We will advocate for legal checks and balances in the privacy Armageddon circa 2018, albeit we do so as a group that has fought
for free speech for over half a century.
Not exact matches
A number of the users whose accounts were limited after this feature was being tested complained that their
free -
speech rights were being restricted
for no reason, just because they used a specific word.
In the past, Twitter has trumpeted its status as the «
free -
speech wing of the
free -
speech party,» the service responsible
for helping topple dictators in Egypt and Libya.
Twitter has often boasted about its commitment to the principles of
free speech, sometimes leading to criticism from those who felt the company was more interested in tolerating all forms of
speech than in trying to ensure a harassment -
free experience
for its users.
Wednesday's
speech from the throne, which included a promise from the federal government to institute a pick - and - pay system where consumers would be
free to choose only the channels they want, has drawn a lot of flak from media commentators
for being short on details, silent on major issues and overly populist.
Google is now positioning itself as a champion of
free speech, a tricky claim
for Microsoft to make as it continues to censor search results.
May's
speech outlines how the U.K. wants to exit the EU's single market, which allows
for free movement of goods, services and people.
In her
speech, May said: «The best way to raise living standards
for all is through economic growth based on
free enterprise, operating in inclusive, fair and open rules - based markets.»
«They're being punished
for the exercise of
free speech by CNN.
In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attack, publications in Russia, China and Malaysia — all of which have been criticised
for suppressing
free speech — said the magazine was wrong to lampoon Islam.
One user from California noted,» [It's] not cool to sue customers simply
for writing a review,» while another from Massachusetts said, «When you sue your customers
for voicing their dissatisfaction in a public setting, you're attempting to stifle
free speech.»
An employee does not have
free reign [sic] to engage in political
speech that disrupts the workplace, but punishing an employee
for deviating from company orthodoxy on a political issue is not allowed either.
A
free - trade segment of his
speech focused on his proposal
for the «Reagan Economic Zone of Prosperity,» a vaguely - defined multilateral agreement that would promote
free trade and punish the «cheaters,» particularly China.
While the terrorist attacks in France have dominated the headlines this week, advocates
for free speech are fighting a war on multiple fronts.
«
Free speech is not as free as all that in the real world, where there are numerous social repercussions for behaving in a rude, obscene and appalling manner,» she wri
Free speech is not as
free as all that in the real world, where there are numerous social repercussions for behaving in a rude, obscene and appalling manner,» she wri
free as all that in the real world, where there are numerous social repercussions
for behaving in a rude, obscene and appalling manner,» she writes.
As Adam Liptak has explained, these older media companies financed many of the major
free speech fights of the 20th century; they saw paying
for litigation as part of their business model, and as a public duty.
For all his talk about principles like openness and
free speech, his leadership is better viewed as a balancing of constituencies, a reality familiar to any politician.
In acting this way, Chick - fil - A is setting an example
for other companies, and contributing to an overall pattern that is liable to have a chilling effect on
free speech and entrepreneurship.
While it speaks volumes that many Americans value their right to
free speech, this does not mean that we have to pay
for their vitriol.
The tabloid is fighting
for an important
free speech principle and is pointing out, correctly, that celebrities like Hogan should not be able to use the media when it suits them and shut it down when it doesn't.
This comedy became a beacon
for free speech advocates and even President Barack Obama.
For the most part, the courts have sided with them, enshrining
free speech as one of the country's most protected laws along the way.
This is why I have simple rules
for blog articles,
free speeches, dinner invites and much more.
More important, it's a major victory
for the suppression of
free speech.
I can not afford the time to consider whether to write an article
for some blog or not, whether to do a
free speech or not or whether to accept a dinner invitation or not.
So twitter, a company that can never shut up about how they stand up
for free speech, kowtowed to the NFL.
But the consequences remain the same, important voices
for free speech have been silenced in the places where they are needed the most.»
That's what makes this moment so exceptional, especially
for the tech brands that live in the eye of the
free speech hurricane.
In the
speech that urged the Alliance to embrace social conservatives, Harper also said that left - wing Canadians stand
for «radical, responsibility -
free individualism» and «tribalism in the form of group rights.»
As blame fell to Facebook
for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool
for operating in China escaped, triggering questions about its respect
for human rights and
free speech.
In his
speech, Trump argued
for the economic benefits of increased energy production, saying it would create jobs and
free money to invest in infrastructure.
For precisely the same reasons that I found your statement to be laughable, the government must insure that mechanisms are put in place to insure that the actual persons granted
free speech rights by the Supreme Court (the owners of the corporations) are the ones actually exercising their new rights instead of having those rights stolen by fat - cat executives and self - appointed boards.
There have been rumblings,
for example, that Germany's hate
speech law goes too far in clamping down on
free speech.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter
for Breitbart News covering issues of
free speech and online censorship.
That means Facebook deletes calls
for violence or slurs that may be protected
free speech in the U.S. under the First Amendment.
Demonstrators gathered near the University of California, Berkeley campus amid a strong police presence and rallied to show support
for free speech and condemn the views of Ann Coulter and her supporters.
Cultivating relationships with other nonprofit organizations, including those focused on environmental, global hunger, public health,
free speech, and food safety issues, to build alliances and support
for the policies that will be most effective at increasing plant - based options and readying the path to market
for clean meat.
His ban from visiting Britain in June 2009 has made him the «poster child»
for free speech, not only
for Americans concerned about the cultural shift towards totalitarianism and their rights to freedom of expression, but
for people around the globe.
If the federal and state governments come in and slap new regulations and oversight on these companies, it's their own fault
for practicing elitist arrogance in an attempt to shape a specific narrative that damages the very fabric of a society where the first amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the rights of
free expression and
free speech.
Constitutional Amendment 1: «Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government
for a redress of grievances»
Facebook doesn't like to decide what kind of rhetoric is appropriate or inappropriate
for fear of encroaching on its users»
free speech rights.
But the two leaders did not take questions from reporters, a win
for Xi, who oversees an authoritarian system that has sought to sharply limit
free speech and press freedoms.
Well, if you're a tech company, then it's much easier to regulate your product without worries about infringing on
free speech and freedom of the press, particularly if it can be proven that Facebook is bad
for mental health and perhaps even
for democracy.
I mentioned the ninth amendment
for one reason, one can not use ones
free speech to disparage the right of
free religion of another.
You are probably
for free speech as long as the questions that are asked don't make you uncomfortable?
This is indeed a victory
for free speech.
The issue is that
free speech was provided
for anti choice proponents, but an alternative plate giving the same right to
free speech to pro choice proponents was voted down by the legislature.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation
for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if,
for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of
speech, interfered with the
free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»
Critics argue the law suppresses
free speech and makes South Korea like its northern counterpart, known
for its human rights abuses and oppression of religious and political minorities.