Nonetheless, the congressional endorsement was valuable publicity for charters, which gained public recognition and new opportunities to expand and compete with neighborhood public
schools for higher test scores.
When students, teachers and schools are
rewarded for high test scores and punished for low ones, the tests themselves become the focus of education.
The idea of financial incentives is based on logic that economists find eminently sensible — workers work harder when money is at stake, so giving teachers higher
pay for higher test scores should cause test scores to go up.
California charter advocates, however, point to multiple studies indicating that so - called cherry - picking does not
account for the higher test scores seen among charter students.
If we presume that teachers are
responsible for high test scores and improved student proficiency, then that would mean the teachers at PS 199 are «good,» while the teachers are PS 191 are «bad.»
In the past couple of decades, as test scores drop and the United States falls farther behind other countries in math and science, the idea that schools should follow a business model has been dominant, stressing competition, choice and accountability, raising teacher
pay for higher test scores, closing schools that fail.
The U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan made a surprise call to New Leader Josie Carbone, principal of Girls Prep Charter School in the Bronx, to congratulate
her for high test scores, the New York Daily News reports.