The general reasoning of the Court seems to imply that this requirement could not be set for other categories in similar situations either, such as asylum seekers who fear prosecution
for their homosexual orientation, or «westernised» women who fear they will be subjected to persecution of returned to their home country.
Advances in biomedical technology, however, should push the two groups to agree that the biological basis
for the homosexual orientation is irrelevant.
Bruni gets the number right; the 1990 landmark study by Bailey and Pillard reported a 52 % «probandwise concordance»
for homosexual orientation among genetically identical sibling groups, but this does not mean what Bruni says it means.
Not exact matches
«Regarding
homosexuals, it went so far as to pose the question whether the church could accept and value their sexual
orientation without compromising Catholic doctrine,» said John Thavis, a former Rome bureau chief
for Catholic News Service.
Let us never use the word «
homosexual» in reference to a person,
for it is a term that has become an epithet in the usage of those who are biased against persons of
homosexual orientation.
This becomes thornier yet
for those who discern in themselves a «
homosexual orientation,» as they adopt an identity distinguished essentially by a set of genital sexual desires that can not morally be fulfilled.
What is wrong, what is unnatural, what is immoral and what is gross is intolerance and discrimination against fellow human beings
for their sexual
orientation and active pursuit of preventing loving and committed
homosexual couples from legally being married.
A
homosexual «
orientation,» no matter how strongly it is subjectively experienced within our person, does not exist within God's blueprint
for humanity.
Under ordinances forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation, churches have been taken to court
for refusing to hire a
homosexual as church organist or as teacher in the church school, ministries to the poor have lost their funding when they refused to tolerate
homosexual behavior within their programs, and a Jesuit university was required to give recognition and support to a gay rights group.
The differentiation of
homosexual orientation from gender identity (
for females as well as males) has been increasingly recognized, and a highly competent summing up is available in Man and Woman: Boy and Girl, by John Money and Anke A. Ehrhardt (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972).
While psychiatrists will, of course, be available to help people with a
homosexual orientation if they want such help, the APA's decision is a clear disclaimer of responsibility
for changing
homosexual persons who are not troubled by their
orientation and whose behavior is not socially irresponsible.
Both sides are fighting the battle on the question of whether
homosexuals are «wired»
for homosexuality, that is, whether there is an intrinsic neurochemical basis
for sexual
orientation.
While the military does not seek to discriminate unjustly, it believes
for a number of sound reasons that persons with a
homosexual orientation could experience difficulty in controlling their behavior in light of the unique circumstances of military life.
It can be argued that the deliberate manifestation by word or deed of one's
homosexual orientation marks the beginning of behavioral change because the announcement itself is the demand
for a social infrastructure to support the behavior.
In any case, practicing
homosexuals today more frequently do not consider their
orientation a private matter, but are inclined to seek public affirmation
for their lifestyle.
Even if it may be shown that some
homosexuals have an
orientation that they have not chosen, it is fair to state that
homosexual behavior is in fact «a choice,» and one that most people do not view as normal conduct either
for themselves or their sons and daughters in or out of the military.
I continue to press
for a clear distinction between
homosexual orientation and same - sex attraction, on the one hand, and being gay, on the other.
The distinction between persons of a
homosexual orientation and people who choose to engage in same - gender sexual acts comes from the growing conviction that
for a percentage of every population, homosexuality is a given, a life
orientation that they did not choose.
When seen as a life
orientation, the issue raised
for the church is no longer that of the sexual behavior of
homosexual Christians.
Here again there is a need
for greater balance and the clear recognition that
homosexual people should not be reduced to their
orientations; nor should the
homosexual orientation be reduced to sexual behavior.
While these groups are undoubtedly a valuable support
for many people, there have been some questions raised recently from within the group itself about the underlying premise of Courage that a
homosexual orientation is a psychological disorder.
The Roman Catholic church maintains this position, recently describing the
homosexual orientation as an «objective disorder».15 In Protestant and Anglican churches, a distinction is now often made between a
homosexual orientation and
homosexual genital acts; the
orientation is part of some people's God - given make - up and not something
for which they should be condemned.
During the last three decades,
for example, organizations representing 1.5 million U.S. health professionals (doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, counselors, and educators) have stated definitively that
homosexual orientation is as natural as heterosexual
orientation; that sexual
orientation is determined by a combination of yet unknown pre - and post — natal influences, and that it is dangerous and inappropriate to tell a
homosexual that he or she could or should attempt to change his or her sexual
orientation.
For more than 25 years, both associations have urged all mental health professionals to help dispel the stigma of mental illness that some people still associate with
homosexual orientation.»
The person is not to blame
for his or her
orientation but is to blame
for homosexual acts.
As an atheist I don't believe in God anyway, but if there was a God he would have to be sadistic kind of monster to create people with a naturally
homosexual orientation and then condemn them
for it.
While most people indeed have a heterosexual
orientation and identify with a single gender that was assigned to them at birth, it has become increasingly clear that this is not the case
for everyone, that gender and sexuality might better be understood as manifesting themselves along continuums, with male / female, masculine / feminine, heterosexual /
homosexual existing at the poles but with a variety of identities,
orientations, and expressions in between.
The church's firm support of civil rights
for gay persons ought not depend upon agreement concerning the theological and ethical appropriateness of the
homosexual orientation or of specific same - sex acts.
«The current proposals endeavour to equate
homosexual partnerships which are in principle non-child bearing with heterosexual partnerships which are in principle procreative and establish a set of rules
for state supported sexual relationships that are blind to sexual
orientation,» he said in a blog post.
Other biological components of
homosexual behaviour have also been found: brain structures that differ with sexual
orientation,
for example, and robust theories
for how genes survive in the population despite rarely being passed on by
homosexual people.
Closeted participants supported harsher punishments
for homosexuals and more antigay policies than those who were comfortable in their straight
orientation.
This group can also be called greedy, because although the physical and heterosexual or
homosexual orientation, but also have a similar interest in (
for hetero) and different types (
for homo).
At a time when people were persecuted
for their sexual
orientation, Hennessy made works containing narratives of
homosexual life that align him with the emerging queer - art movement of the 1970s.
In its decision, one of the judges referred to the claim
for equal human rights protection as an effort to seek «the validation of
homosexual relations, including sodomy, as a protected and fundamental right... rebutting a millennia of moral teaching» and then shockingly went on to liken the protection of sexual
orientation in human rights legislation with the «violently aberrant sexual configurations» of mass murderers Jeffrey Dahmer, Paul Bernardo and Clifford Olsen.