Sentences with phrase «for hiatus decades»

Figure 3: Left: composite global linear trends for hiatus decades (red bars) and all other decades (green bars) for top of the atmosphere (TOA) net radiation (positive values denote net energy entering the system).

Not exact matches

The game was a turning point for the Donkey Kong series, reintroducing it (alongside the 1994 Game Boy game released a few months prior) after a nearly decade - long hiatus and cementing Donkey Kong as a franchise in its ownright introducing Donkey Kong's modern design as well as his supporting cast and enemies, musical cues, and gameplay mechanics that would form the basis of most following Donkey Kong games as well as Donkey Kong's appearances in Mario spinoff titles.

After a a long hiatus over a decade, Stillman returned to filmmaking with the dark 2011 college comedy «Damsels in Distress,» and later made a pilot for Amazon TV called «The Cosmopolitans.»

While Abrams» reboot capitalized on a decade's hiatus for «Star Wars,» Johnson's sequel didn't have the same benefit of freshness.

If you're anything like me, you may be asking yourself what Hunter x Hunter, a manga that's been around since 1998 and has been on frequent hiatus for the last decade, is doing on this list.

Here's what we've been told about the trailers, multiplayer and release information for a game that's been molded from a decade - long hiatus of WWII titles:

After a nearly decade - long hiatus from the West Coast art scene, his paintings at this exhibition present a sort of general overview of a thrillingly differing painting practice and thus making an assertive case for the historical significance of Schnabel's opus as well as his increasing relevance to the new generations of artists and art aficionados.

After a hiatus from the West Coast art scene for nearly a decade, this first exhibition at Blum & Poe takes the form of a concise overview of an exhilaratingly divergent painting practice — making a forceful case for the historical importance of Schnabel's oeuvre as well as his ever - growing relevance to a new generation of artists.

The question has and will be asked — especially if the «hiatus» persists for another decade or 2 (as seems more likely than not)-- is just how serious this is?

This hiatus could persist for much of the present decade if the trade wind trends continue, however rapid warming is expected to resume once the anomalous wind trends abate.

If that is in fact the case, and I see no reason to doubt it, then the fact that the oceans are continuing to warm can have no bearing on the hiatus at all, and will not reflect the slowdown in atmospheric warming for «decades.»

But the argument that the hiatus will last for another decade or two is very weak and I would not put much faith in that.

After that, the hiatus in global average surface temps for well over a decade became widely known.

NOAA recently altered their data, to unilaterally wipe out the hiatus which the consensus had agreed upon for a decade.

Also for all we know, the previous decade and a half was itself an hiatus.

The study — «Possible Artifacts of Data Biases in the Recent Global Surface Warming Hiatus» — was published by Science magazine in June 2015 and pushed back against assertions from other research groups that found a pause in rising global temperatures from 1998 to 2012, which goes against climate change advocates» insistence that the earth's temperature has been on a steady incline for decades.

And the models predict that these Hiatus periods last for a decade or so.

If valid, it indicates that the mean surface temperature trend hiatus in no way refutes the core conclusions of IPCC, and will not have the power to do so even if it continues for some decades to come.

but that ENSO can still cause natural cooling for periods of a decade or more so that even though the man - made influence continues to cause warming, it is cancelled by ENSO cooling and results in a «hiatus» of global temperature increase:»

To be perfectly clear: Talk of a «hiatus» or a «pause» in global warming has been a contrarian talking point for about a decade, and there is clear evidence that this framing was picked up by the media (see Max Boykoff's article in Nature Climate Change last year) and has now been picked up by some climate scientists.

Interpretation of climate model simulations has emphasized the existence of plateaus or hiatus in the warming for time scales of up to 15 - 17 years; longer periods have not been previously anticipated, and the IPCC AR4 clearly expected a warming of 0.2 C per decade for the early part of the 21st century.

Thomas Stocker in London also diminished the importance of the recent hiatus in warming and stated that it would need to last for 3 decades before it meant anything significant.

So why is it that those insisting the hiatus is going to continue for decades refuse to acknowledge that the last five years of HadCRUT4 have seen a terrifying rise of 3.3 °C / century during that period,

The red curve is a 60 - month average that clearly indicates «global warming» in the U.S. has gone AWOL for at least a decade - on «hiatus,» so to speak.

But if you're serious about the rate of increase of CO2 being meaningful, 1990 witnessed CO2's little hiatus when the average for 1980 - 1989 declined to 1.50 ppmv / yr from the previous decade's rate of increase of 1.61 ppm / yr.

Vaughan Pratt June 23, 2015 at 3:52 am ... So why is it that those insisting the hiatus is going to continue for decades refuse to acknowledge that the last five years of HadCRUT4 have seen a terrifying rise of 3.3 °C / century during that period, yet are perfectly happy to point to a single year's change in CO2 emissions as proof that those emissions are now on the decline?

The paper confirms what John Christy has been saying for the last decade, and also supports the «denier» statements made by Ted Cruz about the hiatus.

To matters even worse, you make it look like Santer's affirms Cruz's position as well, when you write: «The paper confirms what John Christy has been saying for the last decade, and also supports the «denier» statements made by Ted Cruz about the hiatus.»

Just another dude, who like you, so misunderstood NV that he actually thought it possible for the warming hiatus to last more decades.

And because heat can be stored in places other than at the surface, a lack of surface warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term warming trends... I judge that there is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a serious challenge to the standard model [of human - caused global warming].»

For the hiatus period (2002 — 2013), significant thickening of the TL occurs only in the Southern Hemisphere extratropics (133 ± 98 m decade − 1).

A poster on SKS linked to this website which details climate scientists explanations for what they term the warming hiatus of the past decade.

If the elderly in the UK are forced to burn books for warmth this winter shall we associate that with lack of preparation for a period of flat temperatures due to the AMO / PDO or what to expect for three to seven more decades of a «warming hiatus?»

How to start up again at 69 years old after over a decade long hiatus of caring for an ill spouse?