Sentences with phrase «for harm to others»

For boys, externalizing responsibility for harm to others was related to using physical aggression in romantic relationships and lower levels of guilt and shame were related to the justification of sexual aggression.

If your home is under construction, or if you have a landscaping project under way, you can be liable for harm to others if you have not put any measures in place to protect visitors from being harmed by the equipment and tools.

Not exact matches

Other industries have already figured out how to handle liability for products that can cause harm

As the DOJ's complaint against the merger argues, the resulting conglomerate might «use its control of Time Warner's popular programming as a weapon to harm competition» by raising the prices it charges other cable networks for Time Warner entertainment or limiting distribution of content from other producers.

To use a concrete example, if you have a million bucks socked away for retirement, drawing down $ 30,000 a year (in addition to any other sources like Social Security or pensions) is a conservative enough choice that you should be able to sleep at night, confident that even extreme swings in the market won't harm your ability to keep your portfolio healthy into your ninetieTo use a concrete example, if you have a million bucks socked away for retirement, drawing down $ 30,000 a year (in addition to any other sources like Social Security or pensions) is a conservative enough choice that you should be able to sleep at night, confident that even extreme swings in the market won't harm your ability to keep your portfolio healthy into your ninetieto any other sources like Social Security or pensions) is a conservative enough choice that you should be able to sleep at night, confident that even extreme swings in the market won't harm your ability to keep your portfolio healthy into your ninetieto sleep at night, confident that even extreme swings in the market won't harm your ability to keep your portfolio healthy into your ninetieto keep your portfolio healthy into your nineties.

For the vast majority of all other companies, however, we do not have (and probably do not want the kind of) the brand equity with our customers to allow us to wear pajamas in a professional environment, so it could greatly harm the value we are trying to convey.

Johnson was «not acutely at risk for harm to self or others,» according to a medical record from a visit on Aug. 15, 2014.

However, as consistently working long hours is a pretty terrible idea for lots of other well established reasons (assuming your family is in a financial position to avoid it), there's probably no harm in adding one more possible drawback to the pile.

But under US trade law and WTO rules, it's fair game for America (and other countries) to slap tariffs on underpriced imports from certain companies if they can prove it's harming local industries.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if Thing Daemon believes in its discretion that your sale or any products, services, content or other materials in the listing or on Thing Daemon's servers may create liability for Thing Daemon or harm other users of the Services, then you agree that Thing Daemon may take any actions with respect to the content or materials or listing that Thing Daemon believes are prudent or necessary to minimize or eliminate our potential liability or to protect other users of our Services.

It is so sad that Islam is marked today by terrorists that I can tell you for sure they are NOT Muslims by any means; any one who harms any person or thinks of destruction to others is simply not a Muslim — Islam = Peace and not hate and those who practice islam as God want to be practiced know that God sai «Love for your brother what your love for thy self».

It does not mean settling for what's second best because a group of people, the majority of which are not willing to make the ultimate sacrifice of putting themselves in harm's way for others, are thinking about themselves as individuals and putting that ahead of the majority best interests.

All I can say is one day God will will and we all will be judged for the people we hurt and judge, but one thing I can be sure of is that when it comes to respecting people of other faiths I will not have blood on my hands for harming Gods children.

I'm all for letting you live your religious life as long as you don't harm others, but your religion contains words from your «god» that command harm to others.

I think that there will be some initial tears for those who have not recognised the harm they have done to others in this life and before everlasting joy is granted our unrepented sins (ie the failure to recognise, admit and change our minds about our weaknesses that hurt others I this life) are laid bare and the full depravity of our own soul is known to us.

Agree mankind brain is his computer and in order for this computer to work it requires all the other working physical systems and senses... this computer is programed as to when it should stop working naturally but man shortened the life of that time given by destroying their health or risking their physical body into physical harm...

If it's working for this family, and others: WONDERFUL... if it's not your choice: WONDERFUL... but what gives others the right to judge someone else's choices as right or wrong if they are not harming others in the process?

It is one thing to believe in the delusional tenets of religion, but to to believe that anybody can survive death is to reject reality for a belief system that should land one in a funny farm where that person can pose no harm to himself or any other person.

One small example of this in our neighborhood is the urban farm one of my friends and mentors started to provide jobs to «returning citizens»: It required the city to help give away land and clear vacant property and some startup capital from a local farming company, but it is based on the church's understanding of the needs of the people and explicitly tied to the concept that faithful believers can help disciple and encourage people who have been incarcerated for harming others, walking them through the transformative process.

To be aware that we harm others, to establish ideals to live by personally, and to feel guilt for not living up to those ideals are things shared by all religionTo be aware that we harm others, to establish ideals to live by personally, and to feel guilt for not living up to those ideals are things shared by all religionto establish ideals to live by personally, and to feel guilt for not living up to those ideals are things shared by all religionto live by personally, and to feel guilt for not living up to those ideals are things shared by all religionto feel guilt for not living up to those ideals are things shared by all religionto those ideals are things shared by all religions.

But even when we do feel justified in criticizing those within the church, Paul is not providing a license for us to do them bodily harm, or even to slander them to others.

The dangers for fostered codependency and harm to others that may result from that are being showcased in this thread.

He is just... great; He loves and cares about your heart far more than he cares about your deeds (the reason for his warning against bad deeds is that they can open a door to our enemy and harm us in other ways — that «s all!

This planet, the level of harm and exploitation, the fact that the suffering of other creatures is needed for carnivores (many humans) to live tells me that those consciousnesses are not any more interested in answering the prayers of humans than the symbiotic bacteria that help us get by in our bodies.

He decided to follow the religion of christ but does he know what is teaching of this religion obviousley no it teaches love and care for others and not harm others by burning their book, I don't mind if he burns his own holy book in private if he thinks it's the right thing to do.

I can point to this as grounds for accusing the biblical deity of immoral behavior, e.g. I would not unnecessarily harm another person's other wise innocent children because I would not want anyone (mortal or deity) to unnecessarily harm my own children.

He talks about the «goodness as we possess» (such as altruistic acts) and says that even if religion did no other harm, its carefully nurtured divisiveness is enough to make it «a significant force for evil in the world.»

I would never vote to ban something for no other reason than I think it is wrong, unless of course people are being harmed in someway.

I don't think God is going to fault me for taking steps as an adult to protect other innocents from harm.

If, on the other hand, the fantasies are used as cause to harm others, or to stop people from seeking truth, then I pity those lost fools and I cry for humanity.

Eliminating these false negatives (being careless when others are trying to harm you and ignoring them as random events) is crucial for survival, and hence the instinct.

There will always be people willing to harm others for profit or personal satisfaction.

how much harm this causes... to yourself and others, think for yourself...

1) They are consenting to an act that does not harm another; and 2) These radical Christians aren't advocating for people to be killed for the aforementioned harmful crimes, yet want people put to death for loving each other.

I would urge anyone reading this to take WHATEVER ACTIONS POSSIBLE to harm Chick - Fil - A personnel or property, Dan Cathy, other members of the Cathy family, Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Michelle Bachmann, Antonin Scalia, Billy Graham, or their loved ones, to make them pay for the harm they are doing to the people they discriminate against.

The penitent Christian confesses one's sins to a priest or in community, regrets the evil, promises to sin no more, to avoid occasions of sin and make amends for the harm inflicted on others by the sins committed.

Religion is for people who care only for themselves, and never think about how they are harming others by giving money to these crooks.

It is crucial for us to understand that the child of faith will not be harmed «if the body is clothed in secular dress, dwells in unconsecrated places, eats and drinks as others do, does not pray aloud, and neglects to do all those «religious» things which some decree... one thing, and one thing only is necessary for us to know righteousness, life and freedom.

Another point heavily stressed in the Integrity Therapy approach is restitution for harm done to others.

The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.

As long as a person is happy with their belief; and are not harming others, then they should have right to not only follow their belief but also protection from persecution for their belief.

It appears that you have seemed to have worked out a way for you personally, and you are advocating the same for others, of finding a balance of understanding and tolerance, while also being careful of groups of people that have ideologies that promote harm to those that are not part of these groups.

It is for those who are too weak to accept the reality that: (1) there isn't a being who will make sure, in the end, justice is served to those who cause harm and suffering to other humans, (2) there is a powerful being who will take care of us, (3) our lives have a purpose beyond us, (4) we are alone.

I embrace the idea that I can not know the answer, and in doing so, it makes it easier for me to embrace all religious viewpoints (so long as they are not trying to harm others).

Yes parents need to be diligent in making sure that they're children are out of harms way, but for you to even suggest that parents had the responsibility of warning other parents and congregations is absolutely IDIOTIC.

However, there seems to be a general consensus among Christians that the civil government has a general duty and obligation to establish order within society for the purpose of protecting its citizenry from physical harm intentionally inflicted by others.

Sometimes, an instrument or tool which the blacksmith created for good could be used to cause great harm to others.

But we also recognize the right and necessity for the state to limit freedom when its exercise harms other people, infringes upon their rights, or offends accepted moral principles.

Religion is the single most dangerous thing that has ever existed on earth and it is responsible for more death and harm to human beings than any other thing throughout history.

It can remind us that those who so cherished liberty for themselves were willing to enslave and exploit others; that a civil war and long years of struggle were required before the nation legally ended slavery, segregation and discrimination and attempted to redress the harm done to the conquered native people.