steyn store.

~ We're continuing to prepare for trial, both for Mann's defamation suit against me for calling his stick «fraudulent», and my countersuit against him for his chilling effect on free speech, a chilling effect that, as we saw, now reaches all the way to elderly Swedes across the ocean.

The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), represented by David Rothbard, was among 22 groups represented in a «Coalition» open letter pushing back against what the Heartland Institute describes as an «affront to free speech.»

It is a victory for free speech and a blow against the use of the law to silence people.

The fossil fuel industry has responded to these suits by fiercely waging a campaign that claims that any legal action against the fossil fuel companies for funding organizations engaged in climate change denial activities is tantamount to a legally inappropriate suppression of free speech (See: Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing doubt).

For example, in the United States, Hulk Hogan's widely reported lawsuit against Gawker raised a number of issues quite apart from the merits of the case (privacy rights vs. free speech).

This is unlike the United States where over half the States have specific anti-SLAPP legislation and First Amendment rights to free speech that provide rules for the better protection of the right to protest and speak out against government agencies and corporations.

Far too often, I hear voices calling for genocide against members of certain faiths and regions of the planet without the corresponding denunciations to be satisfied that speech can be as free as it ought to be.

In the annals of First Amendment jurisprudence, the Supreme Court's 1927 opinion Whitney v. California is known for its concurrence by Justice Louis Brandeis in which he wrote an eloquent defense of free speech while joining in a decision against it.

Continuing on his meme of a few weeks ago, blogfather Volokh takes a long look at Sweden's incomplete protection for free speech (in this case, a «hate speech» against homosexuality), and provides a little historical perspective for a logic - based (and refreshingly non-PC) reality check:

As the debate over Farrow's piece expanded on Twitter, sociologist Zeynep Tufekci — an expert in the impact of social - media on conflicts such as the Arab Spring revolutions in Egypt and the more recent demonstrations in Turkey — argued that even free - speech considerations have to be tempered by the potential for inciting actual violence against identifiable groups:

In his piece, Farrow acknowledges that there are free - speech issues involved in what he's suggesting, but argues that «those grey areas don't excuse a lack of enforcement against direct calls for murder.»

The peak professional group for Australia's media questions the government's «free speech» motivations for the RDA inquiry, arguing that it occurred against a backdrop of much graver threats (many directly due to government legislation), including:

New Jersey's highest court has considered whether state constitutional protections for free speech apply to a private homeowners» association enforcement of its rules and regulations against fellow homeowners.

The California case, H - CHH Associates v. Citizens For Representative Government, dealt with a mall owner's effort to require groups seeking a free speech forum to obtain insurance that would protect the mall against any mishaps.