Sentences with phrase «for higher rates of return»

If you are looking for higher rates of return than other fixed rate investments, or want less volatility than stock investments, then you should be investing with us!

Investments offering the potential for higher rates of return also involve a higher degree of risk.

Investments offering the potential for higher rates of return also involve a higher degree of risk of loss.

Investments offering the potential for higher rates of return involve a higher degree of risk.

The 2 - fund value portfolio may offer higher returns How can young investors prudently reach for higher rates of return?

Quite the juxtaposition in global equity performance, but understandable when one considers the prior period global spillover of Fed QE into the global asset markets all in the search for higher rates of return in a period that had become an ice age for nominal US interest rates.

If you are looking for higher rates of return than other fixed rate investments, or want less volatility than stock investments, then you should be investing with us!

If you don't, you are faced with either having to SAVE MORE or reach for higher rates of return (gamble).

Users who don't mind sacrificing flexibility for higher rates of returns will find this card to be highly worthwhile.

Venture capital (VC) and other private equity firms are pools of capital, typically organized as a limited partnership, that invest in companies that show the potential for a high rate of return.

Users who don't mind sacrificing flexibility for higher rates of returns will find this card to be highly worthwhile.

The key difference with variable annuities (vs. other types) is that the sub accounts offer the opportunity for a higher rate of return if asset values increase.

Fantastic answer - and reaffirms our decision that CDs are the way to go instead of trying for a higher rate of return with stocks.

The idea behind a CD is that you give up some of your liquidity in return for a higher rate of return.

So in addition to starting to save early, it's a good idea to look for the highest rate of return.

Fixed income investment describes a group of investments that provide a fixed - rate return for a set period of time with principal protection and potential for a higher rate of return.

Since you are young, you might consider putting your money in slightly riskier investments for a higher rate of return, since you have more time to recoup losses.

Came across some common names for high rate of returns proportionate to its volatility.

This is the highest transfer bonus we've seen to British Airways in a while, with more recent offers ranging from around 20 - 35 %, so if you've been waiting for a higher rate of return, this might be your chance.

The company's performance along the way has been truly impressive, exceeding both its index and the S&P / TSX Composite index as a whole over the past five years despite being a very conservative organization and in a segment not exactly known for high rates of returns.

For a higher rate of return the vacant possession value needs to be discounted a lot.

If you're looking for a high rate of return, then a whole life policy would not be the best investment option.

However, this plan is not the ideal choice, if you are looking for a high rate of return.

The key difference with variable annuities (vs. other types) is that the sub accounts offer the opportunity for a higher rate of return if asset values increase.

For a higher rate of return, you will need to look in less desirable neighborhoods and be unable to attract tenants with job stability.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

Since those investors are just looking for the highest returns, and not say buying bonds their financial advisor told them they needed bonds as part of their retirement planning, they are more likely to jump when rates rise.

For investors, the potentially high rates of return, compared with commercial loan rates running about 5 percent to 7 percent, have spurred interest despite crude prices under $ 50 a barrel.

Record - low interest rates also have caused some big institutional investors to search for returns in the high - risk, high - reward world of venture capital.

Quarterly NVCA reports: If the NVCA reports show rising VC - fund internal rates of return of higher than 8 %, it could become be easier for the funds to go to their limited partners and raise fresh capital.

Known as the «last mile» problem, the high costs, in turn, make it difficult for companies to earn a solid rate of return on the installation investment.

Returns are calculated after taxes on distributions, including capital gains and dividends, assuming the highest federal tax rate for each type of distribution in effect at the time of the distribution Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

These benefits would (i) largely go to developers and contractors for infrastructure projects like new pipelines that would happen even without new incentives and so be highly regressive; (ii) raise costs by failing to reach the tax - free pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and international investors who are the most plausible sources of incremental infrastructure finance; (iii) not encourage at all the highest return maintenance projects like fixing potholes that do not yield a pecuniary return for investors; and (iv) by offering credits at an unprecedented 82 percent rate, invite all kinds of tax shelter abuse.

All told, we see another coupon - driven year for high yield with total returns of about 6 % possible as spreads tighten in line with anticipated modest increases in interest rates.

Well, it will certainly lift the rate of return investors expect from stocks, but bulls insists that with earnings growing 20 percent this year, the expected return may be sufficiently high, so that there will not be any shift out of equities, that corporations are going to make enough money to more than compensate for higher rates.

The implications of moderately higher rates: Expect low or negative returns for government bonds globally in the medium term.

Every defense of current P / E ratios must assume either a higher long - term growth rate than is evident from historical data, or it must assume that investors are willing to hold stocks for a long - term return of substantially less than 10 %.

The «search for yield», i.e. for better return on financial investments than the declining interest rate, thus led to the series of bubbles & bursts: deregulated savings & loans (immediately), high - tech stocks (late 90's), mortgage derivatives — > house prices (2000's).

In return for that time guarantee, the bank pays you a higher rate of interest than a typical savings account.

First, the riskiness associated with capital investment might have gone up and so higher rates of return could be simply compensating for higher risk rather than implying attractive investments.

And for investors who are looking for somewhere to put their money that provides the highest rate of return, stocks can look particularly attractive when returns on other investments are lower.

These benefits would (i) largely go to developers and contractors for infrastructure projects like new pipelines that would happen even without new incentives and so be highly regressive; (ii) raise costs by failing to reach the tax - free pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and international investors that are the most plausible sources of incremental infrastructure finance; (iii) not encourage at all the highest return maintenance projects like fixing potholes that do not yield a pecuniary return for investors; and (iv) by offering credits at an unprecedented 82 per cent rate, invite all kinds of tax - shelter abuse.

The idea is for Wall Street to sell all these bad debts to pension funds and say you'll make a high rate of return, and then you'll be left holding the bag when it all collapses.

In Chile's case they said nothing about the way this transferred risk from the private to the public sector, even though they defended high rates of return as a reward for the private sector ostensibly taking risks.

Although our fund breakdowns were very close, they are getting almost a 2 % higher personal rate of return than I'm getting which has more than made up for the fee cost.

Admati and Hellwig counter that the only reason stockholders demand such a high rate of return from banks is to compensate for the relative riskiness of banks — and that they are risky precisely because of all the debt they hold on their balance sheets.

I've often called it the Iron Law of Valuation: the higher the price you pay today for a given stream of future cash flows, the lower your rate of return over the life of the investment.

Thus, if we look at bonds from a historical perspective, interest rates are very low — which is great for those borrowing money — but not so great for those that wish to see higher rates of interest, and return, on their money.

Despite a challenging energy market, we believe the management team has a solid plan for the future, as CEO John Christmann recently changed the company's capital allocation process to better direct capital to the highest internal rate of return projects, regardless of where they are located.

Unlike its successful European counterparts, demand for higher risk - adjusted returns, the existence of retrocession fees and stronger desire to retain control, continue to act as headwinds to grow fee - based assets, at a rate that outpaces private banks» robust AUM growth and regional wealth creation.